<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T gets a tiny lift from iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Did iPhone Shake Up The Mobile Biz? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM Did iPhone Shake Up The Mobile Biz? &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] (minor) shifts in the overall wireless market share, according to data compiled by UBS Research. As reported earlier, iPhone resulted in 146,000 activations for AT&amp;T, while the actual sales of the device were [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (minor) shifts in the overall wireless market share, according to data compiled by UBS Research. As reported earlier, iPhone resulted in 146,000 activations for AT&amp;T, while the actual sales of the device were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It would be funny if 500,000 iPhones were sold, but only 146,000 activated . . .&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be funny if 500,000 iPhones were sold, but only 146,000 activated . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john griffin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john griffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;with reference to the iPhone debacle, i think they got more bad PR and news coverage out of the launch.  my sister got the phone the first day and it didn&#039;t work for the first 24 hours. she had to go to the AT&amp;T store and wait forever to get it fixed and she is still having problems.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with reference to the iPhone debacle, i think they got more bad PR and news coverage out of the launch.  my sister got the phone the first day and it didn&#8217;t work for the first 24 hours. she had to go to the AT&amp;T store and wait forever to get it fixed and she is still having problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM iPhone and the analyst delusions &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM iPhone and the analyst delusions &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 10:55 AM PT &#124; No comments    Apple is taking it on the chin, well because AT&amp;T didn&#8217;t meet the inflated expectations of analysts. activations. A friend of ours emailed to point out the grand delusion of Wall Street [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 10:55 AM PT | No comments    Apple is taking it on the chin, well because AT&amp;T didn&#8217;t meet the inflated expectations of analysts. activations. A friend of ours emailed to point out the grand delusion of Wall Street [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greendrake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greendrake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Their margins are ~10%? That is simply ridiculous. They will get eatin&#039; alive if this continues for a decade. New business model required.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their margins are ~10%? That is simply ridiculous. They will get eatin&#8217; alive if this continues for a decade. New business model required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;T&#039;s problem could have something to do with systems problems after the SBC merger.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have changed or ordered 5 home phone lines in the past 6 months, mostly to take advantage of new pricing bundles.  In every case customer service has been polite and knowledgeable about services.  But they have never gotten an order right in even 2 tries.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Custom calling services (caller ID, etc.) ordered as bundles have been billed individually, at twice the bundled rate.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Line configuration is always different from what I requested.  Not just little-misunderstanding different - hugely different.  For each of 3 home lines it has taken 4-5 calls to configure them correctly.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;AT&amp;T notified me that my DSL service request had been canceled (turns out they couldn&#039;t deliver it for weeks), then they sent me a modem for the canceled line.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;When I requested another DSL line to replace the canceled one (!), AT&amp;T&#039;s order department phoned later to tell me that the number they had assigned to it was now unavailable.  I called CS, and asked the agent to check again.  &quot;Oh, wait, this is strange, sir.  That number is being held for.... you.&quot;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;T has been good about all this, sending me over $150 in refund checks and promising another $200 of discounts and rebates.  But it can&#039;t be easy to add lots of new lines with an order system designed by the Keystone Kops.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s problem could have something to do with systems problems after the SBC merger.</p>
<p>I have changed or ordered 5 home phone lines in the past 6 months, mostly to take advantage of new pricing bundles.  In every case customer service has been polite and knowledgeable about services.  But they have never gotten an order right in even 2 tries.</p>
<ul>
<li>Custom calling services (caller ID, etc.) ordered as bundles have been billed individually, at twice the bundled rate.</li>
<li>Line configuration is always different from what I requested.  Not just little-misunderstanding different &#8211; hugely different.  For each of 3 home lines it has taken 4-5 calls to configure them correctly.</li>
<li>AT&amp;T notified me that my DSL service request had been canceled (turns out they couldn&#8217;t deliver it for weeks), then they sent me a modem for the canceled line.</li>
<li>When I requested another DSL line to replace the canceled one (!), AT&amp;T&#8217;s order department phoned later to tell me that the number they had assigned to it was now unavailable.  I called CS, and asked the agent to check again.  &#8220;Oh, wait, this is strange, sir.  That number is being held for&#8230;. you.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>AT&amp;T has been good about all this, sending me over $150 in refund checks and promising another $200 of discounts and rebates.  But it can&#8217;t be easy to add lots of new lines with an order system designed by the Keystone Kops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Punch TV</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digital Punch TV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/24/att-gets-a-tiny-lift-from-iphone/#comment-176019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;We love the iPhone! For those who love Web/Tech/Geek News and comedy... Check out Episode 21 of our vLog! We think it&#039;s pretty swell. http://digitalpunch.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/digitalpunch-episode_21/&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We love the iPhone! For those who love Web/Tech/Geek News and comedy&#8230; Check out Episode 21 of our vLog! We think it&#8217;s pretty swell. <a href="http://digitalpunch.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/digitalpunch-episode_21/" rel="nofollow">http://digitalpunch.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/digitalpunch-episode_21/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

