<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VoIP and P2P, the Telco Kryptonite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tiseo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-406105</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tiseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-406105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Kevin Walsh: &quot;the best way to get Government to do your dirty work for your is to dress it up in positive words like “open” and “fair” and “neutral.”&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This assumes incumbents built their networks without the help of the Government, sometimes faintly remembered in the US as &quot;We The People&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin Walsh: &#8220;the best way to get Government to do your dirty work for your is to dress it up in positive words like “open” and “fair” and “neutral.”&#8221;</p>

<p>This assumes incumbents built their networks without the help of the Government, sometimes faintly remembered in the US as &#8220;We The People&#8221;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coleman Foley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-403835</link>
		<dc:creator>Coleman Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-403835</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Faith-based entrepreneuralism&quot;...haha&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Faith-based entrepreneuralism&#8221;&#8230;haha</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebMetricsGuru</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-402927</link>
		<dc:creator>WebMetricsGuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-402927</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;700mhz Specturm Deal - Google gets half of what it wanted - GigaOM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;700mhz Spectrum Auction &quot;Google&quot; deal is in&#160; - FCC Gives Google Half a&#160;Win&#160;says Paul Kapustka over at GigaOm.&quot;...The FCC took real but incomplete progress this afternoon,&#8221; said Rick Whitt, Google&#8217;s lead policy ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>700mhz Specturm Deal &#8211; Google gets half of what it wanted &#8211; GigaOM</strong></p>

<p>700mhz Spectrum Auction &quot;Google&quot; deal is in&nbsp; &#8211; FCC Gives Google Half a&nbsp;Win&nbsp;says Paul Kapustka over at GigaOm.&quot;&#8230;The FCC took real but incomplete progress this afternoon,&rdquo; said Rick Whitt, Google&rsquo;s lead policy &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM FCC Gives Google Half a Win &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-402755</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM FCC Gives Google Half a Win &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-402755</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] FCC site, but it looks like the rules passed on a 4-1 vote, with commissioner Robert McDowell, the new friend of the incumbent telcos, as the only commish against Martin&#8217;s plan. More as we learn more.     Share This  &#124; Sphere &#124; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FCC site, but it looks like the rules passed on a 4-1 vote, with commissioner Robert McDowell, the new friend of the incumbent telcos, as the only commish against Martin&#8217;s plan. More as we learn more.     Share This  | Sphere | [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-400464</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-400464</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;There is no reason here to blame the telcos for their actions — if your company had buckets of ready cash and a well-established corps of lobbyists, your shareholders would expect no less.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hardly true. That money would be better spent building better networks or delivering a higher level of customer service. Just think of how many call center reps and service techs could be hired for the combined salaries of AT&amp;T or Verizon&#039;s lawyers and lobbyists!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is no reason here to blame the telcos for their actions — if your company had buckets of ready cash and a well-established corps of lobbyists, your shareholders would expect no less.&#8221;</p>

<p>Hardly true. That money would be better spent building better networks or delivering a higher level of customer service. Just think of how many call center reps and service techs could be hired for the combined salaries of AT&amp;T or Verizon&#8217;s lawyers and lobbyists!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-400397</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-400397</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that it is understandable that the incumbents want to keep their position of power. As a consumer, that still leaves me rooting for the new guys - since they are better for the small guy (consumer).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it is understandable that the incumbents want to keep their position of power. As a consumer, that still leaves me rooting for the new guys &#8211; since they are better for the small guy (consumer).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399926</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399926</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Fight for the 700 MHz Spectrum:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GigaOm believes that despite Google&#039;s bid, the entrenched telecommunications companies will do everything in their power to prevent the 700 MHz spectrum from become an open wireless broadband channel....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Fight for the 700 MHz Spectrum:</strong></p>

<p>GigaOm believes that despite Google&#8217;s bid, the entrenched telecommunications companies will do everything in their power to prevent the 700 MHz spectrum from become an open wireless broadband channel&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399721</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399721</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We’ll see what the FCC proposes.  Let’s hope it’s not more smoke and mirrors like Martin’s moves over the recent past; pitching the media on the idea that he supports &quot;open access . . ,&quot; while suggesting rules that would enable the incumbents to get what they want.  It’s been almost humorous (in a sick sort of way) to read articles about AT&amp;T and Verizon’s “change of heart” regarding Martin’s recommendations for “open access” – as if there was anything truly threatening to them in Martin’s suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Martin also set himself up to be able to claim, as a response to the Skype petition, that the FCC doesn&#039;t have to change any of its current policies regarding wireless communications (i.e., doesn&#039;t have to require true open access to the Internet, etc.), because a portion of the 700-megahertz spectrum will be dedicated to that purpose.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tate’s responses on the Hill (regarding the 700-megahertz spectrum) to questions about what may be the most important policy decisions of her tenure were particularly perplexing, “I don’t have an opinion on that issue . . . .”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let’s hope Tate has a well developed opinion fairly soon, and that Martin and McDowell propose something that is consistent with their professed fondness for openness, competition and innovation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ll see what the FCC proposes.  Let’s hope it’s not more smoke and mirrors like Martin’s moves over the recent past; pitching the media on the idea that he supports &#8220;open access . . ,&#8221; while suggesting rules that would enable the incumbents to get what they want.  It’s been almost humorous (in a sick sort of way) to read articles about AT&amp;T and Verizon’s “change of heart” regarding Martin’s recommendations for “open access” – as if there was anything truly threatening to them in Martin’s suggestions.</p>

<p>Martin also set himself up to be able to claim, as a response to the Skype petition, that the FCC doesn&#8217;t have to change any of its current policies regarding wireless communications (i.e., doesn&#8217;t have to require true open access to the Internet, etc.), because a portion of the 700-megahertz spectrum will be dedicated to that purpose.</p>

<p>Tate’s responses on the Hill (regarding the 700-megahertz spectrum) to questions about what may be the most important policy decisions of her tenure were particularly perplexing, “I don’t have an opinion on that issue . . . .”</p>

<p>Let’s hope Tate has a well developed opinion fairly soon, and that Martin and McDowell propose something that is consistent with their professed fondness for openness, competition and innovation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Walsh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399715</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course Google can lay fiber to the home. Or buy spectrum and then build and operate networks to use it. If they did they would then become an incumbent and would find themselves doing the same things other incumbents do (or any business or individual does for that matter)—try to maximize the value of what they’ve built.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you’re a non-incumbent (as Google is today), then your objectives are different. You want Government to force incumbents to let you use their networks at little or no cost. And the best way to get Government to do your dirty work for your is to dress it up in positive words like “open” and “fair” and “neutral.”&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Google can lay fiber to the home. Or buy spectrum and then build and operate networks to use it. If they did they would then become an incumbent and would find themselves doing the same things other incumbents do (or any business or individual does for that matter)—try to maximize the value of what they’ve built.</p>

<p>If you’re a non-incumbent (as Google is today), then your objectives are different. You want Government to force incumbents to let you use their networks at little or no cost. And the best way to get Government to do your dirty work for your is to dress it up in positive words like “open” and “fair” and “neutral.”</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eideard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399697</link>
		<dc:creator>Eideard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Regulatory influence&quot; - has a much nicer ring to it - even if &quot;twisting arms of the politicians they already have in their pockets&quot; is closer to the reality.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Regulatory influence&#8221; &#8211; has a much nicer ring to it &#8211; even if &#8220;twisting arms of the politicians they already have in their pockets&#8221; is closer to the reality.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399588</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/voip-and-p2p-the-telco-kryptonite/#comment-399588</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can Google lay fiber to the home?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Google lay fiber to the home?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
