<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Much For A Microsoft-Cisco Peace Accord</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Earnhardt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Earnhardt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would also draw your attention to this blog post by MSFT&#039;s head UC guru where he says, SURPRISE!, that software is most important for UC and networks are just &quot;plumbing.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/uc/archive/2007/08/16/software-the-medium-to-greater-business-value-with-communications.aspx&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We never said we would not compete.  Competition, as you know, drives innovation and that&#039;s where customers gain.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om:</p>
<p>I would also draw your attention to this blog post by MSFT&#8217;s head UC guru where he says, SURPRISE!, that software is most important for UC and networks are just &#8220;plumbing.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/uc/archive/2007/08/16/software-the-medium-to-greater-business-value-with-communications.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.technet.com/uc/archive/2007/08/16/software-the-medium-to-greater-business-value-with-communications.aspx</a></p>
<p>We never said we would not compete.  Competition, as you know, drives innovation and that&#8217;s where customers gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuvamani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuvamani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree with &quot;shmoe&quot;. The pact is only for interoperability. This is to take on the open source solutions like asterisk which by virtue of being open, are more flexible****
By allowing interoperability more units of both cisco and msft products will be sold. This does not mean that cisco and msft will not compete with each other.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with &#8220;shmoe&#8221;. The pact is only for interoperability. This is to take on the open source solutions like asterisk which by virtue of being open, are more flexible****<br />
By allowing interoperability more units of both cisco and msft products will be sold. This does not mean that cisco and msft will not compete with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe shmoe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe shmoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Comeon Om, both the CEOs I think were fairly explicit that they &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; compete just as aggressively as before -- Steve saying Cisco will be a respectable competitor and Chambers making an equivalent, if not more aggressive, remark -- then why do you have to spin it out this way? Sensationalism?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes each of them has a right to trumpet their product to the extent of demeaning and downplaying the other brutally, but tell the world when they make it &lt;em&gt;incompatible-ly&lt;/em&gt; so. If you go read their PRs, their stmts, they were explicit that they are coming together only because enterprise customers wanted them to work together. Sheesh!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sad to see you bank on sensationalist (untrue) blogs! Tsk Tsk Tsk!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comeon Om, both the CEOs I think were fairly explicit that they <em>will</em> compete just as aggressively as before &#8212; Steve saying Cisco will be a respectable competitor and Chambers making an equivalent, if not more aggressive, remark &#8212; then why do you have to spin it out this way? Sensationalism?</p>
<p>Yes each of them has a right to trumpet their product to the extent of demeaning and downplaying the other brutally, but tell the world when they make it <em>incompatible-ly</em> so. If you go read their PRs, their stmts, they were explicit that they are coming together only because enterprise customers wanted them to work together. Sheesh!</p>
<p>Sad to see you bank on sensationalist (untrue) blogs! Tsk Tsk Tsk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Well put, though i hear there is a press conference tomorrow jointly hosted by Sun and Microsoft - another peace accord.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put, though i hear there is a press conference tomorrow jointly hosted by Sun and Microsoft &#8211; another peace accord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoSpark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GeoSpark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/09/11/cisco-vs-microsoft-round-two/#comment-180143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;How is this surprising to anyone?  Since when has Microsoft ever played nice with anyone?  You don&#039;t get a monopoly on desktops into perpetuity by playing nice.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this surprising to anyone?  Since when has Microsoft ever played nice with anyone?  You don&#8217;t get a monopoly on desktops into perpetuity by playing nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

