<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iRobot and the Frankenstein Complex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-596011</link>
		<dc:creator>Elad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-596011</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting analysis. One possible conclusion is that iRobot might do well to just change their name to something that doesn&#039;t involve robots. The Hollywood inspired robot dread is probably directed towards humanoid robots, which the iroomba definitely isn&#039;t.
The only difference between an iroomba and, say a washing machine, is that the former has to move around your house. A technological achievement, no doubt, but hardly a big step towards strong AI IMHO.
Maybe if they called it an &quot;automatic vacuum cleaner&quot;, then the mass market, focused on utility rather than novelty, would be moved into buying rather than dreading.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis. One possible conclusion is that iRobot might do well to just change their name to something that doesn&#8217;t involve robots. The Hollywood inspired robot dread is probably directed towards humanoid robots, which the iroomba definitely isn&#8217;t.
The only difference between an iroomba and, say a washing machine, is that the former has to move around your house. A technological achievement, no doubt, but hardly a big step towards strong AI IMHO.
Maybe if they called it an &#8220;automatic vacuum cleaner&#8221;, then the mass market, focused on utility rather than novelty, would be moved into buying rather than dreading.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590345</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think iRobot&#039;s travails have nothing to do with any kind of fear of robots, although that certainly is an imaginative explanation. Their problem is that their robots aren&#039;t useful enough. Do they have a Roomba that can climb stairs yet? What about a robot that can do the laundry (including ironing/pressing)? How about a robot that can walk the dog and pick up its poop? How about a robot chauffeur? How about a robot cook? When they actually have such robots, people will want to buy them and, yes, some people will be afraid/revolted by them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think iRobot&#8217;s travails have nothing to do with any kind of fear of robots, although that certainly is an imaginative explanation. Their problem is that their robots aren&#8217;t useful enough. Do they have a Roomba that can climb stairs yet? What about a robot that can do the laundry (including ironing/pressing)? How about a robot that can walk the dog and pick up its poop? How about a robot chauffeur? How about a robot cook? When they actually have such robots, people will want to buy them and, yes, some people will be afraid/revolted by them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Schmelzer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590254</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Schmelzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Those short-term issues reflected in the stock price are very real, but have to do with the summer handoff to Roomba revision 2 and the company letting its gross margins deteriorate as the old version sat on the shelf.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regarding Samir&#039;s negative comments, we don&#039;t know his circumstances or whether he represents a niche or the mainstream.  Not everyone needs or wants an iPhone either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But to be clear, I&#039;m not as sure as you are that iRobot&#039;s long-term prospects are bright.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those short-term issues reflected in the stock price are very real, but have to do with the summer handoff to Roomba revision 2 and the company letting its gross margins deteriorate as the old version sat on the shelf.</p>

<p>Regarding Samir&#8217;s negative comments, we don&#8217;t know his circumstances or whether he represents a niche or the mainstream.  Not everyone needs or wants an iPhone either.</p>

<p>But to be clear, I&#8217;m not as sure as you are that iRobot&#8217;s long-term prospects are bright.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590180</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590180</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is too early and it isn&#039;t. As I said, iRobot has tremendous long-term potential. But there are short-term issues that need to be resolved to fulfill it. Comments like Samir&#039;s - which sadly are not as scarce as they should be - are another example of that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>

<p>It is too early and it isn&#8217;t. As I said, iRobot has tremendous long-term potential. But there are short-term issues that need to be resolved to fulfill it. Comments like Samir&#8217;s &#8211; which sadly are not as scarce as they should be &#8211; are another example of that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Schmelzer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590143</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Schmelzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-590143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s way too early in iRobot&#039;s life to draw any conclusions.  The company&#039;s sales have increased about 1200% over the last 6 years, after all.  And the vast majority of its sales so far have been in the US.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The ConnectR is a pretty weird robot, but so was R2D2 and we still somehow managed to think it cute after a scene or two.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s way too early in iRobot&#8217;s life to draw any conclusions.  The company&#8217;s sales have increased about 1200% over the last 6 years, after all.  And the vast majority of its sales so far have been in the US.</p>

<p>The ConnectR is a pretty weird robot, but so was R2D2 and we still somehow managed to think it cute after a scene or two.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samir Jalloul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-589188</link>
		<dc:creator>Samir Jalloul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-589188</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I personally feel that this product is much of a novelty than an upright vacuum a floor moper or anything useful to me as a consumer.  In plain and simple terms this product is not effective and does not improve my immediate situation!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally feel that this product is much of a novelty than an upright vacuum a floor moper or anything useful to me as a consumer.  In plain and simple terms this product is not effective and does not improve my immediate situation!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-589095</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-589095</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;True, I ignored it because it was a military contract and I was talking about iRobot&#039;s consumer business.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The loss of that contract caused IRBT to fall from $24 to $18, but considering that the stock once traded at $37 there&#039;s something else going on.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, I ignored it because it was a military contract and I was talking about iRobot&#8217;s consumer business.</p>

<p>The loss of that contract caused IRBT to fall from $24 to $18, but considering that the stock once traded at $37 there&#8217;s something else going on.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-588861</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/30/irobot-and-the-frankenstein-complex/#comment-588861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Author seems to have totally ignored the fact that iRobot lost a defense contract to its competitor RobotFx. The value of contract is 280 million dollars. IMHO the movement in the stock price seems to be a reaction to that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(http://www2.fbo.gov/spg/USA/STRICOM/W900KK/Awards/W900KK%2D07%2DD%2D0004LnAll%5FCLINS.html)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Moreover iRobot has slapped RobotFX with a lawsuit accusing it of stealing Intellectual property. More details can be found in following link&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/24/judge-asks-for-more-information-on-venue-issue-in-irobot-robotic-fx-case/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author seems to have totally ignored the fact that iRobot lost a defense contract to its competitor RobotFx. The value of contract is 280 million dollars. IMHO the movement in the stock price seems to be a reaction to that.</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www2.fbo.gov/spg/USA/STRICOM/W900KK/Awards/W900KK%2D07%2DD%2D0004LnAll%5FCLINS.html" rel="nofollow">http://www2.fbo.gov/spg/USA/STRICOM/W900KK/Awards/W900KK%2D07%2DD%2D0004LnAll%5FCLINS.html</a>)</p>

<p>Moreover iRobot has slapped RobotFX with a lawsuit accusing it of stealing Intellectual property. More details can be found in following link</p>

<p><a href="http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/24/judge-asks-for-more-information-on-venue-issue-in-irobot-robotic-fx-case/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/24/judge-asks-for-more-information-on-venue-issue-in-irobot-robotic-fx-case/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
