<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vonage: How Low Can You Go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Untangled &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally a patent settlement where Vonage doesn't shell out money</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Untangled &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally a patent settlement where Vonage doesn't shell out money]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Om thinks that Vonage&#8217;s problem is playing the cheap voice game, but Vonage&#8217;s primary risk is not cost management (OK marketing/advertising costs has always been an issue), but that Vonage has no Intellectual Property protection. So far mainly the service providers have filed patent infringement lawsuits, but there are many equipment vendors and with many VoIP patents (much like Nortel) who could go after Vonage. Vonage still has many challenges ahead of it, but this settlement gives it yet another breather. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om thinks that Vonage&#8217;s problem is playing the cheap voice game, but Vonage&#8217;s primary risk is not cost management (OK marketing/advertising costs has always been an issue), but that Vonage has no Intellectual Property protection. So far mainly the service providers have filed patent infringement lawsuits, but there are many equipment vendors and with many VoIP patents (much like Nortel) who could go after Vonage. Vonage still has many challenges ahead of it, but this settlement gives it yet another breather. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And Now Its AT&#38;T&#8217;s Turn To Sue Vonage &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[And Now Its AT&#38;T&#8217;s Turn To Sue Vonage &#171; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] was ordered to pay $66 million to Verizon, and it recently settled its case with Sprint for around $80 million. AT&amp;T, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was ordered to pay $66 million to Verizon, and it recently settled its case with Sprint for around $80 million. AT&amp;T, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprint Patents Get Vonage Cash &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sprint Patents Get Vonage Cash &#171; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] The agreement is valued at $80 million: $35 million for past license use, $40 million for a fully paid future license, and a $5 million prepayment for services. On Sept. 25, a Kansas jury handed down a verdict finding that Holmdel, N.J.-based Vonage had infringed six of Sprint&#8217;s patents. Vonage was asked to pay $69.5 million in damages. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The agreement is valued at $80 million: $35 million for past license use, $40 million for a fully paid future license, and a $5 million prepayment for services. On Sept. 25, a Kansas jury handed down a verdict finding that Holmdel, N.J.-based Vonage had infringed six of Sprint&#8217;s patents. Vonage was asked to pay $69.5 million in damages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype loses its hype</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype loses its hype]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] VoIP providers, Vonage, is losing patent-infringement lawsuits filed by Sprint and Verizon. Here&#8217;s Malik&#8217;s summary from 25 September. Vonage lost its CEO in April, and is struggling to keep [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VoIP providers, Vonage, is losing patent-infringement lawsuits filed by Sprint and Verizon. Here&#8217;s Malik&#8217;s summary from 25 September. Vonage lost its CEO in April, and is struggling to keep [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Arango</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martha Arango]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t think this is Vonage. It looks totally different. Kind of cool though if all these services are actually integrated. Have you found out already who this is?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think this is Vonage. It looks totally different. Kind of cool though if all these services are actually integrated. Have you found out already who this is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Could this be Vonage - DOn&#039;t really believe they would continue developing, but you never know what they have up there probably very long sleeves: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19165054-Skype-Video-leak-Whos-taking-up-a-battle-with-skype
They show a video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IjpznRxNLY
Who knows more?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be Vonage &#8211; DOn&#8217;t really believe they would continue developing, but you never know what they have up there probably very long sleeves: <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19165054-Skype-Video-leak-Whos-taking-up-a-battle-with-skype" rel="nofollow">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19165054-Skype-Video-leak-Whos-taking-up-a-battle-with-skype</a><br />
They show a video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IjpznRxNLY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IjpznRxNLY</a><br />
Who knows more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Falls</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Falls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t agree with Mr. Seng above. Competitors equipped with a stable network and available technology and that can offer similar or same pricing have an opportunity to become &quot;the other&quot; VoIP until Vonage&#039;s legal woes show their full results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I recall correctly, I read recently someone else is suing Vonage for another patent infringement thing. This looks very good for competition.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with Mr. Seng above. Competitors equipped with a stable network and available technology and that can offer similar or same pricing have an opportunity to become &#8220;the other&#8221; VoIP until Vonage&#8217;s legal woes show their full results.</p>
<p>If I recall correctly, I read recently someone else is suing Vonage for another patent infringement thing. This looks very good for competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leveraging VoIP for click to call technology &#124; The Foo Logs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leveraging VoIP for click to call technology &#124; The Foo Logs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] traditional VoIP providers and the popular peer to peer provider Skype. With VoIP providers like Vonage in trouble and SunRocket shutting down unexpectedly, this might be a good route to go without the monthly [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] traditional VoIP providers and the popular peer to peer provider Skype. With VoIP providers like Vonage in trouble and SunRocket shutting down unexpectedly, this might be a good route to go without the monthly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;My family and I have loved our Vonage service. It&#039;s been the best phone service we&#039;ve had for the past three years. It&#039;d be sad to see it go. I have Skype In/Out as well, and Vonage blows it away for call quality to standard phone lines. (At least with my ISP, Time/Warner Cable in Dayton, Ohio.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the thing here is that if the traditional land line and cell phone companies are successful in bringing down VoIP&#039;s premier brand, then they will be emboldened to take down the rest. I feel that Skype in the U.S. should get ready for trouble. They are next. (Will eBay be willing to fight for Skype after their ill-fitting marriage?)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know that technically Skype is a different system, but these broad patent interpretations will put all VoIP phone and voice chat services in danger if Vonage falls. I dare say that the phone companies will take on Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo!, AOL and Google next if they have a successful attack on Skype.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Basically if you transmit a voice over the internet, you could get dragged to court if the phone companies wish to. That&#039;s how broad these patent interpretations could get.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My family and I have loved our Vonage service. It&#8217;s been the best phone service we&#8217;ve had for the past three years. It&#8217;d be sad to see it go. I have Skype In/Out as well, and Vonage blows it away for call quality to standard phone lines. (At least with my ISP, Time/Warner Cable in Dayton, Ohio.)</p>
<p>Anyway, the thing here is that if the traditional land line and cell phone companies are successful in bringing down VoIP&#8217;s premier brand, then they will be emboldened to take down the rest. I feel that Skype in the U.S. should get ready for trouble. They are next. (Will eBay be willing to fight for Skype after their ill-fitting marriage?)</p>
<p>I know that technically Skype is a different system, but these broad patent interpretations will put all VoIP phone and voice chat services in danger if Vonage falls. I dare say that the phone companies will take on Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo!, AOL and Google next if they have a successful attack on Skype.</p>
<p>Basically if you transmit a voice over the internet, you could get dragged to court if the phone companies wish to. That&#8217;s how broad these patent interpretations could get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/25/vonage-sprint/#comment-181131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;So here is a good question.  Is it best to jump ship with Vonage now or wait to they go under so we can take advantage of the special deals that will come up for former Vonage customers like the one Net2Phone has now for SunRocket customers?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here is a good question.  Is it best to jump ship with Vonage now or wait to they go under so we can take advantage of the special deals that will come up for former Vonage customers like the one Net2Phone has now for SunRocket customers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
