<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phone Number For Life? Not Quite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there are no more invites at Grandcentral.
Think they are going to abandon the whole idea?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are no more invites at Grandcentral.<br />
Think they are going to abandon the whole idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eesnews &#187; phone number for search results</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eesnews &#187; phone number for search results]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/ Phone Number For Life? Not Quite - GigaOM There is word that some GrandCentral users who had signed up for a phone number for life are finding out that it isn?t exactly the case, and are being told &#8230; [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/</a> Phone Number For Life? Not Quite &#8211; GigaOM There is word that some GrandCentral users who had signed up for a phone number for life are finding out that it isn?t exactly the case, and are being told &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trademark registration</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I will definitely check out this service, as it seems like a really good idea (one phone number, one voicemail).  And is it just me, or is Google developing a habit of preempting or just simply outperforming other pay services with their free apps? Not complaining, just wondering…&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;…oh and I’m giving it 5 years before Google unveils their private army and begins their final bid for total world domination.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will definitely check out this service, as it seems like a really good idea (one phone number, one voicemail).  And is it just me, or is Google developing a habit of preempting or just simply outperforming other pay services with their free apps? Not complaining, just wondering…</p>
<p>…oh and I’m giving it 5 years before Google unveils their private army and begins their final bid for total world domination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype Hangs Up On Some In London &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype Hangs Up On Some In London &#171; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] how we complained about Google-owned GrandCentral doing a switcheroo on their promise of one number for life. Well, Skype is doing the same to some Londoners who have SkypeIn Numbers. The company sent an [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how we complained about Google-owned GrandCentral doing a switcheroo on their promise of one number for life. Well, Skype is doing the same to some Londoners who have SkypeIn Numbers. The company sent an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I just lost my number recently (within the last week, todays date 10/19/07). So it&#039;s still happening and getting worse. I thought MS was evil; watch out for Google. LOOK - There - watch out, I warned you!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just lost my number recently (within the last week, todays date 10/19/07). So it&#8217;s still happening and getting worse. I thought MS was evil; watch out for Google. LOOK &#8211; There &#8211; watch out, I warned you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;i read alot of people griping about  num change    one word  BETA but i wish i could change my num cause i moved.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read alot of people griping about  num change    one word  BETA but i wish i could change my num cause i moved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseanddave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joseanddave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Agreed. If you&#039;re willing to risk your business on a beta application, you should be willing to take the downside of that risk.  GC / Google did an nice job picking up the tab.  But there are tons of other unified communications services out there that are business read.  Check out www.innoport.com or J2 communications.  These guys have been in the space a lot longer than GC and have services far beyond what GC offers.  And imagine it...thousands and thousands of business customers.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. If you&#8217;re willing to risk your business on a beta application, you should be willing to take the downside of that risk.  GC / Google did an nice job picking up the tab.  But there are tons of other unified communications services out there that are business read.  Check out <a href="http://www.innoport.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.innoport.com</a> or J2 communications.  These guys have been in the space a lot longer than GC and have services far beyond what GC offers.  And imagine it&#8230;thousands and thousands of business customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebtel Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; google and grand central reprint your business cards for free</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebtel Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; google and grand central reprint your business cards for free]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] GrandCentral&#8217;s product information, but this, apparently is not exactly the case, as Om writes.  Judi Sohn, who edits WebWorkerDaily and has been a long time fan of GrandCentral got an email [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GrandCentral&#8217;s product information, but this, apparently is not exactly the case, as Om writes.  Judi Sohn, who edits WebWorkerDaily and has been a long time fan of GrandCentral got an email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aswath Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lifetime Guarantee&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I first came to the country one of the first jokes I heard was about lifetime guarantee - yes it is guaranteed to wok for its lifetime. Om informs us that GrandCentral/Google have found reasons to change some of...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lifetime Guarantee</strong></p>
<p>When I first came to the country one of the first jokes I heard was about lifetime guarantee &#8211; yes it is guaranteed to wok for its lifetime. Om informs us that GrandCentral/Google have found reasons to change some of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechScoop &#187; TechScoop Episode One - August 24, 2007</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechScoop &#187; TechScoop Episode One - August 24, 2007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] GrandCentral Changes Users&#8217; Phone Numbers [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GrandCentral Changes Users&#8217; Phone Numbers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; GrandCentral switches 434 users&#8217; phone numbers.&#160;by&#160;GPhoneholic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#160; GrandCentral switches 434 users&#8217; phone numbers.&#160;by&#160;GPhoneholic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Via GigaOM. (I recommend reading GigaOM&#8217;s coverage. Also, I just added them to the GPhoneholic blogroll.) [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via GigaOM. (I recommend reading GigaOM&#8217;s coverage. Also, I just added them to the GPhoneholic blogroll.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrandCentral: un numero telefonico per tutta la vita? Non proprio&#8230; &#124; VoipBlog.it</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GrandCentral: un numero telefonico per tutta la vita? Non proprio&#8230; &#124; VoipBlog.it]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Link: gigaom.com [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: gigaom.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edtajchman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edtajchman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;HA! I looked it up &#039;web 2.0&#039; doesn&#039;t mean a darn thing, it&#039;s just a marketing term... still good article...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA! I looked it up &#8216;web 2.0&#8242; doesn&#8217;t mean a darn thing, it&#8217;s just a marketing term&#8230; still good article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmax@danamax.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmax@danamax.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I did not get a notice of my number changing, but for some reason, many features on GrandCentral have not been working this week (submitting notes, reducing the details screen, downloading, etc).  I&#039;ve tried contacting support, but I have not gotten ANY response.  I&#039;m a bit disappointed, because previously, I&#039;ve gotten GREAT customer service.  I wonder if things are falling apart with the service?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not get a notice of my number changing, but for some reason, many features on GrandCentral have not been working this week (submitting notes, reducing the details screen, downloading, etc).  I&#8217;ve tried contacting support, but I have not gotten ANY response.  I&#8217;m a bit disappointed, because previously, I&#8217;ve gotten GREAT customer service.  I wonder if things are falling apart with the service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Worker Daily &#187; Blog Archive Is Public Beta a Warning or Invitation? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Worker Daily &#187; Blog Archive Is Public Beta a Warning or Invitation? &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Public Beta a Warning or&#160;Invitation? As you may have read on GigaOM and elsewhere, new Google acquisition GrandCentral got themselves in a bit of a pickle this week. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Public Beta a Warning or&nbsp;Invitation? As you may have read on GigaOM and elsewhere, new Google acquisition GrandCentral got themselves in a bit of a pickle this week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VOIP Junkie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VOIP Junkie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/phone-number-for-life-not-quite/#comment-178199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;looks like the was XO that held that Troy&#039;s number referance above, looks like most of the grand central numbers are under Level 3 Communications&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like the was XO that held that Troy&#8217;s number referance above, looks like most of the grand central numbers are under Level 3 Communications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

