Comments on: What do Richard Branson & Tina Fey have in common? http://gigaom.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common-2/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Daniel http://gigaom.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common-2/#comment-185523 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:56:13 +0000 http://foundread.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common/#comment-185523 I couldn’t understand some parts of this article Richard Branson & Tina Fey have in common? « FoundRead, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.

]]> By: gamechanger1 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common-2/#comment-185521 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:49:03 +0000 http://foundread.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common/#comment-185521 Alex

I love that you typo’ed ‘improve’ classes.

You would be amazed how many times people do that. It’s a natural connection to make. By letter count, I got yer ‘improv’ as about 85.7% of yer ‘improve’. I think that’s about right…

Thanks for your comment,

Bonifer

]]> By: alex4comment http://gigaom.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common-2/#comment-185520 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:36:53 +0000 http://foundread.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common/#comment-185520 Wow, I never thought of using improve classes as a tool for personal growth AND business development.

I love that you sent a difficult co-worker to improve classes. I am going to bookmark that idea for future reference.

]]> By: daintree http://gigaom.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common-2/#comment-185522 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:36:07 +0000 http://foundread.com/2007/11/19/what-do-richard-branson-tina-fey-have-in-common/#comment-185522 >>3) THEMES. Who reads instruction manuals? Like, uh, no one?

I hadn’t thought of this before… but its true. People are a lot more ‘iterative’ in our learning – do, review, redo – than traditional training approaches allow. Some would say then that we’re not learning so ‘deeply’ (we just skim, take the path of least resistance) and on the other hand don’t we understand concepts better than a rote learner?

]]>