<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Cisco kill the Linksys brand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: POLL: Should Cisco Kill Linksys Brand? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-871398</link>
		<dc:creator>POLL: Should Cisco Kill Linksys Brand? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-871398</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] year, Cisco CEO John Chambers ruffled some feathers when he made similar kill-Linksys noises. (See YouTube Video) The idea is to simplify the product [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year, Cisco CEO John Chambers ruffled some feathers when he made similar kill-Linksys noises. (See YouTube Video) The idea is to simplify the product [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on Linksys Rebranding &#124; coryandrews.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-854721</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Linksys Rebranding &#124; coryandrews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-854721</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] CEO John Chambers recently alluded to a planned rebranding of their consumer division Linksys, with Linksys products assuming the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CEO John Chambers recently alluded to a planned rebranding of their consumer division Linksys, with Linksys products assuming the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-613523</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-613523</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco should keep the Linksys brand. People are already knowing cisco for enterprise and Linksys for SOHOs.
Also, I can't understand why some people say Linksys is shit and should be phased-out. Remember that besides the Linksys logo there is a cisco logo on every Linksys producet. cisco won't ever put its logo on a crappy product.
If cisco phases-out the Linksys brand they would most probable kill a series of products and overcharge for the others.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco should keep the Linksys brand. People are already knowing cisco for enterprise and Linksys for SOHOs.<br />
Also, I can&#8217;t understand why some people say Linksys is shit and should be phased-out. Remember that besides the Linksys logo there is a cisco logo on every Linksys producet. cisco won&#8217;t ever put its logo on a crappy product.<br />
If cisco phases-out the Linksys brand they would most probable kill a series of products and overcharge for the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-427517</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-427517</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;keep the brand or merge brand are only 2 solutions.  A new brand, new consumer line would solve some problems, if coupled with real engineering design changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Branding in itself, does nothing to product quality, functionality or address design deficiencies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CSCO has (stockwise) growth problems. rather than divest their emerging BUs and build new companies that can scale stockwise, and bringing real shareholder value.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;JC insists in an everything CSCO strategy.
integrating all products under the CSCO moniker.  Many acquisitions have been stultified or underperformed after 'borg-like' integration&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;try something new John.a new brand, for consumers that has a CSCO like quality perception.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in terms of interoperability.. we've got a long way to go.. make Telepresence, VoIP, SA, wireless all play seamlessly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep the brand or merge brand are only 2 solutions.  A new brand, new consumer line would solve some problems, if coupled with real engineering design changes.</p>
<p>Branding in itself, does nothing to product quality, functionality or address design deficiencies.</p>
<p>CSCO has (stockwise) growth problems. rather than divest their emerging BUs and build new companies that can scale stockwise, and bringing real shareholder value.</p>
<p>JC insists in an everything CSCO strategy.<br />
integrating all products under the CSCO moniker.  Many acquisitions have been stultified or underperformed after &#8216;borg-like&#8217; integration</p>
<p>try something new John.a new brand, for consumers that has a CSCO like quality perception.</p>
<p>in terms of interoperability.. we&#8217;ve got a long way to go.. make Telepresence, VoIP, SA, wireless all play seamlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gadgets Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-423620</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gadgets Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-423620</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is Cisco Killing The Linksys Brand?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There have been some conflicting messages about whether or not networking giant Cisco, whom purchased Linksys in 2003, was going to kill the Linksys brand name. John Chambers recently reiterated his desire to phase-out the Linksys brand name, whereas C...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Cisco Killing The Linksys Brand?</strong></p>
<p>There have been some conflicting messages about whether or not networking giant Cisco, whom purchased Linksys in 2003, was going to kill the Linksys brand name. John Chambers recently reiterated his desire to phase-out the Linksys brand name, whereas C&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizurke</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-422535</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizurke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-422535</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Though getting rid of the Linksys name wouldn't affect me as a buyer I think it would really mess things up for the average home consumer. When your average joe thinks of Cisco they think it's large and quite complicated, but when they think of Linksys they think of it as something more on their level.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though getting rid of the Linksys name wouldn&#8217;t affect me as a buyer I think it would really mess things up for the average home consumer. When your average joe thinks of Cisco they think it&#8217;s large and quite complicated, but when they think of Linksys they think of it as something more on their level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Cisco kill the Linksys brand? &#124; Technology Funda</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-413086</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Cisco kill the Linksys brand? &#124; Technology Funda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-413086</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] are some details from the post on GigaOM: Cisco Systems, apparently is facing a dilemma: whether to lose to the Linksys brand name or not? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are some details from the post on GigaOM: Cisco Systems, apparently is facing a dilemma: whether to lose to the Linksys brand name or not? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-408407</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-408407</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;kill it.  cisco needs one brand going forward for all personal/consumer devices, and they will most certainly expand in this realm, so take the hit now and move on...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kill it.  cisco needs one brand going forward for all personal/consumer devices, and they will most certainly expand in this realm, so take the hit now and move on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-407524</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-407524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They need to keep it. Cisco's website is already too corporate and techie speak as it is - it would scare consumer and SOHO's away.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to keep it. Cisco&#8217;s website is already too corporate and techie speak as it is - it would scare consumer and SOHO&#8217;s away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Cisco kill the Linksys brand?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-406926</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Cisco kill the Linksys brand?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-406926</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] are some details from the post on GigaOM: Cisco Systems, apparently is facing a dilemma: whether to lose to the Linksys brand name or not? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are some details from the post on GigaOM: Cisco Systems, apparently is facing a dilemma: whether to lose to the Linksys brand name or not? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vaillancourt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-406117</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vaillancourt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-406117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I strongly agree with Czaries (1st comment) on this.  I would never consider Cisco because they are deemed expensive enterprise solution hardware.  Until Cisco becomes a consumer brand name I believe Linksys needs to stick around.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Plus from a conceptual standpoint, I have two brands to chose from Linksys or Cisco and not Cisco and some other brands.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly agree with Czaries (1st comment) on this.  I would never consider Cisco because they are deemed expensive enterprise solution hardware.  Until Cisco becomes a consumer brand name I believe Linksys needs to stick around.</p>
<p>Plus from a conceptual standpoint, I have two brands to chose from Linksys or Cisco and not Cisco and some other brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-405693</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-405693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;KILL IT.  LINKSYS PRODUCTS ARE TRASH... MOST OF THEIR CONSUMER ROUTERS SUPPORT 50-100 CONNECTIONS MAX BEFORE THEY CRASH, WHICH IS WAY TOO FEW NOW THAT EVERYONE IS RUNNING BITTORRENT.  WOULD MUCH PREFER CHEAP "INDUSTRIAL"-CONSUMER ROUTERS FROM CISCO THAT ATLEAST SUPPORT 300+ CONNECTIONS WITH EASE.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KILL IT.  LINKSYS PRODUCTS ARE TRASH&#8230; MOST OF THEIR CONSUMER ROUTERS SUPPORT 50-100 CONNECTIONS MAX BEFORE THEY CRASH, WHICH IS WAY TOO FEW NOW THAT EVERYONE IS RUNNING BITTORRENT.  WOULD MUCH PREFER CHEAP &#8220;INDUSTRIAL&#8221;-CONSUMER ROUTERS FROM CISCO THAT ATLEAST SUPPORT 300+ CONNECTIONS WITH EASE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Bernoff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-405602</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Bernoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-405602</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Philips faced this issue a while back -- Magnavox was the US brand, they wanted the band to be Philips globally.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Result: they started branding things Philips Magnavox to make the connection, then eventually dropped Magnavox on most products.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cisco Linksys routers make sense in this scenario. Then 2 years from now it's just Cisco.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philips faced this issue a while back &#8212; Magnavox was the US brand, they wanted the band to be Philips globally.</p>
<p>Result: they started branding things Philips Magnavox to make the connection, then eventually dropped Magnavox on most products.</p>
<p>Cisco Linksys routers make sense in this scenario. Then 2 years from now it&#8217;s just Cisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guruprasad V</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-405246</link>
		<dc:creator>Guruprasad V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-405246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Linksys has its own brand identity. Why spend half a billion dollar to kill a brand.Cisco - Corporate Customers. Linksys -Home Segment. We could clearly see the differentiation.Why not people at Cisco?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linksys has its own brand identity. Why spend half a billion dollar to kill a brand.Cisco - Corporate Customers. Linksys -Home Segment. We could clearly see the differentiation.Why not people at Cisco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tough interview questions</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-404001</link>
		<dc:creator>Tough interview questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-404001</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I feel that killing the 'Linksys' brandname will be a foolish thing to do.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that killing the &#8216;Linksys&#8217; brandname will be a foolish thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad Humeid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-403285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad Humeid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/should-cisco-kill-the-linksys-brand/#comment-403285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Linksys is a global brand. I would even say a respected global brand. I think the name should be kept but connected to Cisco, through corporate design or clearer cisco branding presence on linksys products and communication.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The current Linksys corporate design looks rather cheap. It needs an upgrade. Getting closer to the Cisco corporate design will serve it well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The question is: if Cisco decide and kill the linksys brand, what will they gain. Will they sell more routers and wireless hubs? Or is this more of an exercise in brand-as-empire.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Many home users, who, by now, are  aware of the Linksys brand, might not even know who Cisco is (or if they know it, it will be something 'corporate' and distant to them).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So.. Keep the Linksys brand, upgrade its look and communication (and innovate on the product design level) and connect it more to Cisco.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another suggestion: specialize the Linksys brand on a certain class(s) of products (like wireless solutions, for example) and move the rest of the Linksys prpducts (the more 'pro' ones) to Cisco.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linksys is a global brand. I would even say a respected global brand. I think the name should be kept but connected to Cisco, through corporate design or clearer cisco branding presence on linksys products and communication.</p>
<p>The current Linksys corporate design looks rather cheap. It needs an upgrade. Getting closer to the Cisco corporate design will serve it well.</p>
<p>The question is: if Cisco decide and kill the linksys brand, what will they gain. Will they sell more routers and wireless hubs? Or is this more of an exercise in brand-as-empire.</p>
<p>Many home users, who, by now, are  aware of the Linksys brand, might not even know who Cisco is (or if they know it, it will be something &#8216;corporate&#8217; and distant to them).</p>
<p>So.. Keep the Linksys brand, upgrade its look and communication (and innovate on the product design level) and connect it more to Cisco.</p>
<p>Another suggestion: specialize the Linksys brand on a certain class(s) of products (like wireless solutions, for example) and move the rest of the Linksys prpducts (the more &#8216;pro&#8217; ones) to Cisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
