<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Q3: Not Bad, But The Fight Goes On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lucido</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/#comment-620452</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lucido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/#comment-620452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was a bit baffled by the market reaction. Check out the unimpressive trends here: http://research.investingminds.com/Y/Yahoo_(YHOO)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They&#039;re adding headcount faster than revenue. And what is with this ex-TAC revenue? Any non-GAAP number in my opinion is suspect. Adding back the traffic acquisition costs allows them to cover up any sins associated with overpaying for traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit baffled by the market reaction. Check out the unimpressive trends here: <a href="http://research.investingminds.com/Y/Yahoo_(YHOO)" rel="nofollow">http://research.investingminds.com/Y/Yahoo_(YHOO)</a></p>

<p>They&#8217;re adding headcount faster than revenue. And what is with this ex-TAC revenue? Any non-GAAP number in my opinion is suspect. Adding back the traffic acquisition costs allows them to cover up any sins associated with overpaying for traffic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhiren</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/#comment-615592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhiren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/#comment-615592</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo was basking in glory of being a web giant, before google came on. But, I guess now they are concentrating on technology and correct business model.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo was basking in glory of being a web giant, before google came on. But, I guess now they are concentrating on technology and correct business model.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sibs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/#comment-614994</link>
		<dc:creator>Sibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/16/yahoo-q3-not-bad-but-why-the-weak-cash-flow/#comment-614994</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is what Yahoo gets (weak cash flow) for putting &quot;fillers&quot; in their Yahoo Personals section which is a pretend-to-be dating web service. Yahoo has been known for using &quot;fillers&quot; (or essentially fake posts of women) to try and rip off men making them believe there are more women who have signed up for their Personals service. Shame on Yahoo and great to see Jerry Yang getting whaled on for allowing his company to get away with bad business practices like this!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what Yahoo gets (weak cash flow) for putting &#8220;fillers&#8221; in their Yahoo Personals section which is a pretend-to-be dating web service. Yahoo has been known for using &#8220;fillers&#8221; (or essentially fake posts of women) to try and rip off men making them believe there are more women who have signed up for their Personals service. Shame on Yahoo and great to see Jerry Yang getting whaled on for allowing his company to get away with bad business practices like this!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
