<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint to leave SpectrumCo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CableCos Join The $3 Billion U.S. WiMAX Rescue Act - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-867445</link>
		<dc:creator>CableCos Join The $3 Billion U.S. WiMAX Rescue Act - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-867445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Aug. 2, 2007: Sprint bails on spectrum partnership with cable companies [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aug. 2, 2007: Sprint bails on spectrum partnership with cable companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-568738</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-568738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is incorrect, Mr. Kopelman.  The licenses that they won are B block AWS licenses.  Which are the larger BEA licenses.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is incorrect, Mr. Kopelman.  The licenses that they won are B block AWS licenses.  Which are the larger BEA licenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-424692</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 04:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-424692</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michele, it takes well over 400 license to get national coverage in that band. These licenses are CMA (RSA and MSA) like the old Cellular licenses.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele, it takes well over 400 license to get national coverage in that band. These licenses are CMA (RSA and MSA) like the old Cellular licenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele C.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-417104</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-417104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;137 licenses after bidding $2.37 billion... does that math bother anyone else?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>137 licenses after bidding $2.37 billion&#8230; does that math bother anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-409852</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/sprint-to-leave-spectrumco/#comment-409852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On the latest episode of TWiT, John C. Dvorak said he thinks Google and Sprint are going to team up together incase AT&#38;T tries to charge Google for access to their customers. I wonder if this is part of that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the latest episode of TWiT, John C. Dvorak said he thinks Google and Sprint are going to team up together incase AT&amp;T tries to charge Google for access to their customers. I wonder if this is part of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
