<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Americans To Have Mobile Phones by 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Manju</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-788443</link>
		<dc:creator>Manju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-788443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is really impressive figures.Still India have to go much more.In India total teledensity is below 30% .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really impressive figures.Still India have to go much more.In India total teledensity is below 30% .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study suggests 100% mobile phone penetration in the US by 2013 at RazorSharp iPods &#38; Raw Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-491540</link>
		<dc:creator>Study suggests 100% mobile phone penetration in the US by 2013 at RazorSharp iPods &#38; Raw Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-491540</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Read&#160;&#124;&#160;Permalink&#160;&#124;&#160;Email this&#160;&#124;&#160;Linking&#160;Blogs&#160;&#124;&#160;Comments [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recent Research: August 2007</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-483895</link>
		<dc:creator>The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recent Research: August 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-483895</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] US mobile penetration to hit 100% in 2013 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] US mobile penetration to hit 100% in 2013 [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-480232</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-480232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am glad that mobile continues to grow. The mobile phone is becoming a wallet and a great way for people to help each other and increase the success of cause type campaigns. We definately see that in all our clients here at MobileCause.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Connect. And Change the World!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sean 
mobilecause.com a mobile social enabler&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that mobile continues to grow. The mobile phone is becoming a wallet and a great way for people to help each other and increase the success of cause type campaigns. We definately see that in all our clients here at MobileCause.</p>

<p>Connect. And Change the World!</p>

<p>Sean 
mobilecause.com a mobile social enabler</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: びっくり</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-478162</link>
		<dc:creator>びっくり</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-478162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why do we base our technical decisions on what some comedian named Kagan on Saturday Night Live says? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we base our technical decisions on what some comedian named Kagan on Saturday Night Live says? ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-477509</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-477509</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, by 2013 it will be illegal not to have a mobile phone. Already in Boston there is a crime against conformity called DWC: driving without cellphone. But there are few offenders.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, by 2013 it will be illegal not to have a mobile phone. Already in Boston there is a crime against conformity called DWC: driving without cellphone. But there are few offenders.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iLibrarian &#187; Why Mobile Matters</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-477088</link>
		<dc:creator>iLibrarian &#187; Why Mobile Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-477088</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] a US perspective, check out yesterday&#8217;s GigaOM post All Americans To Have Mobile Phones by 2013. Om Malik reports on research by SNL Kagan that shows that nearly 84% of the US population will [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a US perspective, check out yesterday&#8217;s GigaOM post All Americans To Have Mobile Phones by 2013. Om Malik reports on research by SNL Kagan that shows that nearly 84% of the US population will [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-476953</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-476953</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Data is not at 17% today in the US.  Non-voice might be 17%, but that includes P2P SMS, which does not flow over the data channel and is not a &quot;data service&quot; in any meaningful sense of the word.  The EU operators pushed this conflation when they were getting beat up in the markets for overpaying for spectrum early in the decade.  &quot;Hey, let&#039;s call all that cheesy old SMS traffic &#039;data&#039; and then we can claim ROI on those fancy new networks that we&#039;re building out...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data is not at 17% today in the US.  Non-voice might be 17%, but that includes P2P SMS, which does not flow over the data channel and is not a &#8220;data service&#8221; in any meaningful sense of the word.  The EU operators pushed this conflation when they were getting beat up in the markets for overpaying for spectrum early in the decade.  &#8220;Hey, let&#8217;s call all that cheesy old SMS traffic &#8216;data&#8217; and then we can claim ROI on those fancy new networks that we&#8217;re building out&#8230;&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yogesh Kaushik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-476269</link>
		<dc:creator>Yogesh Kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-476269</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think Mobility is hardly a competitive market and it&#039;s not likely to change very soon. If it was so, iPhone would not create the mania it did. Mobile voice, on the other hand, is a commodity and the ARPU growth would definitely not come from voice. The growth opportunities in the mobile ecosystem are video, data, m-commerce, advertising, converged devices, localisation and personalisation to name a few off the top of my head. How much of this value is captured by the MNO is a different question.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mobility is hardly a competitive market and it&#8217;s not likely to change very soon. If it was so, iPhone would not create the mania it did. Mobile voice, on the other hand, is a commodity and the ARPU growth would definitely not come from voice. The growth opportunities in the mobile ecosystem are video, data, m-commerce, advertising, converged devices, localisation and personalisation to name a few off the top of my head. How much of this value is captured by the MNO is a different question.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raindeer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-476016</link>
		<dc:creator>Raindeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-476016</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting that they expect ARPU to grow. Wouldn&#039;t it be logical that in a &lt;em&gt;competitive&lt;/em&gt; market ARPU would drop? The marginal costs of adding extra customers is close to zero. Same goes for offering the customers more bits/minutes/services or better quality for the same price. Economic theory would therefore predict there would be pressure on margins.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On top of this, there is a significant divide in the US between the haves and the broke poor. The bottom of the market is interesting, but for them prices do need to come down&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that they expect ARPU to grow. Wouldn&#8217;t it be logical that in a <em>competitive</em> market ARPU would drop? The marginal costs of adding extra customers is close to zero. Same goes for offering the customers more bits/minutes/services or better quality for the same price. Economic theory would therefore predict there would be pressure on margins.</p>

<p>On top of this, there is a significant divide in the US between the haves and the broke poor. The bottom of the market is interesting, but for them prices do need to come down</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-475811</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-475811</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Data growth will be the future - b/c it will be the only revenue. Soon we will be using VoIP on our cells and the source of revenue for carriers will be data plans (and devices/peripherals).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data growth will be the future &#8211; b/c it will be the only revenue. Soon we will be using VoIP on our cells and the source of revenue for carriers will be data plans (and devices/peripherals).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474921</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474921</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Kevin&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good point. Of course mobile companies are counting on subscribers like me who are stuck with iPhone and need blackberry to really get email on the go. Anyway i think the point about younger people is a valid one, though in the aging population, i think it might not be the case, given the healthcare needs etc. my two cents.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin</p>

<p>Good point. Of course mobile companies are counting on subscribers like me who are stuck with iPhone and need blackberry to really get email on the go. Anyway i think the point about younger people is a valid one, though in the aging population, i think it might not be the case, given the healthcare needs etc. my two cents.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Walsh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474904</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474904</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’ll add this to my collection of ridiculous prognostications that indicate we’re entering another tech bubble.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;17% of the US population is under 10 or over 80. And while a subset of those age groups do have cell phones, it’s small and will always be so (7% are under 5; I doubt even well-heeled toddlers in Palo Alto are sporting cell phones). For the Kagan estimate (“more than 100 percent”) to be true, a very, very large number of people would need to have two or more cell phones. And while having the latest gadget is mandatory for the digital elite, having two or more cell phones is a sign of insecurity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll add this to my collection of ridiculous prognostications that indicate we’re entering another tech bubble.</p>

<p>17% of the US population is under 10 or over 80. And while a subset of those age groups do have cell phones, it’s small and will always be so (7% are under 5; I doubt even well-heeled toddlers in Palo Alto are sporting cell phones). For the Kagan estimate (“more than 100 percent”) to be true, a very, very large number of people would need to have two or more cell phones. And while having the latest gadget is mandatory for the digital elite, having two or more cell phones is a sign of insecurity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I misread the title as &quot;All Americans &lt;em&gt;HAVE TO HAVE&lt;/em&gt; Mobile Phones by 2013&quot; like it was some kind of government mandate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was thinking of an &quot;improvement&quot; to the national ID card. Not only will you be forced to ID yourself and let them always know where you are (through RFID), but you must also be available for propaganda... er public service... calls.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I misread the title as &#8220;All Americans <em>HAVE TO HAVE</em> Mobile Phones by 2013&#8243; like it was some kind of government mandate.</p>

<p>I was thinking of an &#8220;improvement&#8221; to the national ID card. Not only will you be forced to ID yourself and let them always know where you are (through RFID), but you must also be available for propaganda&#8230; er public service&#8230; calls.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474849</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474849</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you can go past 100% - Sweden, Finland are perfect examples, because people have multiple phones/devices.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can go past 100% &#8211; Sweden, Finland are perfect examples, because people have multiple phones/devices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474848</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/23/all-americans-to-have-mobile-phones-by-2013/#comment-474848</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dave H, I don&#039;t have that information handy but have emailed the research firm to get that data.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave H, I don&#8217;t have that information handy but have emailed the research firm to get that data.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
