<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Tips To Spot A Hot (or Not) IPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:57:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-586730</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-586730</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;matthew and dan,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the zappa fan in me made me reach for that phrase, &quot;only in it for the money&quot;. the key word in this case being &quot;only.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matthew and dan,</p>

<p>the zappa fan in me made me reach for that phrase, &#8220;only in it for the money&#8221;. the key word in this case being &#8220;only.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew johnson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-586349</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-586349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;excuse me: KEVIN  has a good point&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excuse me: KEVIN  has a good point</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew johnson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-586347</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-586347</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@dan:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;it&#039;s execs in a &#039;typical&#039; private, venture-backed technology company filing for an ipo making $500K or $1M salary before the ipo that is a red-flag. there are plenty of special situations like a company that is ipo&#039;ing after being taken private where exec salaries over $500K are nothing - but om&#039;s got a good point for the more typical case. i think the red flag might be more correctly &#039;taking too much cash out&#039; rather than &#039;in it for the money&#039;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://mattishness.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dan:</p>

<p>it&#8217;s execs in a &#8216;typical&#8217; private, venture-backed technology company filing for an ipo making $500K or $1M salary before the ipo that is a red-flag. there are plenty of special situations like a company that is ipo&#8217;ing after being taken private where exec salaries over $500K are nothing &#8211; but om&#8217;s got a good point for the more typical case. i think the red flag might be more correctly &#8216;taking too much cash out&#8217; rather than &#8216;in it for the money&#8217;</p>

<p><a href="http://mattishness.com" rel="nofollow">http://mattishness.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Equity HUB - peHUB First Read</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-585464</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Equity HUB - peHUB First Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-585464</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] * Five tops to spot a hot (or not) IPO. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * Five tops to spot a hot (or not) IPO. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-585286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-585286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&#039;Salaries above $500,000 - and especially $1 million - can be a warning that managers are only in it for the money.&#039;&lt;/i&gt;
Yes, and here&#039;s another warning sign that managers are only in it for the money: that it&#039;s a company.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8216;Salaries above $500,000 &#8211; and especially $1 million &#8211; can be a warning that managers are only in it for the money.&#8217;</i>
Yes, and here&#8217;s another warning sign that managers are only in it for the money: that it&#8217;s a company.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100rabh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-585285</link>
		<dc:creator>100rabh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/28/hot-ipo/#comment-585285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see all tips as 1 ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see all tips as 1 ;-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
