Comments on: The Time Has Come for IPv6 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/ The Business of Technology Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:47:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: The IPv6 Revolution is Nigh - GigaOM http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-860085 The IPv6 Revolution is Nigh - GigaOM Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:00:31 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-860085 <p>[...] IPv6 does offer advantages over IPv4, the transition to this new Internet addressing scheme is not without controversy and contention in the Internet community. There are more than a few technical issues that need solving before we [...]</p> [...] IPv6 does offer advantages over IPv4, the transition to this new Internet addressing scheme is not without controversy and contention in the Internet community. There are more than a few technical issues that need solving before we [...]

]]> By: The Law of Mobility » Blog Archive » Managing the Danger: Week of 11/11/07 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-677525 The Law of Mobility » Blog Archive » Managing the Danger: Week of 11/11/07 Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:40:22 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-677525 <p>[...] IPv6 [...]</p> [...] IPv6 [...]

]]> By: Marc Manthey http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-675483 Marc Manthey Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:55:20 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-675483 <p>The questions is "how could ISPs encouraged to migrate to ipv6.</p> <p>Here is thats another idea what i found a few days before</p> <p>http://www.ipv6porn.com</p> The questions is “how could ISPs
encouraged to migrate to ipv6.

Here is thats another idea what i found
a few days before

(link)

]]> By: John Curran http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-669644 John Curran Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:14:24 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-669644 <p>Einar Vollset - The problem is that even with NAT, we're rapidly running out of available IPv4 for additional Internet growth. See Geoff Huston's excellent analysis (updated daily) at: < http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html></p> <p>/John</p> Einar Vollset - The problem is that even with NAT, we’re rapidly running out of available IPv4 for additional Internet growth. See Geoff Huston’s excellent analysis (updated daily) at:
< (link) ;

/John

]]> By: ben http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-666097 ben Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:57:45 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-666097 <p>There is a well known benefit for Mergers and Acquisitions. As an enterprise network operator, my management just bought a company that has the same RFC 1918 address space as me (say, for example we all use 10.x.x.x addresses).</p> <p>What are the costs of re-addressing one of those networks?</p> <p>IPv6 could solve this.</p> <p>Thanks.</p> There is a well known benefit for Mergers and Acquisitions. As an enterprise network operator, my management just bought a company that has the same RFC 1918 address space as me (say, for example we all use 10.x.x.x addresses).

What are the costs of re-addressing one of those networks?

IPv6 could solve this.

Thanks.

]]> By: trademark registration http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-660782 trademark registration Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:21:47 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-660782 <p>Did you know that you're listed as one of the "Top Posts" on WordPress? That's awesome...congrats!</p> Did you know that you’re listed as one of the “Top Posts” on WordPress? That’s awesome…congrats!

]]> By: Andy Choi http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-659683 Andy Choi Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:02:19 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-659683 <p>Einar Vollset, you mentioned there's no any benefit but as I know, still BIG players including Defense & Government or Network operators continue to do their efforts. So I'm wondering that maturing NAT techniques are enough for all those things what IPv6 promised? (for mobile devices or home networking or etc) Can you show me anything backing your point of view?</p> Einar Vollset, you mentioned there’s no any benefit but as I know, still BIG players including Defense & Government or Network operators continue to do their efforts. So I’m wondering that maturing NAT techniques are enough for all those things what IPv6 promised? (for mobile devices or home networking or etc) Can you show me anything backing your point of view?

]]> By: Einar Vollset http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-657987 Einar Vollset Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:01:06 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-657987 <p>Nope, disagree. IPv6 is a solution to a problem that largely doesn't exist any more. It did when the WG got together, but it just isn't an issue any more with NAT (+ NAT traversal techniques becoming mature).</p> <p>Basically, there's no economic or functional benefit for any of the big players to switch. So they won't.</p> Nope, disagree. IPv6 is a solution to a problem that largely doesn’t exist any more. It did when the WG got together, but it just isn’t an issue any more with NAT (+ NAT traversal techniques becoming mature).

Basically, there’s no economic or functional benefit for any of the big players to switch. So they won’t.

]]> By: Giving IPv6 a try http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-657598 Giving IPv6 a try Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:48:12 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-657598 <p>[...] Wow, this very well maybe the dorkiest thing I’ve ever posted. For more detailed information, check out the post on GigaOM. [...]</p> [...] Wow, this very well maybe the dorkiest thing I’ve ever posted. For more detailed information, check out the post on GigaOM. [...]

]]> By: Raindeer http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-656944 Raindeer Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:13:33 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/the-time-has-come-for-ipv6/#comment-656944 <p>This is a very serious problem that should be adressed in the coming years. One of the main questions that was discussed at the RIPE meeting however was how to deal with the transition period. The debate is well framed by Geoff Huston http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/huston-ipv4.pdf</p> <p>The European incumbent telco organisation ETNO argued that we should do nothing, signalling that they have more than enough adresses and getting mechanisms in place to help others, will only improve competition something ETNO has always been firmly against. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/mcfadden-etno.pdf</p> <p>Remco van Mook argued that there should be a market mechanism within the existing framework of the assignment of IP-blocks. This would allow the legitimate and controlled transfer of IP-blocks from one party to the next and would severely discourage any attempts to bypass the current system, which would lead to chaos. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/vanmook-v4policy-change.pdf</p> <p>Peter Lothberg also held a great presentation on a different subject namely, How to get 40Gbit/s to your mother: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/lothberg-40-gb-to-my-mother.pdf</p> This is a very serious problem that should be adressed in the coming years. One of the main questions that was discussed at the RIPE meeting however was how to deal with the transition period. The debate is well framed by Geoff Huston (link)

The European incumbent telco organisation ETNO argued that we should do nothing, signalling that they have more than enough adresses and getting mechanisms in place to help others, will only improve competition something ETNO has always been firmly against. (link)

Remco van Mook argued that there should be a market mechanism within the existing framework of the assignment of IP-blocks. This would allow the legitimate and controlled transfer of IP-blocks from one party to the next and would severely discourage any attempts to bypass the current system, which would lead to chaos. (link)

Peter Lothberg also held a great presentation on a different subject namely, How to get 40Gbit/s to your mother: (link)

]]>