<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Thread: Reader Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:57:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introducing the new look GigaOM &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Introducing the new look GigaOM &#171; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] by Om Malik  Friday, November 23, 2007 at 3:15 PM PT &#124; No comments   For the past 12 months, I have often asked you, our community, how  we could improve the site &#8212; how we could make it better, cleaner and [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Om Malik  Friday, November 23, 2007 at 3:15 PM PT | No comments   For the past 12 months, I have often asked you, our community, how  we could improve the site &#8212; how we could make it better, cleaner and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I personally think you should set up a network site (perhaps gigaomnimedia.com) that shows nothing but some of the latest posts from around the network. Somewhere where I can just quickly come to in the morning and catch up on some of the news from around the industry.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think you should set up a network site (perhaps gigaomnimedia.com) that shows nothing but some of the latest posts from around the network. Somewhere where I can just quickly come to in the morning and catch up on some of the news from around the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Smith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clyde Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om, I get what you&#039;re up to.  I was confused cause it seemed like you were asking for feedback but you&#039;ve got the mixed feed of recent posts which is already basically a widget and you&#039;ve got the network site links.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If anything, you could make them more prominent.  For example, the Recent Posts header and the other headers could be even darker.  The site links near the top could be a bit bigger.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems like you&#039;re on top of it and maybe the fact that you&#039;re getting content suggestions is evident that your longtime readers (I&#039;m new) are now satisfied on this issue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m certainly satisfied!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, I get what you&#8217;re up to.  I was confused cause it seemed like you were asking for feedback but you&#8217;ve got the mixed feed of recent posts which is already basically a widget and you&#8217;ve got the network site links.</p>
<p>If anything, you could make them more prominent.  For example, the Recent Posts header and the other headers could be even darker.  The site links near the top could be a bit bigger.</p>
<p>It seems like you&#8217;re on top of it and maybe the fact that you&#8217;re getting content suggestions is evident that your longtime readers (I&#8217;m new) are now satisfied on this issue.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly satisfied!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;couple of thoughts to share:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;the left column sidebar is too thin, so it doesn&#039;t provide for easy headline reading, and it&#039;s easy to completely miss the module for recent posts around the network. that&#039;s probably the bulk of the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;separate modules for each network site (always displayed or randomly selected) would help emphasize each sites specific topical nature&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;as a random aside, i&#039;m not sure i get why broadband, mobile, voice are gigaom topics, but video (newteevee) and lifestyle(web worker?) are independent web sites. so the double navigation at the top kinda throws me, and i don&#039;t click on it usually...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;hope this helps, and keep it up.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couple of thoughts to share:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>the left column sidebar is too thin, so it doesn&#8217;t provide for easy headline reading, and it&#8217;s easy to completely miss the module for recent posts around the network. that&#8217;s probably the bulk of the problem.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>separate modules for each network site (always displayed or randomly selected) would help emphasize each sites specific topical nature</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>as a random aside, i&#8217;m not sure i get why broadband, mobile, voice are gigaom topics, but video (newteevee) and lifestyle(web worker?) are independent web sites. so the double navigation at the top kinda throws me, and i don&#8217;t click on it usually&#8230;</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>hope this helps, and keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Whitehead, Real Time Matrix</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Whitehead, Real Time Matrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since we last met, we&#039;ve evolved our widgets to what we call a &quot;vortex&quot; for just this purpose.  We just launched one for TechCrunch to resolve with a similar issue - consolidate multiple blogs to a single interactive module showing the most recent content.  Users can tune it and copy it straight to their Netvibes or iGoogle page.  We will be unveiling the iJ.am &quot;configurator&quot; at the TechCrunch party 7/27 which will enable anyone to create their own.  Happy to create one for you in the mean time - give me a call.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jeff&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om,</p>
<p>Since we last met, we&#8217;ve evolved our widgets to what we call a &#8220;vortex&#8221; for just this purpose.  We just launched one for TechCrunch to resolve with a similar issue &#8211; consolidate multiple blogs to a single interactive module showing the most recent content.  Users can tune it and copy it straight to their Netvibes or iGoogle page.  We will be unveiling the iJ.am &#8220;configurator&#8221; at the TechCrunch party 7/27 which will enable anyone to create their own.  Happy to create one for you in the mean time &#8211; give me a call.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash Vasudevan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ash Vasudevan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;People have told me that, “oh we didn’t know that foundread.com or webworkerdaily.com were part of your network.” So that is something i am trying to fix.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om, you may want to consider building a widget that pulls together content from all your blog networks and displaying them prominently on the front page (go to www.realtimematrix.com to see an example of a Techcrunch vortex powered by ij.am.). Let me know if we can help pull something like this together for GigaOM.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People have told me that, “oh we didn’t know that foundread.com or webworkerdaily.com were part of your network.” So that is something i am trying to fix.&#8221;</p>
<p>Om, you may want to consider building a widget that pulls together content from all your blog networks and displaying them prominently on the front page (go to <a href="http://www.realtimematrix.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.realtimematrix.com</a> to see an example of a Techcrunch vortex powered by ij.am.). Let me know if we can help pull something like this together for GigaOM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panayotis Vryonis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Panayotis Vryonis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I loved &quot;Om and Nial sessions&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A diggnation-like podcast that sums up of what has happened throughout the network during the week would be much appreciated!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved &#8220;Om and Nial sessions&#8221;.</p>
<p>A diggnation-like podcast that sums up of what has happened throughout the network during the week would be much appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Clyde,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have been trying to show case what&#039;s on our other sites. Basically where I don&#039;t write as much, but other writers are doing a bang up job. People have told me that, &quot;oh we didn&#039;t know that foundread.com or webworkerdaily.com were part of your network.&quot; So  that is something i am trying to fix.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Secondly, I have to admit that i tend to default to the areas of my strength than rest of the market, which i guess is an effective way of dealing with lack of time.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clyde,</p>
<p>I have been trying to show case what&#8217;s on our other sites. Basically where I don&#8217;t write as much, but other writers are doing a bang up job. People have told me that, &#8220;oh we didn&#8217;t know that foundread.com or webworkerdaily.com were part of your network.&#8221; So  that is something i am trying to fix.</p>
<p>Secondly, I have to admit that i tend to default to the areas of my strength than rest of the market, which i guess is an effective way of dealing with lack of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Folks,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks for the feedback. i have been trying to write on different topics, though have stayed away fro SAAS/Enterprise Software type stuff, since those are areas where I have no obvious strength.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regardless, I think you guys do have a good point, and Ramana thanks for reminding me about the reviews. I want to do those, just sometimes put them on the back burner.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will try and be more &quot;timely&quot; as they say.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks,</p>
<p>thanks for the feedback. i have been trying to write on different topics, though have stayed away fro SAAS/Enterprise Software type stuff, since those are areas where I have no obvious strength.</p>
<p>Regardless, I think you guys do have a good point, and Ramana thanks for reminding me about the reviews. I want to do those, just sometimes put them on the back burner.</p>
<p>I will try and be more &#8220;timely&#8221; as they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Smith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clyde Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hopefully you&#039;ll hear from the people who said that but the options you offer seem to cover the obvious possibilities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you have something more specific to work with than a vague general statement like &quot;you guys are not exposing the network content as effectively as you should&quot; which doesn&#039;t really tell you much?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully you&#8217;ll hear from the people who said that but the options you offer seem to cover the obvious possibilities.</p>
<p>Do you have something more specific to work with than a vague general statement like &#8220;you guys are not exposing the network content as effectively as you should&#8221; which doesn&#8217;t really tell you much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I would love to see more coverage on enterprise applications, saas etc. For example coverage on upcoming Netsuite ipo. Analysis on the Netsuite S-1. How it compares with Salesforce when they filed for ipo. Anyalysis and views from blogs that cover these kinds of topics would be very valuable.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see more coverage on enterprise applications, saas etc. For example coverage on upcoming Netsuite ipo. Analysis on the Netsuite S-1. How it compares with Salesforce when they filed for ipo. Anyalysis and views from blogs that cover these kinds of topics would be very valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramana Kovi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramana Kovi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 02:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are heavily focused on broadband, Mobile, Gaming, VOIP.  I know they are dear to you, in my opinion these topics do not really resonate with general audience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you want to be mainstream audience more coverage should go into Office 2.0, Web 2.0, Networking 2.0, Enterprise 2.0.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;You should take advantage of your journalism background to bring down some of the FUD being generated by the vendors and some of the A list bloggers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4.You have no product review section. At least one review per week in a specific product category.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;5.Your home page in the morning should clearly give all the latest news in the market place with your own twist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You should cover Partnerships, M&amp;A and Money tree every week as part of afternoon/evening updates.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>
<p>You are heavily focused on broadband, Mobile, Gaming, VOIP.  I know they are dear to you, in my opinion these topics do not really resonate with general audience.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>If you want to be mainstream audience more coverage should go into Office 2.0, Web 2.0, Networking 2.0, Enterprise 2.0.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>You should take advantage of your journalism background to bring down some of the FUD being generated by the vendors and some of the A list bloggers.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>4.You have no product review section. At least one review per week in a specific product category.</p>
<p>5.Your home page in the morning should clearly give all the latest news in the market place with your own twist.</p>
<ol>
<li>You should cover Partnerships, M&amp;A and Money tree every week as part of afternoon/evening updates.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/07/14/open-thread-reader-feedback/#comment-174653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;How about using a digg-like concept. Let the readers rate the item. And then we could have a separate section on the side that shows sorted top rated items on different time frames - past 1 day, 7 days, 1 month and so on.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about using a digg-like concept. Let the readers rate the item. And then we could have a separate section on the side that shows sorted top rated items on different time frames &#8211; past 1 day, 7 days, 1 month and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

