<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Amazing Rise of WebKit Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;For those that believe apple &quot;created webkit&quot; a quote from wikipedia&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;The code that would become WebKit began in 1998 as the KDE project’s HTML layout engine KHTML and KDE&#039;s JavaScript engine (KJS). The name and project &#039;WebKit&#039; were created in 2002 when Apple Inc. created a fork of KHTML&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So Apple gave it the webkit name. that is not creating webkit. They also took 3 years to &quot;open source&quot; it. even though it was born from open source.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that believe apple &#8220;created webkit&#8221; a quote from wikipedia</p>
<p>&#8220;The code that would become WebKit began in 1998 as the KDE project’s HTML layout engine KHTML and KDE&#8217;s JavaScript engine (KJS). The name and project &#8216;WebKit&#8217; were created in 2002 when Apple Inc. created a fork of KHTML&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit</a></p>
<p>So Apple gave it the webkit name. that is not creating webkit. They also took 3 years to &#8220;open source&#8221; it. even though it was born from open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebKit Is Great, But Isn&#8217;t the Great Unifier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebKit Is Great, But Isn&#8217;t the Great Unifier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 14:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] for mobile, where devices are smaller and less powerful than other platforms. And developers say it&#8217;s easier to code for than other mobile browser [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for mobile, where devices are smaller and less powerful than other platforms. And developers say it&#8217;s easier to code for than other mobile browser [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For Firefox, a Challenging Future Awaits</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[For Firefox, a Challenging Future Awaits]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pre and Apple&#8217;s iPhone. These platforms are attracting developers, who will work with WebKit and not Firefox. In other words, Mozilla runs the risk of losing developer [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pre and Apple&#8217;s iPhone. These platforms are attracting developers, who will work with WebKit and not Firefox. In other words, Mozilla runs the risk of losing developer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cloud Makes Computers Truly Cheap and Truly Personal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cloud Makes Computers Truly Cheap and Truly Personal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] store associated with a carrier or a device. As the article points out, Google took advantage of features on the WebKit open-source browser engine to build the app and make it behave as if it were running on the device, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] store associated with a carrier or a device. As the article points out, Google took advantage of features on the WebKit open-source browser engine to build the app and make it behave as if it were running on the device, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And now Google Android and Palm Pre are both using the Webkit rendering engine.  This is good news.  Hopefully they will join IE and intelligently agree to web standards for developers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now Google Android and Palm Pre are both using the Webkit rendering engine.  This is good news.  Hopefully they will join IE and intelligently agree to web standards for developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartphone Sales to Keep Growing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smartphone Sales to Keep Growing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the availability of the iPhone, which forced handset makers to embrace a more open web via standards-based web browsers  and thus changed the mobile landscape forever.    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the availability of the iPhone, which forced handset makers to embrace a more open web via standards-based web browsers  and thus changed the mobile landscape forever.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone / Android Optimized Theme &#171; C. Murray Consulting</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone / Android Optimized Theme &#171; C. Murray Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] v1, we focused on the powerful and increasingly ubiqitous mobile WebKit, the website rendering engine used by the web browser on the iPhone and Google&#8217;s Android [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] v1, we focused on the powerful and increasingly ubiqitous mobile WebKit, the website rendering engine used by the web browser on the iPhone and Google&#8217;s Android [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Chrome is a win-win for Google &#124; last100</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Chrome is a win-win for Google &#124; last100]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] e.g. the V8 Javascript engine and the company&#8217;s own contributions to the open source WebKit rendering engine (also utilized by Apple, Adobe and Nokia) get picked up by competitors and improve the running of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e.g. the V8 Javascript engine and the company&#8217;s own contributions to the open source WebKit rendering engine (also utilized by Apple, Adobe and Nokia) get picked up by competitors and improve the running of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Browser Is Real. Another Win For Webkit - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Browser Is Real. Another Win For Webkit - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] However, where it is vulnerable is on the mobile where IE Mobile has a non-existence market share. Like Mozilla, Microsoft is playing catch up with Webkit that is the core rendering engine for Nokia S60 phones, Apple&#8217;s iPhone Safari and Google Android devices. Even a Windows Mobile version is in the works. (Read: Webkit report.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, where it is vulnerable is on the mobile where IE Mobile has a non-existence market share. Like Mozilla, Microsoft is playing catch up with Webkit that is the core rendering engine for Nokia S60 phones, Apple&#8217;s iPhone Safari and Google Android devices. Even a Windows Mobile version is in the works. (Read: Webkit report.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: depe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[depe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple did not create Webkit.  Apple took KHTML code from KDE and modified it into Webkit.  So Apple should NOT get credit for creating Webkit.  Far from it, Apple should be disparaged for taking KDE&#039;s code without providing feedback that would help KDE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple did not create Webkit.  Apple took KHTML code from KDE and modified it into Webkit.  So Apple should NOT get credit for creating Webkit.  Far from it, Apple should be disparaged for taking KDE&#8217;s code without providing feedback that would help KDE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebKit Comes To Windows Mobile Devices - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebKit Comes To Windows Mobile Devices - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to try it out later today, especially if I can find a Windows Mobile device. (From the Archives: The Amazing Rise of WebKit Mobile.)     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to try it out later today, especially if I can find a Windows Mobile device. (From the Archives: The Amazing Rise of WebKit Mobile.)     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Connor Clarke</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael O'Connor Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Excuse me dropping into this discussion rather late with what is, I must confess, a blatant pitch, but just wanted to let you all know that what is almost certainly the first WebKit browser for Windows Mobile is now available for preview download from Torch Mobile, here: http://www.torchmobile.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Versions of the new Iris Browser coming for other platforms from the same developers soon.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me dropping into this discussion rather late with what is, I must confess, a blatant pitch, but just wanted to let you all know that what is almost certainly the first WebKit browser for Windows Mobile is now available for preview download from Torch Mobile, here: <a href="http://www.torchmobile.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.torchmobile.com</a></p>
<p>Versions of the new Iris Browser coming for other platforms from the same developers soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Addition: I&#039;m certain that Google also has a hand in WebKit as well with its inclusion in the Java-based Android platform.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addition: I&#8217;m certain that Google also has a hand in WebKit as well with its inclusion in the Java-based Android platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;reinharden and fog city dave, you&#039;re both wrong about WebKit. WebKit was, and continues to be, based on alot of the work of the KDE project (KHTML, KJS, KSVG).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The forking of it by Apple to create the WebKit platform was well and good, but the sending back of heaps of revised code that had to be sorted by the KDE folk created discrepancies in communication between KDE and Apple early on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But now that KDE4 is out, WebKit is being reintegrated into the KDE, particularly since Trolltech (which bankrolls a few of the KDE developers because of their preference for their Qt toolkit) was bought by Nokia, which uses WebKit in their S60 mobile browser.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Either way, WebKit, except for the name, did not start out as an Apple creation. KDE plays a continual role in WebKit&#039;s development as much as the engineers from Apple and Nokia.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reinharden and fog city dave, you&#8217;re both wrong about WebKit. WebKit was, and continues to be, based on alot of the work of the KDE project (KHTML, KJS, KSVG).</p>
<p>The forking of it by Apple to create the WebKit platform was well and good, but the sending back of heaps of revised code that had to be sorted by the KDE folk created discrepancies in communication between KDE and Apple early on.</p>
<p>But now that KDE4 is out, WebKit is being reintegrated into the KDE, particularly since Trolltech (which bankrolls a few of the KDE developers because of their preference for their Qt toolkit) was bought by Nokia, which uses WebKit in their S60 mobile browser.</p>
<p>Either way, WebKit, except for the name, did not start out as an Apple creation. KDE plays a continual role in WebKit&#8217;s development as much as the engineers from Apple and Nokia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajax Alive and Kicking &#171; You can solve your problem here..</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ajax Alive and Kicking &#171; You can solve your problem here..]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] you know what the best part of being standards based is? You get included in all the coolest new technologies. Can the same be said of the de-facto standards? Well, Opera is [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you know what the best part of being standards based is? You get included in all the coolest new technologies. Can the same be said of the de-facto standards? Well, Opera is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Johnson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ajax Alive and Kicking</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Johnson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ajax Alive and Kicking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/13/webkit/#comment-185181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] you know what the best part of being standards based is? You get included in all the coolest new technologies. Can the same be said of the de-facto standards? Well, Opera is [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you know what the best part of being standards based is? You get included in all the coolest new technologies. Can the same be said of the de-facto standards? Well, Opera is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

