<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LiquidPiston Gets Cash for Engine Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motores más eficientes: cuando los rusos se ponen a pensar&#8230; &#171; Ideas sostenibles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/#comment-6414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Motores más eficientes: cuando los rusos se ponen a pensar&#8230; &#171; Ideas sostenibles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/#comment-6414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fuente: Earth2Tech [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente: Earth2Tech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/#comment-6413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/#comment-6413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s interesting, thanks for the link.  I recently posted about the Loremo diesel car that is slated to be released in 2009.  If I am doing my math correctly, which is a big if these days ;), then this thing can get 157 mpg.
http://gopaultech.com/2007/06/loremo-fuel-efficient-diesel-car/&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting, thanks for the link.  I recently posted about the Loremo diesel car that is slated to be released in 2009.  If I am doing my math correctly, which is a big if these days ;), then this thing can get 157 mpg.<br />
<a href="http://gopaultech.com/2007/06/loremo-fuel-efficient-diesel-car/" rel="nofollow">http://gopaultech.com/2007/06/loremo-fuel-efficient-diesel-car/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Beyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/#comment-6412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Beyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/07/23/liquidpiston-gets-cash-for-engine-tech/#comment-6412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yawn....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Atkinson cycle engines produced today (Toyota Prius, Ford Escape Hybrid) reach 30% efficiency.  If plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) can be made to work (this is likely), then the efficiency of the I.C. engine they contain is a secondary consideration (cost would be the primary consideration).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, if PHEVs cannot be made to work, then an efficiency improvement of this sort for gasoline engines will do little to address our energy problems anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;NOx and CO2 emissions are easily reduced by using methane as a fuel, which, by the way, can be economically produced from renewable sources as well.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn&#8230;.</p>
<p>Atkinson cycle engines produced today (Toyota Prius, Ford Escape Hybrid) reach 30% efficiency.  If plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) can be made to work (this is likely), then the efficiency of the I.C. engine they contain is a secondary consideration (cost would be the primary consideration).</p>
<p>On the other hand, if PHEVs cannot be made to work, then an efficiency improvement of this sort for gasoline engines will do little to address our energy problems anyway.</p>
<p>NOx and CO2 emissions are easily reduced by using methane as a fuel, which, by the way, can be economically produced from renewable sources as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
