<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M2Z Networks Sticks It To The Martin Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC To Rule on Nationwide Porn-Free Wireless Web - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FCC To Rule on Nationwide Porn-Free Wireless Web - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and a carrier would sell access to the faster tier for all comers. The rule making was similar to a proposal created by the Kleiner-backed startup M2Z Networks, which had asked the FCC to give it the spectrum for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and a carrier would sell access to the faster tier for all comers. The rule making was similar to a proposal created by the Kleiner-backed startup M2Z Networks, which had asked the FCC to give it the spectrum for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why There Won&#8217;t Be Broadband Competition Anytime Soon - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why There Won&#8217;t Be Broadband Competition Anytime Soon - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Spectrum: A Kleiner-backed company called M2Z Networks has asked the FCC for use of the spectrum in the 2155-2175 MHz band to create a wireless broadband service. M2Z offered the FCC 5 percent of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spectrum: A Kleiner-backed company called M2Z Networks has asked the FCC for use of the spectrum in the 2155-2175 MHz band to create a wireless broadband service. M2Z offered the FCC 5 percent of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M2Z Says it Aced FCC Interference Tests - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M2Z Says it Aced FCC Interference Tests - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] plans to use the AWS-3 band for its wireless broadband network, but spectrum holders in the AWS-1 band&#8211;notably T-Mobile&#8211; claimed such devices would [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plans to use the AWS-3 band for its wireless broadband network, but spectrum holders in the AWS-1 band&#8211;notably T-Mobile&#8211; claimed such devices would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carriers Looking to Block Free Wireless Broadband? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carriers Looking to Block Free Wireless Broadband? - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] want to pay for the spectrum. The FCC ignored their request, so M2Z turned around and sued. They have to be feeling a tad vindicated by Martin&#8217;s latest move for free [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] want to pay for the spectrum. The FCC ignored their request, so M2Z turned around and sued. They have to be feeling a tad vindicated by Martin&#8217;s latest move for free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;News happening now...24-Year Term for Californian in Terrorism Training Case&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stories this blog was used in... 24-Year Term for Californian in Terrorism Training Case&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>News happening now&#8230;24-Year Term for Californian in Terrorism Training Case</strong></p>
<p>Stories this blog was used in&#8230; 24-Year Term for Californian in Terrorism Training Case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WISPA &#187; M2Z&#8217;s Application at FCC gets support</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WISPA &#187; M2Z&#8217;s Application at FCC gets support]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] FCC petition by M2Z is 15 months old, it seems like the FCC Chairman is ignoring it. According to GigaOm, M2Z is taking the FCC to court to get its due process, the process detailed in Section 7 of the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FCC petition by M2Z is 15 months old, it seems like the FCC Chairman is ignoring it. According to GigaOm, M2Z is taking the FCC to court to get its due process, the process detailed in Section 7 of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Bell Dogma: August 2007</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Bell Dogma: August 2007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] &#8220;Death by inaction&#8221; [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Death by inaction&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d rather see the FCC go Japanese on this one and make the spectrum unlicensed with a tariff on devices. Make the tariff progressive based on output power and you&#039;ve got compelling spectrum to support rural community wireless broadband. Too bad onbody asked me ;^)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather see the FCC go Japanese on this one and make the spectrum unlicensed with a tariff on devices. Make the tariff progressive based on output power and you&#8217;ve got compelling spectrum to support rural community wireless broadband. Too bad onbody asked me ;^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Policy Summit blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Policy Summit blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/15/m2z-vs-fcc/#comment-177855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;M2Z Seeks Court Help with FCC Decision&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s been less than three weeks since the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced its rules for the upcoming 700 MHz auction, a subject of much debate as various players vie for the coveted spectrum. Now, as GigaOm reports, there&#039;s another&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>M2Z Seeks Court Help with FCC Decision</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s been less than three weeks since the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced its rules for the upcoming 700 MHz auction, a subject of much debate as various players vie for the coveted spectrum. Now, as GigaOm reports, there&#8217;s another</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

