<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cost of Carbon Capture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codexis Aims to Bridge Biotech and Carbon Capture</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Codexis Aims to Bridge Biotech and Carbon Capture]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] capture remains unproven in large-scale projects and hugely expensive, but it&#8217;s deemed essential by the International Energy Agency and many governments as a tool [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] capture remains unproven in large-scale projects and hugely expensive, but it&#8217;s deemed essential by the International Energy Agency and many governments as a tool [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If you charge power plants per ton for the CO2 emissions it makes the clean technology more viable. A policy framework may be needed to do so.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you charge power plants per ton for the CO2 emissions it makes the clean technology more viable. A policy framework may be needed to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earth2Tech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FAQ: Carbon Capture &#38; Sequestration</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Earth2Tech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FAQ: Carbon Capture &#38; Sequestration]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to coal? The problem is that capturing carbon coming out of coal plants is expensive &#8212; 1 to 5 cents per kilowatt-hour more expensive &#8212; and at this point, experimental, too. Here&#8217;s a breakdown of the CCS scene in terms of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to coal? The problem is that capturing carbon coming out of coal plants is expensive &#8212; 1 to 5 cents per kilowatt-hour more expensive &#8212; and at this point, experimental, too. Here&#8217;s a breakdown of the CCS scene in terms of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQ: Carbon Capture &#38; Sequestration &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FAQ: Carbon Capture &#38; Sequestration &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to coal? The problem is that capturing carbon coming out of coal plants is expensive &#8212; 1 to 5 cents per kilowatt-hour more expensive &#8212; and at this point, experimental, too. Here&#8217;s a breakdown of the CCS scene in terms of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to coal? The problem is that capturing carbon coming out of coal plants is expensive &#8212; 1 to 5 cents per kilowatt-hour more expensive &#8212; and at this point, experimental, too. Here&#8217;s a breakdown of the CCS scene in terms of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OPEC Takes on Global Warming &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OPEC Takes on Global Warming &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Carbon capture and storage remains a largely unproven solution for fossil fuel producers. The technical and financial viability of carbon remediation has yet to move beyond the research phase. While estimates vary wildly, current carbon capture and storage technologies could double the costs of the very energy it&#8217;s cleaning. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carbon capture and storage remains a largely unproven solution for fossil fuel producers. The technical and financial viability of carbon remediation has yet to move beyond the research phase. While estimates vary wildly, current carbon capture and storage technologies could double the costs of the very energy it&#8217;s cleaning. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economics of Carbon Capture and Storage &#171; EE/RE Investing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Economics of Carbon Capture and Storage &#171; EE/RE Investing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] at 3:28 pm &#183; Filed under AES, Geothermal energy, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Economics   Both Carbon capture and storage (CCS) and Enhanced Geothermal Systems need research and development to reach their full pormise of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at 3:28 pm &#183; Filed under AES, Geothermal energy, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Economics   Both Carbon capture and storage (CCS) and Enhanced Geothermal Systems need research and development to reach their full pormise of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Beyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Beyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Also, I think the second paragraph should be 1 to 5 cents per kilowatt/hour.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I think the second paragraph should be 1 to 5 cents per kilowatt/hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Beyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Beyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/30/the-cost-of-carbon-capture/#comment-6636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I read that a New Zealand study showed that wind power is less expensive than coal with carbon capture.  Of course, wind is intermittent and so less convenient than coal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It would also seem that carbon capture would get more expensive over time, as new places to store the carbon would have to be founded and exploited.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that a New Zealand study showed that wind power is less expensive than coal with carbon capture.  Of course, wind is intermittent and so less convenient than coal.</p>
<p>It would also seem that carbon capture would get more expensive over time, as new places to store the carbon would have to be founded and exploited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
