19 Comments

Summary:

Updated.Looks like the vote on the 700 MHz auction rulemaking is finally in, and as expected the commission adopted some of the open-networking proposals championed by Google, but not all. While Google carefully lauds the FCC for its action in a post on the company’s public […]

Updated.Looks like the vote on the 700 MHz auction rulemaking is finally in, and as expected the commission adopted some of the open-networking proposals championed by Google, but not all. While Google carefully lauds the FCC for its action in a post on the company’s public policy blog, both Google and other observers (like the analysts at Stifel, Nicolaus) are guessing that the fine print in the rules (they will likely be published in a couple weeks) will make it extremely hard for any new national provider to surface.

Official releases now are on the No info yet on the FCC site; the rules passed on a 4-1 vote, with commissioner Robert McDowell, the new friend of the incumbent telcos, as the only commish against Martin’s plan. UPDATES, after the jump.

“The FCC took real but incomplete progress this afternoon,” said Rick Whitt, Google’s lead policy exec, in a conference call Tuesday afternoon, lauding the openness conditions but lamenting the omission of rules enforcing wholesale access to the spectrum. When asked if Google would still bid on the spectrum, Whitt said Google “didn’t say it wouldn’t,” meaning that Google will make that decision at a later date.

Hundt: Frontline Down, Not Out — A quick call with Frontline Wireless co-founder Reed Hundt following the FCC vote found the former FCC chairman discouraged but not defeated. “The FCC [vote] did not make it impossible for us, but they did make it clear that they weren’t going to use [the auction rules] to alter the importance of Verizon and AT&T,” Hundt said. Hundt’s take is that since the rules do allow for a bidder to construct a private-public partnership for public-safety buildout, there is still a chance for ideas like Frontline’s to succeed, but only if tech companies who agree with its goals stop “acting like warring Scottish clans” and instead band together more closely in their efforts.

Markey Hails Decision — Massachussets Rep. Ed Markey, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, sent an email message praising the rulemaking decision, calling it an “innovation-fostering decision.” Markey’s office said the rules will allow a bidder to assemble enough spectrum to become a national player, and said that getting the open conditions attached to the rulemaking (but not wholesale conditions) was still a win for consumers.

AT&T Happy that Google Didn’t Win — An email statement “attributed to Jim Cicconi, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President, External and Legislative Affairs” said:

Though we have not yet seen the details of today’s decision on the 700 MHz spectrum auction, the FCC appears to have struck a reasonable balance between the competing interests debating the Google Plan. As we’ve previously noted, if Google is serious about introducing a competing business model into the wireless industry, Chairman Martin’s compromise plan allows them to bid in the auction, win the spectrum, and then implement every one of the conditions they seek. We commend the FCC for adopting this approach rather than stacking the deck in Google’s favor.

  1. “Though we have not yet seen the details of today’s decision on the 700 MHz spectrum auction.” -Jim Cicconi, AT&T

    Sure you haven’t, Jim. ;) Sure you haven’t.

    Share
  2. like almost all silicon valley companies, google got its ass kicked by the telcos on telecom regulatory issues. anyone who knows how this is decided at the fcc knew that the game was over when they came out with their childish and incredibly naive PR gambit saying they would bid if their rules got accepted.

    I don’t know who is/was advising them on their reg/PR strategy, but whomever it is, he/she does not have a clue.

    People were in horror in DC when that statement came out, and laughing out loud in San Antonio and Basking Ridge.

    They should continue making money from the advertising business (the one BIG innovation from the company), wasting money in clean energy, vallet parking and hiring hundreds of children to do special projects, and leave the telecom world for the grown ups. Unfortunately they cant play yet, and we are all stuck with the de facto AT&T-VZ duopoly.

    Share
  3. This is great, as the open mobile internet will not only increase the number of applications developed, but give consumers a richer experience, regardless of the device they carry – in mature mobile markets, such as Japan, the growth in off-deck applications usage is tremendous, empowering m-commerce and other innovations that are important to the consumer. –Faraz Syed, CEO of Mobile Complete

    Share
  4. [...] that they’ve revised the rules for the upcoming 700MHz wireless spectrum auction.  Apparently, they’ve adopted the first two of Google’s four proposed openness rules for the [...]

    Share
  5. [...] many in the tech blogosphere, like TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington and GigaOm’s Paul Kapustka, see it as I do…that the FCC’s Republican-led majority had an opportunity to make [...]

    Share
  6. … like Google didn’t know what they were doing! Get real!

    Google probably created a special political algorithm to determine exactly how to play this whole thing.

    Share
  7. Rise of GoogNet — Part 3, Well Sort Of…

    Most of you know about the FCC auction of 700 MHZ spectrum. I covered it in a previous post. Google had thrown the gauntlet in the game and asked FCC to include following conditions in the auction rules:

    Open Apps
    Open Devices
    Open Services
    Open Netw…

    Share
  8. [...] read more | digg story [...]

    Share
  9. [...] broadcasters will partially be auctioned off next year and Google wants it. There is some great analysis of the rules and consequences elseware so I’ll spare my .02 cents. My primary thought on the matter is that if the CTIA is so [...]

    Share
  10. I hope this won’t be considered SPAM. I have written an analysis of this announcement and would welcome Om’s input. In summary:
    the new 700 MHz networks will be GSM.
    Vodafone will bid hard.
    The incumbents will soon be hating life.
    The “no contract” operators will be short-term winners.

    I’ve been a fan from the “Om on Broadband” days an would welcome his thoughts. Thank-you.

    http://www.teletips.net/2007/07/31/google-scores-a-victory-for-consumers/

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post