<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Gives Google Half a Win</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 8 Things to Know About the 700MHz Auction - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-857953</link>
		<dc:creator>8 Things to Know About the 700MHz Auction - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-857953</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Setting the rules for this auction took a lot of time &#8212; and lobbying. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Setting the rules for this auction took a lot of time &#8212; and lobbying. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Glaskowsky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-482313</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Glaskowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-482313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I covered a Reed Hundt speech last week on my CNET blog. It sounds like Frontline is still interested in participating, and that they may still be hoping for further rules changes. Hundt appeared to be agitating for political intervention.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13512_1-9763664-23.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;.                   png&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I covered a Reed Hundt speech last week on my CNET blog. It sounds like Frontline is still interested in participating, and that they may still be hoping for further rules changes. Hundt appeared to be agitating for political intervention.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13512_1-9763664-23.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>.                   png</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Schmidt: Google will &#8216;Probably&#8217; Bid on Spectrum &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-469394</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM Schmidt: Google will &#8216;Probably&#8217; Bid on Spectrum &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-469394</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Google CEO Eric Schmidt says the search giant will &#8220;probably&#8221; bid in the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum auctions, telling an audience here Tuesday that Google &#8220;got the spirit of what we were asking&#8221; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google CEO Eric Schmidt says the search giant will &#8220;probably&#8221; bid in the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum auctions, telling an audience here Tuesday that Google &#8220;got the spirit of what we were asking&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007-08-02 / mblogg.se</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-408987</link>
		<dc:creator>2007-08-02 / mblogg.se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-408987</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] FCC Gives Google Half a Win [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FCC Gives Google Half a Win [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-407510</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-407510</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like a good start to me. I have to somewhat agree with AT&#38;T's sentiments. While I want Google to win, stacking the deck entirely in Google's favor makes it difficult for the traditional telcos and thus decreases competition.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a good start to me. I have to somewhat agree with AT&amp;T&#8217;s sentiments. While I want Google to win, stacking the deck entirely in Google&#8217;s favor makes it difficult for the traditional telcos and thus decreases competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM FCC 700 MHz Decision: Just Not Good Enough &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-407240</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM FCC 700 MHz Decision: Just Not Good Enough &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-407240</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] by Om Malik  Wednesday, August 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM PT &#124; No comments   So much has been written about the 700 MHz wireless auctions, and there has been a lot rejoicing on part of Google and other consumer groups who oppose the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Om Malik  Wednesday, August 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM PT | No comments   So much has been written about the 700 MHz wireless auctions, and there has been a lot rejoicing on part of Google and other consumer groups who oppose the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Policy Summit blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-406582</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Policy Summit blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-406582</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Day After: Reactions to FCC Auction Rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, there's been a mixed reaction to yesterday's Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision on the 700 MHz auction rules. For those of you who managed, somehow, to escape the news, the Commission voted 4-1 in favor of requiring part&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Day After: Reactions to FCC Auction Rules</strong></p>
<p>Not surprisingly, there&#8217;s been a mixed reaction to yesterday&#8217;s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision on the 700 MHz auction rules. For those of you who managed, somehow, to escape the news, the Commission voted 4-1 in favor of requiring part</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Removing All Doubt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-406512</link>
		<dc:creator>Removing All Doubt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-406512</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google and Rock, Paper, Scissors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, some people think Google is bluffing, and have no intention of entering the auction. I doubt that, although to disclose how much they are willing to bid is certainly an odd move. Its most likely a bit of game theory. If I'm playing rock, paper,...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google and Rock, Paper, Scissors</strong></p>
<p>Well, some people think Google is bluffing, and have no intention of entering the auction. I doubt that, although to disclose how much they are willing to bid is certainly an odd move. Its most likely a bit of game theory. If I&#8217;m playing rock, paper,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-405799</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-405799</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so sick of AT&#38;T throwing out this canard that Google was trying to get the FCC to stack the deck in their favor. Were they? Probably. But AT&#38;T and Verizon aren't in any position to criticize Google for that. They wouldn't exist but for years and years and years of stacking the regulatory deck. Ask a CLEC about how the telcos played the regulatory game after 1996. Oh wait, you can't, since the telcos gamed most of them out of business through artificial regulatory hurdles.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so sick of AT&amp;T throwing out this canard that Google was trying to get the FCC to stack the deck in their favor. Were they? Probably. But AT&amp;T and Verizon aren&#8217;t in any position to criticize Google for that. They wouldn&#8217;t exist but for years and years and years of stacking the regulatory deck. Ask a CLEC about how the telcos played the regulatory game after 1996. Oh wait, you can&#8217;t, since the telcos gamed most of them out of business through artificial regulatory hurdles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404273</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404273</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope this won't be considered SPAM.  I have written an analysis of this announcement and would welcome Om's input.  In summary:
the new 700 MHz networks will be GSM.
Vodafone will bid hard.
The incumbents will soon be hating life.
The "no contract" operators will be short-term winners.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've been a fan from the "Om on Broadband" days an would welcome his thoughts.  Thank-you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.teletips.net/2007/07/31/google-scores-a-victory-for-consumers/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this won&#8217;t be considered SPAM.  I have written an analysis of this announcement and would welcome Om&#8217;s input.  In summary:<br />
the new 700 MHz networks will be GSM.<br />
Vodafone will bid hard.<br />
The incumbents will soon be hating life.<br />
The &#8220;no contract&#8221; operators will be short-term winners.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a fan from the &#8220;Om on Broadband&#8221; days an would welcome his thoughts.  Thank-you.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.teletips.net/2007/07/31/google-scores-a-victory-for-consumers/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Most Valuable Spectrum on Earth : Venture Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404215</link>
		<dc:creator>The Most Valuable Spectrum on Earth : Venture Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404215</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] broadcasters will partially be auctioned off next year and Google wants it. There is some great analysis of the rules and consequences elseware so I&#8217;ll spare my .02 cents. My primary thought on the matter is that if the CTIA is so [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] broadcasters will partially be auctioned off next year and Google wants it. There is some great analysis of the rules and consequences elseware so I&#8217;ll spare my .02 cents. My primary thought on the matter is that if the CTIA is so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Gives Google Half A Win &#171; winklestiltskin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404185</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Gives Google Half A Win &#171; winklestiltskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404185</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek Tiwari</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404078</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek Tiwari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-404078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rise of GoogNet &#8212; Part 3, Well Sort Of&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most of you know about the FCC auction of 700 MHZ spectrum. I covered it in a previous post. Google had thrown the gauntlet in the game and asked FCC to include following conditions in the auction rules:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Open Apps
Open Devices
Open Services
Open Netw...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rise of GoogNet &#8212; Part 3, Well Sort Of&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Most of you know about the FCC auction of 700 MHZ spectrum. I covered it in a previous post. Google had thrown the gauntlet in the game and asked FCC to include following conditions in the auction rules:</p>
<p>Open Apps<br />
Open Devices<br />
Open Services<br />
Open Netw&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-403722</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-403722</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;... like Google didn't know what they were doing!  Get real!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google probably created a special political algorithm to determine exactly how to play this whole thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; like Google didn&#8217;t know what they were doing!  Get real!</p>
<p>Google probably created a special political algorithm to determine exactly how to play this whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Wireless Auction: Google Wins, AT&#38;T Wins, Americans Lose &#171; Scholars and Rogues</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-403628</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Wireless Auction: Google Wins, AT&#38;T Wins, Americans Lose &#171; Scholars and Rogues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-403628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] many in the tech blogosphere, like TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington and GigaOm&#8217;s Paul Kapustka, see it as I do&#8230;that the FCC&#8217;s Republican-led majority had an opportunity to make [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many in the tech blogosphere, like TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington and GigaOm&#8217;s Paul Kapustka, see it as I do&#8230;that the FCC&#8217;s Republican-led majority had an opportunity to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnoso - Turning good ideas into great software</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-403511</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnoso - Turning good ideas into great software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/31/fcc-gives-google-half-a-win/#comment-403511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] that they&#8217;ve revised the rules for the upcoming 700MHz wireless spectrum auction.  Apparently, they&#8217;ve adopted the first two of Google&#8217;s four proposed openness rules for the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that they&#8217;ve revised the rules for the upcoming 700MHz wireless spectrum auction.  Apparently, they&#8217;ve adopted the first two of Google&#8217;s four proposed openness rules for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
