<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: How High Can It Go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple: Insanely Great Stock &#187; Webomatica - Entertainment and Tech Digest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple: Insanely Great Stock &#187; Webomatica - Entertainment and Tech Digest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] we have Google nearing $600 and there was even some ridiculous talk of it reaching $2000 a share. I&#8217;m wondering if [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we have Google nearing $600 and there was even some ridiculous talk of it reaching $2000 a share. I&#8217;m wondering if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day Google is still a search engine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A high percentage (97 to 98% don&#039;t know exact figure) of Google&#039;s revenue still comes from search related ads like (ad sense etc).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other players in the market e.g. Microsoft and Yahoo are already trying to snatch a piece of the ad revenue from Google in a very aggressive way. The recent alliance of Microsoft and Facebook case and point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is very obvious Google is trying to diversify, using its success in the search space as leverage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The most recent attempt by Google to diversify and have a shot at Microsoft at the same time has been the launch of Office applications as a hosted service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A lot of pundits on the web have already commented that many in the past have tried and failed miserably when trying to take on Microsoft’s office suit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An office application as a service is a good idea for small to medium businesses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No need to worry about upgrades, backup, disaster recovery, setting up networks etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If one is going to use Google hosted apps in their business, they must ask themselves a few questions before they dive in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once you are tied into Google apps, can you opt out? I.E can you download all your documents and start using them in MS Word.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Similarly can I upload all my existing documents and load them into Google apps and will all my links and other embedded objects, macros etc work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Portability is the question here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google may slowly tighten the screws forced by shareholder pressure and increase the price of hosted apps; at this point can you opt out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You might be in so deep that you may be forced to pay the increase, rather than move to another provider. At least with desktop apps you can choose not to upgrade for a while.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your internet connection is down will your business still is able to function if you are so reliant on hosted apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In a medium to large scale business can you afford to have two version of Word, Excel etc since the hosted app may not satisfy everyone’s needs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This then leads to the issue of training and support.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you train some of your staff in Google apps and some in Microsoft apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does the support desk staff get trained in answering Google apps queries or Ms Office apps queries.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Email as a hosted app works well since there is a standard mail protocol underneath it all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If there was a standard protocol for Word, Excel, PowerPoint etc now that would be something.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The thing is MS Office suite like it or not has become the de facto standard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagine scenario where a company which uses Google apps sends a Google word app document to another company to modify which does not use Google apps, how will this work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am not affiliated with either Microsoft or Google in any way.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day Google is still a search engine.</p>
<p>A high percentage (97 to 98% don&#8217;t know exact figure) of Google&#8217;s revenue still comes from search related ads like (ad sense etc).</p>
<p>Other players in the market e.g. Microsoft and Yahoo are already trying to snatch a piece of the ad revenue from Google in a very aggressive way. The recent alliance of Microsoft and Facebook case and point.</p>
<p>It is very obvious Google is trying to diversify, using its success in the search space as leverage.</p>
<p>The most recent attempt by Google to diversify and have a shot at Microsoft at the same time has been the launch of Office applications as a hosted service.</p>
<p>A lot of pundits on the web have already commented that many in the past have tried and failed miserably when trying to take on Microsoft’s office suit.</p>
<p>An office application as a service is a good idea for small to medium businesses.</p>
<p>No need to worry about upgrades, backup, disaster recovery, setting up networks etc.</p>
<p>If one is going to use Google hosted apps in their business, they must ask themselves a few questions before they dive in.</p>
<p>Once you are tied into Google apps, can you opt out? I.E can you download all your documents and start using them in MS Word.</p>
<p>Similarly can I upload all my existing documents and load them into Google apps and will all my links and other embedded objects, macros etc work.</p>
<p>Portability is the question here.</p>
<p>Google may slowly tighten the screws forced by shareholder pressure and increase the price of hosted apps; at this point can you opt out.</p>
<p>You might be in so deep that you may be forced to pay the increase, rather than move to another provider. At least with desktop apps you can choose not to upgrade for a while.</p>
<p>If your internet connection is down will your business still is able to function if you are so reliant on hosted apps.</p>
<p>In a medium to large scale business can you afford to have two version of Word, Excel etc since the hosted app may not satisfy everyone’s needs.</p>
<p>This then leads to the issue of training and support.</p>
<p>Do you train some of your staff in Google apps and some in Microsoft apps.</p>
<p>Does the support desk staff get trained in answering Google apps queries or Ms Office apps queries.</p>
<p>Email as a hosted app works well since there is a standard mail protocol underneath it all.</p>
<p>If there was a standard protocol for Word, Excel, PowerPoint etc now that would be something.</p>
<p>The thing is MS Office suite like it or not has become the de facto standard.</p>
<p>Imagine scenario where a company which uses Google apps sends a Google word app document to another company to modify which does not use Google apps, how will this work.</p>
<p>I am not affiliated with either Microsoft or Google in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homo Homini Lupus</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homo Homini Lupus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Que puedes comprar con lo que vale Google en&#160;WallStreet?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Leí el día de hoy en GigaOM que las acciones de Google alcanzaron el precio record de 600.00 dólares por acción el día de hoy capitalizando el valor de la empresa en 188,100 millones de dólares.
Om Malik dice que podrías comprar por esa cantida...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Que puedes comprar con lo que vale Google en&nbsp;WallStreet?</strong></p>
<p>Leí el día de hoy en GigaOM que las acciones de Google alcanzaron el precio record de 600.00 dólares por acción el día de hoy capitalizando el valor de la empresa en 188,100 millones de dólares.<br />
Om Malik dice que podrías comprar por esa cantida&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google alza de acciones &#171; Por ahora sin tìtulo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google alza de acciones &#171; Por ahora sin tìtulo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] alza de&#160;acciones Veo un post vía Om Malik que me hizo pensar bastante, concretamente en cual es techo de crecimiento de una empresa, en el [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alza de&nbsp;acciones Veo un post vía Om Malik que me hizo pensar bastante, concretamente en cual es techo de crecimiento de una empresa, en el [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wirelessman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wirelessman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Seconding Lance&#039;s comment on buying Ireland. The total assets in a country are much more than the annual GDP. Ireland&#039;s residential real estate stock alone (about 550K homes @ 300000 euros each on average) is worth about 230 billion. Add to that all commercial and government real-estate, capital equipment, private belongings, vehicles etc. and you&#039;re probably talking somewhere north of a trillion.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seconding Lance&#8217;s comment on buying Ireland. The total assets in a country are much more than the annual GDP. Ireland&#8217;s residential real estate stock alone (about 550K homes @ 300000 euros each on average) is worth about 230 billion. Add to that all commercial and government real-estate, capital equipment, private belongings, vehicles etc. and you&#8217;re probably talking somewhere north of a trillion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;ummm.... OM Malik why are you thanking Rein Harden.  You had it right.  940K = 940,000.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm&#8230;. OM Malik why are you thanking Rein Harden.  You had it right.  940K = 940,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Center Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Data Center Knowledge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Stock Tops $600 A Share&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shares of Google (GOOG) gained $15.57 yesterday to close at $609.62 a share, its first close above $600 per share.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Stock Tops $600 A Share</strong></p>
<p>Shares of Google (GOOG) gained $15.57 yesterday to close at $609.62 a share, its first close above $600 per share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Google has a shot of hitting $1000/share by late 2009: http://fishtrain.com/2007/10/08/google-at-1000share/&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has a shot of hitting $1000/share by late 2009: <a href="http://fishtrain.com/2007/10/08/google-at-1000share/" rel="nofollow">http://fishtrain.com/2007/10/08/google-at-1000share/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Lindzon &#187; BEARS...They Shit in the Woods and Buy Puts in October</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Lindzon &#187; BEARS...They Shit in the Woods and Buy Puts in October]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] I just think that we got our &#8216;Crash&#8217; early this year&#8230;like August. Nobody is expecting upside surprises&#8230;like Google buying Ireland for starters . [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just think that we got our &#8216;Crash&#8217; early this year&#8230;like August. Nobody is expecting upside surprises&#8230;like Google buying Ireland for starters . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Lance&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good point... i was just having a little fun. i kinda know the difference but man, $188 billion is one big number. for a market cap and what not. i am impressed how far this baby has run... and it doesn&#039;t seem to be stopping.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance</p>
<p>Good point&#8230; i was just having a little fun. i kinda know the difference but man, $188 billion is one big number. for a market cap and what not. i am impressed how far this baby has run&#8230; and it doesn&#8217;t seem to be stopping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Rein harden.... good catch. thanks man. appreciate the fact check.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rein harden&#8230;. good catch. thanks man. appreciate the fact check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup Sharma</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anup Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;GOOG has been out performing all the market indices S&amp;P 500, NASDAQ and Dow Jones. This remarkable run is likely to continue in the future as well. As for me I am Bullish as ever with this stock!!!!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOG has been out performing all the market indices S&amp;P 500, NASDAQ and Dow Jones. This remarkable run is likely to continue in the future as well. As for me I am Bullish as ever with this stock!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jazz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 01:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Google will keep rocking towards the $1000 level as long as the money managers on Wall St  keep seeing an increase in earnings. if its organic growth in earning it&#039;ll just keep rocking. One slow down and ride is over.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will keep rocking towards the $1000 level as long as the money managers on Wall St  keep seeing an increase in earnings. if its organic growth in earning it&#8217;ll just keep rocking. One slow down and ride is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ajay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This is the peak, it&#039;s all downhill from here.  GOOG jumped 20% in the last month or two on what?  Nothing.  Basically, GOOG is THE internet play for a whole bunch of morons who want a play in the internet sector and GOOG is the only option, as they&#039;re the only ones who make any money.  As such, the stock is highly inflated and the slightest prick will cause all the hot air to come flying out.  I predict that prick will be the copyright lawsuits from Viacom and others and that they will burst the bubble pretty quickly.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the peak, it&#8217;s all downhill from here.  GOOG jumped 20% in the last month or two on what?  Nothing.  Basically, GOOG is THE internet play for a whole bunch of morons who want a play in the internet sector and GOOG is the only option, as they&#8217;re the only ones who make any money.  As such, the stock is highly inflated and the slightest prick will cause all the hot air to come flying out.  I predict that prick will be the copyright lawsuits from Viacom and others and that they will burst the bubble pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sketching</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sketching]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interesting list of comparisons.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting list of comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Knobel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance Knobel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/10/08/google-600/#comment-182065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I know you&#039;re being tongue in cheek, but don&#039;t confuse GDP with the &quot;price&quot; of a country. The US GDP is around $13 trillion, but there is much, much more than $13 trillion of assets in the US. GDP measures the total value added in an economy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lots of business magazines get this wrong as well, with ridiculous statements like ExxonMobil is bigger than all but 16 countries. That equates GDP with annual revenues, which is also a canard.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you&#8217;re being tongue in cheek, but don&#8217;t confuse GDP with the &#8220;price&#8221; of a country. The US GDP is around $13 trillion, but there is much, much more than $13 trillion of assets in the US. GDP measures the total value added in an economy.</p>
<p>Lots of business magazines get this wrong as well, with ridiculous statements like ExxonMobil is bigger than all but 16 countries. That equates GDP with annual revenues, which is also a canard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

