<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answers.com raises questions about Google&#8217;s power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wikia Search, Knol, an API for Wikipedia, and Decentralization</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-841426</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikia Search, Knol, an API for Wikipedia, and Decentralization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-841426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] caused many to raise questions about Google&#8217;s power, including usually calming folks like Om Malik. Google&#8217;s move sent a clear signal: you may have the information, but we have the gateway to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] caused many to raise questions about Google&#8217;s power, including usually calming folks like Om Malik. Google&#8217;s move sent a clear signal: you may have the information, but we have the gateway to [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackuB.name &#62; Blog &#62; Spock.com, nový hráč na poli vyhledávačů?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-438587</link>
		<dc:creator>JackuB.name &#62; Blog &#62; Spock.com, nový hráč na poli vyhledávačů?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-438587</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] přišel odnikud a smetl Yahoo. Nyní má Google velkou moc. Může být i zlý. Proč by se ale to samé nemohlo stát i [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] přišel odnikud a smetl Yahoo. Nyní má Google velkou moc. Může být i zlý. Proč by se ale to samé nemohlo stát i [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yikes, I&#8217;ve angered the Google gods - Justinsomnia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-434121</link>
		<dc:creator>Yikes, I&#8217;ve angered the Google gods - Justinsomnia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-434121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] felt vulnerable as a result of my dependence on Google for retrieving my own information. I&#8217;m no Answers.com, but I&#8217;m no splog either.    Trackback  Wednesday, August 8, 2007 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] felt vulnerable as a result of my dependence on Google for retrieving my own information. I&#8217;m no Answers.com, but I&#8217;m no splog either.    Trackback  Wednesday, August 8, 2007 [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Linden</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-426455</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-426455</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Findory had a similar problem about a year ago, losing about 1/4 of its traffic mostly because of a change in Google&#039;s ranking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is not entirely clear, but what may have happened is that Findory was no longer considered the authoritative source for the news and blog excerpts shown on the site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As bad as it was for Findory, it is hard to complain about that. The original news source or blog should be considered the authoritative source.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suspect something similar might have happened to Answers.com.  Answers.com often has mostly content from Wikipedia for its page.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps Google now considers Wikipedia, the original source, to be the authoritative source and is sending traffic that used to go to Answers.com directly to Wikipedia.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Findory had a similar problem about a year ago, losing about 1/4 of its traffic mostly because of a change in Google&#8217;s ranking.</p>

<p>It is not entirely clear, but what may have happened is that Findory was no longer considered the authoritative source for the news and blog excerpts shown on the site.</p>

<p>As bad as it was for Findory, it is hard to complain about that. The original news source or blog should be considered the authoritative source.</p>

<p>I suspect something similar might have happened to Answers.com.  Answers.com often has mostly content from Wikipedia for its page.</p>

<p>Perhaps Google now considers Wikipedia, the original source, to be the authoritative source and is sending traffic that used to go to Answers.com directly to Wikipedia.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-417721</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-417721</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not a big fan of Answers.Com, so I&#039;m not disappointed that Google has revised their algorithm to place answers results lower.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of Answers.Com, so I&#8217;m not disappointed that Google has revised their algorithm to place answers results lower.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Connect &#124; Outside Connect II: Saturday reading</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-414852</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Connect &#124; Outside Connect II: Saturday reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-414852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] power over the search world has to be relooked at, says Om Malik. He cites the recent incidents at Answers.com to base his argument. Worth a read, I [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] power over the search world has to be relooked at, says Om Malik. He cites the recent incidents at Answers.com to base his argument. Worth a read, I [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-413018</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-413018</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google can do what ever they want. They are not a communist organization formed for the good of companies trying to serve more pages. They only have to answer to their stockholders and their users, both of which are pleased.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That being said, they do concentrate on making the webmasters happy as they have the best set of tools and reporting for webmasters, they are responsive and have a good open dialog on all the topics.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google can do what ever they want. They are not a communist organization formed for the good of companies trying to serve more pages. They only have to answer to their stockholders and their users, both of which are pleased.</p>

<p>That being said, they do concentrate on making the webmasters happy as they have the best set of tools and reporting for webmasters, they are responsive and have a good open dialog on all the topics.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Billian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-412563</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Billian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-412563</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Disclaimer: I like Google. I still think they provide the best results out there. I am just putting on the hat of a skeptic..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the questions here are:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;How does Google decide to rank one company higher &amp; another company not? (yes, links are one factor; but what do you do when you know SEO folks are attempting to game the system?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does Google give companies the right to contest how their results are showing? I believe that the answer is, &quot;No.&quot; If I fall from 1st to 30th in the results, would I have the ability to at least question the &quot;why&quot;? No.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Who&lt;/em&gt; at Google makes these decisions? A lot of people would probably be somewhat skeptical about it entirely being something tied to an algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;How&lt;/em&gt; is content quality rated? I would personally think that this is something that only a human being could do (which is why you have the del.icio.us/stumbleupon crowd). How would computers figure this out?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disclaimer: I like Google. I still think they provide the best results out there. I am just putting on the hat of a skeptic..</p>

<p>I think the questions here are:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>How does Google decide to rank one company higher &amp; another company not? (yes, links are one factor; but what do you do when you know SEO folks are attempting to game the system?).</p></li>
<li><p>Does Google give companies the right to contest how their results are showing? I believe that the answer is, &#8220;No.&#8221; If I fall from 1st to 30th in the results, would I have the ability to at least question the &#8220;why&#8221;? No.</p></li>
<li><p><em>Who</em> at Google makes these decisions? A lot of people would probably be somewhat skeptical about it entirely being something tied to an algorithm.</p></li>
<li><p><em>How</em> is content quality rated? I would personally think that this is something that only a human being could do (which is why you have the del.icio.us/stumbleupon crowd). How would computers figure this out?</p></li>
</ol>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Kalviainen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-412553</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Kalviainen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-412553</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The math doesn&#039;t seem to add up. If a Google algo change results in a 28% drop in total traffic, it doesn&#039;t make sense that 70% of their traffic is direct, unless they lost all of their Google traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The math doesn&#8217;t seem to add up. If a Google algo change results in a 28% drop in total traffic, it doesn&#8217;t make sense that 70% of their traffic is direct, unless they lost all of their Google traffic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-412060</link>
		<dc:creator>stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-412060</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Answers.com is barely a real company and the algo changes at Google effect nearly any/all companies that have lots of pages. it&#039;s part of the game.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answers.com is barely a real company and the algo changes at Google effect nearly any/all companies that have lots of pages. it&#8217;s part of the game.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-411858</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-411858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the 70% stat refers to traffic heading to all Answers Corp sites including Dictionary.com (which they are in the process of acquiring).  The Answers.com domain itself still gets a very large portion of its traffic from search.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>

<p>I think the 70% stat refers to traffic heading to all Answers Corp sites including Dictionary.com (which they are in the process of acquiring).  The Answers.com domain itself still gets a very large portion of its traffic from search.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410820</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No. I believe that less than 5% of internet users use feeds.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. I believe that less than 5% of internet users use feeds.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chetan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410810</link>
		<dc:creator>Chetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought most bloggers had their readers on feed rather than search engine.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought most bloggers had their readers on feed rather than search engine.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410259</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From Live.com, very little, but spaces.live.com is pretty good. we are seeing new referrals which means they are beginning to gain some traction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Live.com, very little, but spaces.live.com is pretty good. we are seeing new referrals which means they are beginning to gain some traction.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeShmoe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410228</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeShmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om, it&#039;d be interesting to know if you are seeing any bump, even if a teeny bit non-negligible one, in the traffic you get from LIVE?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, it&#8217;d be interesting to know if you are seeing any bump, even if a teeny bit non-negligible one, in the traffic you get from LIVE?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410122</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/08/02/answerscom-raises-questions-about-googles-power/#comment-410122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think you have anything to worry about Om, you have great content. Google is trying to deliver the best content out there and answers.com certainly isn&#039;t that.  Most of their articles, while informative, border on splog content; they are so heavily in filled with ads that you can barely decipher what&#039;s content.  If anything they deserve this demotion in rankings.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you have anything to worry about Om, you have great content. Google is trying to deliver the best content out there and answers.com certainly isn&#8217;t that.  Most of their articles, while informative, border on splog content; they are so heavily in filled with ads that you can barely decipher what&#8217;s content.  If anything they deserve this demotion in rankings.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
