<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube AdSense or AdSnore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Umesh Sirsiwal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-887274</link>
		<dc:creator>Umesh Sirsiwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-887274</guid>
		<description>Here is my experience with adding youtube units to my site. 
http://kashi.webhop.net/blog/Technology/index.php/archives/38.
I have decided to keep these units on my site just to understand how optimal the ads are. So far I am not very happy with these ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my experience with adding youtube units to my site.<br />
 (<a href="http://kashi.webhop.net/blog/Technology/index.php/archives/38" rel="nofollow">link</a>) .<br />
I have decided to keep these units on my site just to understand how optimal the ads are. So far I am not very happy with these ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave from WelcomeBackRosenthal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-867844</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave from WelcomeBackRosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-867844</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi
I know it's super long time after the original post. But I did try the video ads because on some level it DOES some like a good idea; people love short interesting videos. But what I found was that if Google couldn't find a matching ad they would just serve up a black screen. So no money there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the reason I wanted that solution to work is because my content matching is SO bad. It's the search for the fix for that brought me to this site.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I know it&#8217;s super long time after the original post. But I did try the video ads because on some level it DOES some like a good idea; people love short interesting videos. But what I found was that if Google couldn&#8217;t find a matching ad they would just serve up a black screen. So no money there.</p>
<p>And the reason I wanted that solution to work is because my content matching is SO bad. It&#8217;s the search for the fix for that brought me to this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Do I Become A YouTube Partner?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-815180</link>
		<dc:creator>How Do I Become A YouTube Partner?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-815180</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Of course, the problem with this is that this is hard, hard work&#8230; to make those videos. So many will write this off not going to work. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, the problem with this is that this is hard, hard work&#8230; to make those videos. So many will write this off not going to work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chetan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-604669</link>
		<dc:creator>Chetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-604669</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1.I think it is indeed a big deal, YouTube and AdSense combined together is a vast network. Also Google is a "No Evil" company, the program will be further extended to small and mid size artists / publishers, just wait.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2.AdSense so far is the best available product in the market when it comes to delivering context sensitive ads. AdContext &#38; AdCenter are good for nothing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3.The product as a whole lacks Google's WOW factor, but for sure they are going to monetize it now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.I think it is indeed a big deal, YouTube and AdSense combined together is a vast network. Also Google is a &#8220;No Evil&#8221; company, the program will be further extended to small and mid size artists / publishers, just wait.</p>
<p>2.AdSense so far is the best available product in the market when it comes to delivering context sensitive ads. AdContext &amp; AdCenter are good for nothing.</p>
<p>3.The product as a whole lacks Google&#8217;s WOW factor, but for sure they are going to monetize it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603928</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603928</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Sramana - Rhona Mitra on your website is definitely funnier than Adsense putting M&#38;A and VC accountant ads on my blogger blog for digital media(350 plus entries  with digital media topics - only input into that "adsense-less" alogrithm is one word in my profile for private equity)- and they keep serving up those useless ads day after day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yup - I have made a whole $7.02 from that "money machine".  My grandkids might get a surprise check for $100 when it hits that limit in a few decades!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sramana - Rhona Mitra on your website is definitely funnier than Adsense putting M&amp;A and VC accountant ads on my blogger blog for digital media(350 plus entries  with digital media topics - only input into that &#8220;adsense-less&#8221; alogrithm is one word in my profile for private equity)- and they keep serving up those useless ads day after day.</p>
<p>Yup - I have made a whole $7.02 from that &#8220;money machine&#8221;.  My grandkids might get a surprise check for $100 when it hits that limit in a few decades!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sramana Mitra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603898</link>
		<dc:creator>Sramana Mitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603898</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, AdSense has the most ridiculous targeting and monetization engine, Om. I don't know many people other than you, who makes any money off them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now they are advertising "Rhona Mitra" on my site. LOL!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sramana&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, AdSense has the most ridiculous targeting and monetization engine, Om. I don&#8217;t know many people other than you, who makes any money off them.</p>
<p>Now they are advertising &#8220;Rhona Mitra&#8221; on my site. LOL!</p>
<p>Sramana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Democracy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603707</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603707</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Links YouTube-AdSense With "Video Units"&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At long last Google has taken a major step toward monetizing it's $1.65 billion YouTube acquisition. The search giant announced this morning the launch of "video units," a program that allows websites to embed relevant video content from YouTube in...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Links YouTube-AdSense With &#8220;Video Units&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>At long last Google has taken a major step toward monetizing it&#8217;s $1.65 billion YouTube acquisition. The search giant announced this morning the launch of &#8220;video units,&#8221; a program that allows websites to embed relevant video content from YouTube in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakshan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603659</link>
		<dc:creator>rakshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;YouTube + AdSense makes total sense.
What you've got in YouTube is a cool video delivery infrastructure, and it would work well for one of the largest advertising mediums : TV ads. Imagine tapping into that sort of ad network and making it available over the web. Take that one step ahead and open it up for user-generated ads (for just about anything) and you have a very cool way of distributing rich-media ads (and im not talking flash) over the web.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube + AdSense makes total sense.<br />
What you&#8217;ve got in YouTube is a cool video delivery infrastructure, and it would work well for one of the largest advertising mediums : TV ads. Imagine tapping into that sort of ad network and making it available over the web. Take that one step ahead and open it up for user-generated ads (for just about anything) and you have a very cool way of distributing rich-media ads (and im not talking flash) over the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New From Google Labs: Google Big Friggin&#8217; Video Ad &#124; Digital Daily &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603619</link>
		<dc:creator>New From Google Labs: Google Big Friggin&#8217; Video Ad &#124; Digital Daily &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] and Google Video in violation of copyright (though Daily Motion apparently has), but it may have finally figured out something far more important: how to advertise on it. This morning, the company announced a new service that allows publishers [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Google Video in violation of copyright (though Daily Motion apparently has), but it may have finally figured out something far more important: how to advertise on it. This morning, the company announced a new service that allows publishers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apogee Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603597</link>
		<dc:creator>Apogee Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603597</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;google.com/videounits - AdSense Video Units Launch Glitch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;... seen how they perform for AdWords advertisers. In the meantime, I think Om Malik has some of the most interesting commentary on the launch: YouTube AdSense or Add Snore.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>google.com/videounits - AdSense Video Units Launch Glitch</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; seen how they perform for AdWords advertisers. In the meantime, I think Om Malik has some of the most interesting commentary on the launch: YouTube AdSense or Add Snore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Z</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603576</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603576</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with your points.  I always thought this was the way for Google to monetize YouTube:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.stockmarketbites.com/2007/10/google-tries-again-with-youtube.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with your points.  I always thought this was the way for Google to monetize YouTube:</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.stockmarketbites.com/2007/10/google-tries-again-with-youtube.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyclepromo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603565</link>
		<dc:creator>cyclepromo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No one is lining up to buy this offering. I hope they aren't working these sales into any long term sales projections. They might not crack $1000 in stock value if they keep coming out with crap like this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is lining up to buy this offering. I hope they aren&#8217;t working these sales into any long term sales projections. They might not crack $1000 in stock value if they keep coming out with crap like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603471</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603471</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OM - you are on point!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OM - you are on point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603446</link>
		<dc:creator>Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603446</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The YouTube-AdSense death toll&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over at the Techmemeograph, the news that Google is going to going to slap banner ads above some YouTube videos and syndicate them through its AdSense network is being duplicated endlessly. "Here comes the money," declares Marshall Kirkpatrick. Maybe...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The YouTube-AdSense death toll</strong></p>
<p>Over at the Techmemeograph, the news that Google is going to going to slap banner ads above some YouTube videos and syndicate them through its AdSense network is being duplicated endlessly. &#8220;Here comes the money,&#8221; declares Marshall Kirkpatrick. Maybe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wilde</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603397</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603397</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think there are several more challenges with this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Google continues to believe that ultimately the big media companies will accept disintermediation of their business models-not going to happen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Google continues to view publishers as simply raw material for their business models.  Publishers will demand control over what content gets shown on their site, and Google will be very slow to provide them with any sort of control.  As a result this will see slow adoption by publishers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om:</p>
<p>I think there are several more challenges with this:</p>
<p>-Google continues to believe that ultimately the big media companies will accept disintermediation of their business models-not going to happen.</p>
<p>-Google continues to view publishers as simply raw material for their business models.  Publishers will demand control over what content gets shown on their site, and Google will be very slow to provide them with any sort of control.  As a result this will see slow adoption by publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spandana</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603379</link>
		<dc:creator>Spandana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-video-adsense/#comment-603379</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;since this is such a intricate mix of content and ads (as opposed to adsense, which was purely ads), site owners will need a lot more control over what's in the content.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;if google is suspect about matching the ads to content (as adsense does), i don't think it's a good idea to attempt to match content to content! site owners are very picky about the content, and even mighty google even with all it's brain-yard probably isn't quite there to please them just yet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;it would've been nicer if they let the publishers browse the sponsored videos and pick the ones that they wanted to play on their site. i for one would be willing to do it..!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since this is such a intricate mix of content and ads (as opposed to adsense, which was purely ads), site owners will need a lot more control over what&#8217;s in the content.</p>
<p>if google is suspect about matching the ads to content (as adsense does), i don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a good idea to attempt to match content to content! site owners are very picky about the content, and even mighty google even with all it&#8217;s brain-yard probably isn&#8217;t quite there to please them just yet.</p>
<p>it would&#8217;ve been nicer if they let the publishers browse the sponsored videos and pick the ones that they wanted to play on their site. i for one would be willing to do it..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
