<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Sprint Send Silicon Valley a Super Poke?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. WiMAX Saved by $3.2 Billion Infusion - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. WiMAX Saved by $3.2 Billion Infusion - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] final word: I told you so comes to mind [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] final word: I told you so comes to mind [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CableCos Join The $3 Billion US WiMAX Rescue Act - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CableCos Join The $3 Billion US WiMAX Rescue Act - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] in recent months. The two companies were contemplating a joint venture but that was scratched. I proposed perhaps Silicon Valley companies could get Sprint to spin-off its WiMAX business, and the fund what essentially would be a wholesale network. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in recent months. The two companies were contemplating a joint venture but that was scratched. I proposed perhaps Silicon Valley companies could get Sprint to spin-off its WiMAX business, and the fund what essentially would be a wholesale network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will 3rd Pipe Dreams Come True? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will 3rd Pipe Dreams Come True? - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] precisely what I had suggested in my essay, Should Sprint Send Silicon Valley A Super Poke? Google and a whole slew of Silicon Valley companies that need the “third broadband pipe” could [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] precisely what I had suggested in my essay, Should Sprint Send Silicon Valley A Super Poke? Google and a whole slew of Silicon Valley companies that need the “third broadband pipe” could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will 3rd Pipe Dreams Come True? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will 3rd Pipe Dreams Come True? - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] precisely what I had suggested in my essay, Should Sprint Send Silicon Valley A Super Poke? Google and a whole slew of Silicon Valley companies that need the “third broadband pipe” could [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] precisely what I had suggested in my essay, Should Sprint Send Silicon Valley A Super Poke? Google and a whole slew of Silicon Valley companies that need the “third broadband pipe” could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Liu dot com / musings from the edge &#187; Articles of the Day</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Liu dot com / musings from the edge &#187; Articles of the Day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] What if Google Bought Sprint? - Things have been looking down for telecom giant Sprint Nextel for some time. Following the resignation of CEO Gary Forsee, the company&#8217;s WiMAX plans are up in the air. Investors see WiMAX as a huge risk, particularly for a company that&#8217;s recently been under-performing so badly. Last week, Sprint announced it was halting its joint venture with Clearwire, citing Forsee&#8217;s departure and the complexity of building a nationwide WiMAX network.                                 [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What if Google Bought Sprint? &#8211; Things have been looking down for telecom giant Sprint Nextel for some time. Following the resignation of CEO Gary Forsee, the company&#8217;s WiMAX plans are up in the air. Investors see WiMAX as a huge risk, particularly for a company that&#8217;s recently been under-performing so badly. Last week, Sprint announced it was halting its joint venture with Clearwire, citing Forsee&#8217;s departure and the complexity of building a nationwide WiMAX network.                                 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSquirrel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Anon,
Embarq was only Sprint&#039;s LOCAL Wireline division.  Sprint still has a World Class IP network and Voice network that 30% of the world&#039;s traffic goes over.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon,<br />
Embarq was only Sprint&#8217;s LOCAL Wireline division.  Sprint still has a World Class IP network and Voice network that 30% of the world&#8217;s traffic goes over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superdana</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Superdana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;In response to Laz Sanchez:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s only a matter of time before it happens (a &quot;free or at least ad-subsidized&quot; connectivity blanket). It is likely to start as a combination of WiFi and Wimax depending on coverage and accessibility in diffferent regions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The synergies in the mobile/Internet ecosystem make this blanket inevitable on the long term (let me emphasize &lt;em&gt;long&lt;/em&gt;), regardless of what happens to Sprint&#039;s Xohm right now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The cooperative Alliances across the industries (mobile/ internet) and accross the value chains(hardware/ operators/ gatekeeper) are taking shape already with Google in the front row, without having to invest in the bit-pipe themselves. But it will take some time for the gears to lock into each other and for the different interests to align nicely enough to create this blanket you describe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The question is what happens next? do other industries replicate the business model? do you get free electricity if you agree to buy wall switches with small ads on them...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;... or rather, does the key lie in the open-sourced user-created content in the case of the mobile/Internet industry, and not in the ad-subsidies? or in the mobility itself? (I&#039;m thinking location based services?)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing is for sure: all options are open, and conditions are being proactively optimized for the ideas to start popping up (android). the end is certain, the means will be developed collectively by 1 billion connected internet amateurs.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Laz Sanchez:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only a matter of time before it happens (a &#8220;free or at least ad-subsidized&#8221; connectivity blanket). It is likely to start as a combination of WiFi and Wimax depending on coverage and accessibility in diffferent regions.</p>
<p>The synergies in the mobile/Internet ecosystem make this blanket inevitable on the long term (let me emphasize <em>long</em>), regardless of what happens to Sprint&#8217;s Xohm right now.</p>
<p>The cooperative Alliances across the industries (mobile/ internet) and accross the value chains(hardware/ operators/ gatekeeper) are taking shape already with Google in the front row, without having to invest in the bit-pipe themselves. But it will take some time for the gears to lock into each other and for the different interests to align nicely enough to create this blanket you describe.</p>
<p>The question is what happens next? do other industries replicate the business model? do you get free electricity if you agree to buy wall switches with small ads on them&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; or rather, does the key lie in the open-sourced user-created content in the case of the mobile/Internet industry, and not in the ad-subsidies? or in the mobility itself? (I&#8217;m thinking location based services?)</p>
<p>One thing is for sure: all options are open, and conditions are being proactively optimized for the ideas to start popping up (android). the end is certain, the means will be developed collectively by 1 billion connected internet amateurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Take Two: Google&#8217;s Wireless Ambitions &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Take Two: Google&#8217;s Wireless Ambitions &#171; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] My guess is that they are going to try and participate via investments in other efforts. I had outlined one crazy scenario last week. Nevertheless, it is fun to see Google drive the wireless carriers batty with its posturing, and at [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My guess is that they are going to try and participate via investments in other efforts. I had outlined one crazy scenario last week. Nevertheless, it is fun to see Google drive the wireless carriers batty with its posturing, and at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich houghton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rich houghton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;What are the odds now that it looks like A-Fraud will be back at third base?  Really, who else could have, or would have been able to afford A-Fraud?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the odds now that it looks like A-Fraud will be back at third base?  Really, who else could have, or would have been able to afford A-Fraud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laz Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laz Sanchez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/sprint-google/#comment-184945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Guys...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A drastic move would be to buy SPRINT and start giving all service away for free.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition the company could reinitiate the ClearWire talks and work with this company and others to blanket the world with a free (or at least ad-subsidized) WiMax network.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;God, I hope NOT...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys&#8230;</p>
<p>A drastic move would be to buy SPRINT and start giving all service away for free.</p>
<p>In addition the company could reinitiate the ClearWire talks and work with this company and others to blanket the world with a free (or at least ad-subsidized) WiMax network.</p>
<p>God, I hope NOT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
