<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Classic Really, Seriously, Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Roberts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that &quot;Is Classic Dead&quot; is the right question. Its been a long time coming, a very slow journey, but really, you should ask &quot;Is the Macintosh dead?&quot; With Intel chips, a completely different interface, a Unix operating system, and no more Os9, the only similarity with Macs of ten years ago is the Edit menu, cut, copy, paste and clear. I haven&#039;t just bought an Apple Macintosh, I&#039;ve bought an Apple 6, what name should it have?

[Apple I, Apple II, Apple III, Apple Lisa, Apple Macintosh]

Still running my B&amp;W G3 tower though, built like a battleship, it will never break down. Too much legacy software that works perfectly and never crashes, plus I hate today&#039;s bloatware.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;Is Classic Dead&#8221; is the right question. Its been a long time coming, a very slow journey, but really, you should ask &#8220;Is the Macintosh dead?&#8221; With Intel chips, a completely different interface, a Unix operating system, and no more Os9, the only similarity with Macs of ten years ago is the Edit menu, cut, copy, paste and clear. I haven&#8217;t just bought an Apple Macintosh, I&#8217;ve bought an Apple 6, what name should it have?</p>
<p>[Apple I, Apple II, Apple III, Apple Lisa, Apple Macintosh]</p>
<p>Still running my B&amp;W G3 tower though, built like a battleship, it will never break down. Too much legacy software that works perfectly and never crashes, plus I hate today&#8217;s bloatware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackJackBonny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BlackJackBonny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve upgraded my G4 iMac this week to 10.4.10 (PPC) so that I can use any software available today.  I use the Classic environment for (1) old games that I still love to play (2) old applications that work faster or more stable in Classic than their OSX counterparts (3) because I have been working on a Mac of some description for 20 years (since the MacPlus) and I want to be able to access any document that I have created in that time.

I use a range of game emulators (PCSX, MAME, SMS Plus, Genesis Plus, Power64, etc.) so that I can play any arcade or console game I remember.  I use Mac OS emulators (vMac, BasiliskII, SheepShaver) to run systems from 9.0.4 down to 6.0.4 so that I can open legacy programs that will not run in later systems.
NOTE: SheepShaver is difficult to configure, slower and less stable than Classic - but it will work on both PPC and Intel.

I bang my head every month or two when I can&#039;t open my old PC work disks because of the Joliet CD format (I can use an applescript hack, but unstable), and I&#039;m yet to find a solution to opening password protected WinZip files.

My point - I want access to my own intellectual property and it is very frustrating when I can&#039;t open/refer to/reuse something that I created in the past.  It&#039;s like mourning a lost treasure.

And if you haven&#039;t experienced this yet, you haven&#039;t lived long or done enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve upgraded my G4 iMac this week to 10.4.10 (PPC) so that I can use any software available today.  I use the Classic environment for (1) old games that I still love to play (2) old applications that work faster or more stable in Classic than their OSX counterparts (3) because I have been working on a Mac of some description for 20 years (since the MacPlus) and I want to be able to access any document that I have created in that time.</p>
<p>I use a range of game emulators (PCSX, MAME, SMS Plus, Genesis Plus, Power64, etc.) so that I can play any arcade or console game I remember.  I use Mac OS emulators (vMac, BasiliskII, SheepShaver) to run systems from 9.0.4 down to 6.0.4 so that I can open legacy programs that will not run in later systems.<br />
NOTE: SheepShaver is difficult to configure, slower and less stable than Classic &#8211; but it will work on both PPC and Intel.</p>
<p>I bang my head every month or two when I can&#8217;t open my old PC work disks because of the Joliet CD format (I can use an applescript hack, but unstable), and I&#8217;m yet to find a solution to opening password protected WinZip files.</p>
<p>My point &#8211; I want access to my own intellectual property and it is very frustrating when I can&#8217;t open/refer to/reuse something that I created in the past.  It&#8217;s like mourning a lost treasure.</p>
<p>And if you haven&#8217;t experienced this yet, you haven&#8217;t lived long or done enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardcore old time gamer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hardcore old time gamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two reasons:
(1) Master of Orion (original is way better than the sequels, I like to play it while listening to podcasts)
(2) Majesty

I&#039;m not abandoning Classic, even if my main machines all become intels, I&#039;ll still keep a classic box around.  Heck, I have an old windows/linux box whose only purpose in life is to play the original Command &amp; Conquer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two reasons:<br />
(1) Master of Orion (original is way better than the sequels, I like to play it while listening to podcasts)<br />
(2) Majesty</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not abandoning Classic, even if my main machines all become intels, I&#8217;ll still keep a classic box around.  Heck, I have an old windows/linux box whose only purpose in life is to play the original Command &amp; Conquer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordmike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I definetly hope that the old versions are dead and buried.  Why anyone want to use old systems is something I will never understand, unless you need a program on the old system which the maker never ported to the new system. Then and only then can I understand the usage of an older obsolete system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definetly hope that the old versions are dead and buried.  Why anyone want to use old systems is something I will never understand, unless you need a program on the old system which the maker never ported to the new system. Then and only then can I understand the usage of an older obsolete system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbjcal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sbjcal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One word - Hypercard!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word &#8211; Hypercard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom von Schwerdtner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom von Schwerdtner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 04:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HotBot was the jam back when Wired was still hip and cool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HotBot was the jam back when Wired was still hip and cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Gaba</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Gaba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still use Classic once in awhile for exactly two things:

1. When I do Search Engine Optimization, I still use an old SEO program called VSE BeFound. The developers (out of Germany) kept promising an OS X version, but never got around to it and eventually disbanded.

2. Once in awhile I like to play an old D&amp;D-style adventure game called Realmz. No OS X version was ever developed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still use Classic once in awhile for exactly two things:</p>
<p>1. When I do Search Engine Optimization, I still use an old SEO program called VSE BeFound. The developers (out of Germany) kept promising an OS X version, but never got around to it and eventually disbanded.</p>
<p>2. Once in awhile I like to play an old D&amp;D-style adventure game called Realmz. No OS X version was ever developed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Westbrook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still use Classic on our kids iMac.  There are still a bunch of Mac OS 9 games for younger kids.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still use Classic on our kids iMac.  There are still a bunch of Mac OS 9 games for younger kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy K</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I moved to all Intel machines (24&quot; iMac/MacBook) over the last year, but there is one app I still need OS 9 for - Mastering Tools. It&#039;s shareware and the author quit writing for Mac apparently. I have yet to find a replacement, so I bought a cheap 600Mhz Snow iMac for when I absolutely need it.

(I really wish I could find a reasonably easy-to-use audio mastering app for OS X)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I moved to all Intel machines (24&#8243; iMac/MacBook) over the last year, but there is one app I still need OS 9 for &#8211; Mastering Tools. It&#8217;s shareware and the author quit writing for Mac apparently. I have yet to find a replacement, so I bought a cheap 600Mhz Snow iMac for when I absolutely need it.</p>
<p>(I really wish I could find a reasonably easy-to-use audio mastering app for OS X)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecab</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joecab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/06/is-classic-really-seriously-dead/#comment-322553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(er DTP biz that is)

And I do wonder if there are still schools running those same OS 9 apps they were 5-10 years ago...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(er DTP biz that is)</p>
<p>And I do wonder if there are still schools running those same OS 9 apps they were 5-10 years ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
