<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iWork vs Microsoft Office: The Great Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-894543</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-894543</guid>
		<description>If Apple were to add more features to  Numbers and make iWork PC compatible while retaining its lower price point, I think Microsoft Office would be in serious trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple were to add more features to  Numbers and make iWork PC compatible while retaining its lower price point, I think Microsoft Office would be in serious trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarang Tuli</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-871259</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarang Tuli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-871259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do you think Apple can further add more features into iWork in the next 2-3 years, to pose a serious threat to microsoft office for the enterprise segment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Apple can further add more features into iWork in the next 2-3 years, to pose a serious threat to microsoft office for the enterprise segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Griffith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-471844</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-471844</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I tried to learn Excel 2007 on my own from three different texts.  It was like translating the Code of Hammurabi.  This did not surprise me since it is a Microsoft product(Excel, not the Code).  From here on, I'm an Apple picker.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to learn Excel 2007 on my own from three different texts.  It was like translating the Code of Hammurabi.  This did not surprise me since it is a Microsoft product(Excel, not the Code).  From here on, I&#8217;m an Apple picker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Anderson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-463292</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-463292</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With Pages 08 one can easily switch modes between page layout and word processing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Pages 08 one can easily switch modes between page layout and word processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viswakarma</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-462237</link>
		<dc:creator>Viswakarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-462237</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been working with iWork '08 Trial, to understand the paradigm behind Numbers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Numbers has more to it than is obvious when one looks at it from a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet point of view. It is almost like a set of interlinked tables in Relational Database with all of the tables visible on a single canvas, at the same time. One of the more fascinating aspects of Numbers, when compared to Relational Database, is that each table is a mini-spreadsheet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once people understand the paradigm behind Numbers, they will find out that it is a "killer" application combining the paradigms of a spreadsheet and a relational database, in a use-friendly application development environment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been working with iWork &#8216;08 Trial, to understand the paradigm behind Numbers.</p>
<p>Numbers has more to it than is obvious when one looks at it from a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet point of view. It is almost like a set of interlinked tables in Relational Database with all of the tables visible on a single canvas, at the same time. One of the more fascinating aspects of Numbers, when compared to Relational Database, is that each table is a mini-spreadsheet.</p>
<p>Once people understand the paradigm behind Numbers, they will find out that it is a &#8220;killer&#8221; application combining the paradigms of a spreadsheet and a relational database, in a use-friendly application development environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-461047</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-461047</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You fanboys really should step outside your skin and read the crap you post. I mean seriously, I find it hard to believe you guys write this stuff without craking up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You fanboys really should step outside your skin and read the crap you post. I mean seriously, I find it hard to believe you guys write this stuff without craking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viswakarma</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-460618</link>
		<dc:creator>Viswakarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-460618</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Numbers paradigm of is that of a single canvas, where multiple tables (mini-spreadsheets) are located side by side, is much better than the Microsoft Excel paradigm where a spreadsheet page is a large table with multiple tables are tacked on top of each other.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Further, in Numbers each mini-spreadsheet can be assigned a different user-focussed function and format to make its function explicit, and tie these mini-spreadsheets together, to be more like the various tables in a relational database. Each template that comes with Numbers is essentially a pre-designed relational database.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Numbers paradigm of is that of a single canvas, where multiple tables (mini-spreadsheets) are located side by side, is much better than the Microsoft Excel paradigm where a spreadsheet page is a large table with multiple tables are tacked on top of each other.</p>
<p>Further, in Numbers each mini-spreadsheet can be assigned a different user-focussed function and format to make its function explicit, and tie these mini-spreadsheets together, to be more like the various tables in a relational database. Each template that comes with Numbers is essentially a pre-designed relational database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: startingtoday</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-459429</link>
		<dc:creator>startingtoday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-459429</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have a Mac, and ended up buying iWork. I also have MS Office on my Mac. I NEVER use Word. Pages is so much more intuitive and user friendly and visually pleasing. I always do work on Pages, and save it as Word or PDF if I'm going to send it. I don't need to do much with PowerPoint, but again, if I do? I use Keynote. I'll never go back.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Mac, and ended up buying iWork. I also have MS Office on my Mac. I NEVER use Word. Pages is so much more intuitive and user friendly and visually pleasing. I always do work on Pages, and save it as Word or PDF if I&#8217;m going to send it. I don&#8217;t need to do much with PowerPoint, but again, if I do? I use Keynote. I&#8217;ll never go back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Davis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457690</link>
		<dc:creator>John Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457690</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Word of today bears very little resemblance to its early versions. It used to be a great word processor. I used Word up to 5.1 and loved it. Then, after that it died and was resurrected as a Frankenapp. It doesn't seem to know what it is at the moment. It used to know. It used to be a simple word processor. Small, fast, enough functions for most purposes. The nearest thing to the old Word around now is TextEdit. For most word processing, TextEdit is quite sufficient. If I need more, I go to Pages. I only wish you could set keyboard shortcuts for various styles.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;John Davis&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Word of today bears very little resemblance to its early versions. It used to be a great word processor. I used Word up to 5.1 and loved it. Then, after that it died and was resurrected as a Frankenapp. It doesn&#8217;t seem to know what it is at the moment. It used to know. It used to be a simple word processor. Small, fast, enough functions for most purposes. The nearest thing to the old Word around now is TextEdit. For most word processing, TextEdit is quite sufficient. If I need more, I go to Pages. I only wish you could set keyboard shortcuts for various styles.</p>
<p>John Davis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Taylor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457548</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457548</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I write novels. I switched from Word to Pages with version 2, and version 3 fixes most of the problems I had with the program. Word displays text inaccurately, or at least in a way that, after hours looking at a screen, causes my eyes to hurt. Pages looks typeset, hence is easier on the eyes. I find that at least for fiction writing, Pages is better than Word. I don't plan to upgrad Word when it comes available.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write novels. I switched from Word to Pages with version 2, and version 3 fixes most of the problems I had with the program. Word displays text inaccurately, or at least in a way that, after hours looking at a screen, causes my eyes to hurt. Pages looks typeset, hence is easier on the eyes. I find that at least for fiction writing, Pages is better than Word. I don&#8217;t plan to upgrad Word when it comes available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Steinbaugh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Steinbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Keynote is a fantastic app and reason enough to buy the iWork suite.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keynote is a fantastic app and reason enough to buy the iWork suite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Johnston</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457157</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You bought it? You should have just downloaded the free (fully functional) demo on Apple's site.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bought it? You should have just downloaded the free (fully functional) demo on Apple&#8217;s site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457026</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457026</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pages is UB and Word isn't. That would explain the slowness issue right there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pages is UB and Word isn&#8217;t. That would explain the slowness issue right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Rafique</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457019</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran Rafique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-457019</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;iWork is great for presentations and documents. Numbers is on the weak side, it's more useful to plan a trip, budget small expenses, and create simple spreadsheets. Keynote is by far the best application in the iWork suite. It is fast, intuitive, and amazing templates. Pages is nothing spectacular but an improvement from Word.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Spend the extra cash if you need kick ass presentations, other than that Office is great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iWork is great for presentations and documents. Numbers is on the weak side, it&#8217;s more useful to plan a trip, budget small expenses, and create simple spreadsheets. Keynote is by far the best application in the iWork suite. It is fast, intuitive, and amazing templates. Pages is nothing spectacular but an improvement from Word.</p>
<p>Spend the extra cash if you need kick ass presentations, other than that Office is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccodez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-456975</link>
		<dc:creator>jccodez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-456975</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;om, I see you have not worked around engineers. They live and die by excel, for better or worse. In fact, the very nature of your mac fanboyness is quite disturbing. Yes, and your slamming skype...you sound like the national enquirer of tech, except valleywag does a much better job. So what are you getting "right" in the reporting realm these days?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>om, I see you have not worked around engineers. They live and die by excel, for better or worse. In fact, the very nature of your mac fanboyness is quite disturbing. Yes, and your slamming skype&#8230;you sound like the national enquirer of tech, except valleywag does a much better job. So what are you getting &#8220;right&#8221; in the reporting realm these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-456914</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/17/iwork-08-vs-microsoft-office/#comment-456914</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The real issue here isn't iWork or Microsoft Office...its that you are using a Mac. Bleck. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real issue here isn&#8217;t iWork or Microsoft Office&#8230;its that you are using a Mac. Bleck. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
