<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HiveLive Takes Web 2.0 Upscale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;As a manufacturer of sporting goods, I stumbled upon a similar business social networking platform site called Egonest.  It allows us to communicate/network/share with our employees, suppliers, retailers, distributors, etc. and is a free resource.  My question is, what is the advantage of using one of these paid platforms?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a manufacturer of sporting goods, I stumbled upon a similar business social networking platform site called Egonest.  It allows us to communicate/network/share with our employees, suppliers, retailers, distributors, etc. and is a free resource.  My question is, what is the advantage of using one of these paid platforms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Manages to Sober Up &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web 2.0 Manages to Sober Up &#171; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] once investors were no longer willing to fund their continued search for a workable strategy. HiveLive is finding success not by giving away services, but by selling [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] once investors were no longer willing to fund their continued search for a workable strategy. HiveLive is finding success not by giving away services, but by selling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free market research company</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[free market research company]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;from Kylie minogue to GE , to leverage online advertising revenue, all are trying their hands in web 2 social media syndrome. however, nobody seemed to bother privacy law, where user can switch of online advertisement i.e. revenue model can fall flat?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from Kylie minogue to GE , to leverage online advertising revenue, all are trying their hands in web 2 social media syndrome. however, nobody seemed to bother privacy law, where user can switch of online advertisement i.e. revenue model can fall flat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Heaton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Heaton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/05/hivelive/#comment-184001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interesting post, Anne. Very timely for my thinking!
There has been a shift in marketing ... from B2B seems to be learning from B2C and vice versa. We are treating the people in businesses like we treat them in the B2C world -- and this is changing the game, ever so slightly. But I think this is indicative of a larger shift ... a new B2C is emerging. Not Business 2 Consumer but Brand to Community. This has new rules (which are still emerging), but it fits right in with what you are describing. I will be keen to take a closer look at HiveLive to see whether it can illustrate anything more!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, Anne. Very timely for my thinking!<br />
There has been a shift in marketing &#8230; from B2B seems to be learning from B2C and vice versa. We are treating the people in businesses like we treat them in the B2C world &#8212; and this is changing the game, ever so slightly. But I think this is indicative of a larger shift &#8230; a new B2C is emerging. Not Business 2 Consumer but Brand to Community. This has new rules (which are still emerging), but it fits right in with what you are describing. I will be keen to take a closer look at HiveLive to see whether it can illustrate anything more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

