<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo&#8217;s China Syndrome: Alibaba IPO Lifts YHOO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jpmist</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-643458</link>
		<dc:creator>jpmist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-643458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good to see someone put the numbers out. One more would help and that&#039;s Yahoo&#039;s market cap of $45 billion. If Yahoo&#039;s $1 billion investment doubles or triples I don&#039;t see how that&#039;s worth more than a few bucks a share.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shark fins? Music piracy? Get a grip guys. . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see someone put the numbers out. One more would help and that&#8217;s Yahoo&#8217;s market cap of $45 billion. If Yahoo&#8217;s $1 billion investment doubles or triples I don&#8217;t see how that&#8217;s worth more than a few bucks a share.</p>

<p>Shark fins? Music piracy? Get a grip guys. . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang Leander</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-635664</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang Leander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-635664</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do you know that Alibaba (and Yahoo!, by extension) have an ugly blemish? Alibaba is the world`s largest online shark fin trader. Click this link, and read carefully:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.celsias.com/2007/10/28/alibaba-com-and-yahoo-back-shark-fin-traders/#comments&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know that Alibaba (and Yahoo!, by extension) have an ugly blemish? Alibaba is the world`s largest online shark fin trader. Click this link, and read carefully:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.celsias.com/2007/10/28/alibaba-com-and-yahoo-back-shark-fin-traders/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.celsias.com/2007/10/28/alibaba-com-and-yahoo-back-shark-fin-traders/#comments</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Market Research Tool</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-635609</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Market Research Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-635609</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;bingo this would make google thinking - bidau and Alibaba are the two stocks to watch in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bingo this would make google thinking &#8211; bidau and Alibaba are the two stocks to watch in the near future.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maths</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-634528</link>
		<dc:creator>maths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/29/yahoo-alibaba/#comment-634528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;China Syndrome indeed! 
For perspective from the ground level in China, before we all get carried away with just the mere numbers, it is important to note that at the same time Yahoo makes part of its revenues in China via music piracy. And they couldn&#039;t even do that properly as they&#039;ve been found guilty as hell by a Chinese court.
If credit is to be accorded to Jerry Yang for brokering the China deal - and as Yahoo is obviously benefiting from it financially - he is also complicit in benefiting from music piracy on the side also. 
Sadly, this seems to be how the business model works: US investment money funds a lot of the piracy in China, US investors make a killing, and then the US government goes after China in the WTO kangaroo court.
And since Yahoo Music&#039;s Ian Rogers has already laid out his expected moral standards in his famous blog piece, it is time for him examine his own house a little more and clear some of the existing duplicity
[Before anyone cleverly points out that the Alibaba IPO does not include the Yahoo China part, it was still the same deal that brought Yahoo in in the first place]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China Syndrome indeed! 
For perspective from the ground level in China, before we all get carried away with just the mere numbers, it is important to note that at the same time Yahoo makes part of its revenues in China via music piracy. And they couldn&#8217;t even do that properly as they&#8217;ve been found guilty as hell by a Chinese court.
If credit is to be accorded to Jerry Yang for brokering the China deal &#8211; and as Yahoo is obviously benefiting from it financially &#8211; he is also complicit in benefiting from music piracy on the side also. 
Sadly, this seems to be how the business model works: US investment money funds a lot of the piracy in China, US investors make a killing, and then the US government goes after China in the WTO kangaroo court.
And since Yahoo Music&#8217;s Ian Rogers has already laid out his expected moral standards in his famous blog piece, it is time for him examine his own house a little more and clear some of the existing duplicity
[Before anyone cleverly points out that the Alibaba IPO does not include the Yahoo China part, it was still the same deal that brought Yahoo in in the first place]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
