<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scott Rafer is Facebooking, launching Lookery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gloria Sheridan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-588130</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria Sheridan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 06:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-588130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey old friend, nice photo. Wedding lunch?? Do tell!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey old friend, nice photo. Wedding lunch?? Do tell!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim  roser</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-348568</link>
		<dc:creator>jim  roser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-348568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook will definitely leverage their own ad network. There is no way they would allow this revenue stream to go away. Not sure why these guys would do a preannouncement for a product that many others could do more effectively. From what I can see, neither founders have any ad experience. Good luck fellas...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook will definitely leverage their own ad network. There is no way they would allow this revenue stream to go away. Not sure why these guys would do a preannouncement for a product that many others could do more effectively. From what I can see, neither founders have any ad experience. Good luck fellas&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd sawicki</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-337783</link>
		<dc:creator>todd sawicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-337783</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;between this post and the comments I feel like I know everyone here!  great plug for mcclure and rafer.  having had some very interesting discussions with rafer this spring on the next gen for ad networks I am not surprised to see him and his partner in crime come up with a great idea.  good luck guys - I look forward to learning more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@jeremy - too funny re: widgetcon and the lack of FB discussion. we should catch up sometime.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>between this post and the comments I feel like I know everyone here!  great plug for mcclure and rafer.  having had some very interesting discussions with rafer this spring on the next gen for ad networks I am not surprised to see him and his partner in crime come up with a great idea.  good luck guys &#8211; I look forward to learning more.</p>

<p>@jeremy &#8211; too funny re: widgetcon and the lack of FB discussion. we should catch up sometime.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-337466</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-337466</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook is great, and this new wave of innovation will only allow it to become better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook is great, and this new wave of innovation will only allow it to become better.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336779</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336779</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@tresparfait&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, I should have said &quot;As in many instances,&quot; in my comment. Alas, grammar&#039;s gettin&#039; screwed by the rise of blogging.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om est seulement le pluspart parfait comme tous les autres.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tresparfait</p>

<p>And, I should have said &#8220;As in many instances,&#8221; in my comment. Alas, grammar&#8217;s gettin&#8217; screwed by the rise of blogging.</p>

<p>Om est seulement le pluspart parfait comme tous les autres.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tresparfait</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336696</link>
		<dc:creator>tresparfait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At the risk of being ridiculed, I have to tell you that you have a fine blog post with one exception. You wrote, &quot;Scott Rafer would be a dangerous fellow if he WAS running a hedge fund.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The correct form is, Scott Rafer would be a dangerous fellow if he WERE running a hedge fund. The verb &quot;be&quot; in past tense, subjunctive form becomes &quot;were&quot; as in: if he were, if she were, if I were, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of being ridiculed, I have to tell you that you have a fine blog post with one exception. You wrote, &#8220;Scott Rafer would be a dangerous fellow if he WAS running a hedge fund.&#8221;</p>

<p>The correct form is, Scott Rafer would be a dangerous fellow if he WERE running a hedge fund. The verb &#8220;be&#8221; in past tense, subjunctive form becomes &#8220;were&#8221; as in: if he were, if she were, if I were, etc.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336626</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As with many things, I agree with Narendra.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://rafer.wirelessink.com/?p=71&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with many things, I agree with Narendra.</p>

<p><a href="http://rafer.wirelessink.com/?p=71" rel="nofollow">http://rafer.wirelessink.com/?p=71</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pepper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336548</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Narendra - well, true, they are apps, but the conference is about the marketing of widgets, and you cannot ignore the power of Facebook applications.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Narendra &#8211; well, true, they are apps, but the conference is about the marketing of widgets, and you cannot ignore the power of Facebook applications.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336542</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336542</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Brian, we&#039;re getting our service up ASAP which means CPM for the moment. We completely agree more can be done, but we need to get the targeting to an acceptable level first. Then we&#039;ll offer at least a combo of CPM + CPC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When it comes to CPA, what &quot;A&quot; do you think is appropriate. We don&#039;t have that answer ourselves yet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian, we&#8217;re getting our service up ASAP which means CPM for the moment. We completely agree more can be done, but we need to get the targeting to an acceptable level first. Then we&#8217;ll offer at least a combo of CPM + CPC.</p>

<p>When it comes to CPA, what &#8220;A&#8221; do you think is appropriate. We don&#8217;t have that answer ourselves yet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Yoskovitz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336385</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Yoskovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336385</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think we can all, very comfortably admit at this point, that almost every VC and every startup is looking at a &quot;Facebook strategy.&quot; Whether there&#039;s merit in that or not...without a doubt Facebook put themselves into many, many startups&#039; plans instantly when they launched their apps platform.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can all, very comfortably admit at this point, that almost every VC and every startup is looking at a &#8220;Facebook strategy.&#8221; Whether there&#8217;s merit in that or not&#8230;without a doubt Facebook put themselves into many, many startups&#8217; plans instantly when they launched their apps platform.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336355</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for the link Om :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;best of luck to both Scott &amp; Narendra... certainly seems like a big market opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the link Om :)</p>

<p>best of luck to both Scott &amp; Narendra&#8230; certainly seems like a big market opportunity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dixon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336350</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336350</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefully Lookery will utilize a CPA approach since this is a social space. Any comment on this? Either way I&#039;m sure it will be interesting as it involves co-founders from two companies which keep people first. When is the expected rollout?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully Lookery will utilize a CPA approach since this is a social space. Any comment on this? Either way I&#8217;m sure it will be interesting as it involves co-founders from two companies which keep people first. When is the expected rollout?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cancel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336105</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cancel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Om. I plan on challenging Scott for the startup-addict title. Then he&#039;ll need to change his name.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Robert Dewey &quot;Indeed!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Om. I plan on challenging Scott for the startup-addict title. Then he&#8217;ll need to change his name.</p>

<p>@Robert Dewey &#8220;Indeed!&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRoales</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336101</link>
		<dc:creator>PRoales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336101</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it is time to update the VC Snowman for the Facebook age...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it is time to update the VC Snowman for the Facebook age&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336088</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-336088</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We got past that months ago. I gave up on email and voicemail for you. Now at least I know how to send you notes that you&#039;ll read. :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t see my projects the way you do, but I agree to a certain extent -- managing money for other people is not my game.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dave (a very early user of MyBlogLog and Mashery) and I started doing some business planning around what we think is a large and fundamental problem. We were going to kick it off in the fall but saw this tactical market entry point due to some of the consulting I&#039;ve been doing, so we got off our butts and got to work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Miss ya baby,
Scott&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;P.S. Coffee the week of Aug 6 when I return to SF?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om,</p>

<p>We got past that months ago. I gave up on email and voicemail for you. Now at least I know how to send you notes that you&#8217;ll read. :)</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t see my projects the way you do, but I agree to a certain extent &#8212; managing money for other people is not my game.</p>

<p>Dave (a very early user of MyBlogLog and Mashery) and I started doing some business planning around what we think is a large and fundamental problem. We were going to kick it off in the fall but saw this tactical market entry point due to some of the consulting I&#8217;ve been doing, so we got off our butts and got to work.</p>

<p>Miss ya baby,
Scott</p>

<p>P.S. Coffee the week of Aug 6 when I return to SF?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dewey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-335996</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/#comment-335996</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;David Cancel,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I definitely like the idea. Probably not as big as other ad networks, but there&#039;s no doubt you&#039;ll be bringing in the sense... err... cents.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a logical step... Keep in mind that MySpace will most likely be launching a similar platform, allowing you to expand appropriately, without relying 100% on one network or the other.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Cancel,</p>

<p>I definitely like the idea. Probably not as big as other ad networks, but there&#8217;s no doubt you&#8217;ll be bringing in the sense&#8230; err&#8230; cents.</p>

<p>This is a logical step&#8230; Keep in mind that MySpace will most likely be launching a similar platform, allowing you to expand appropriately, without relying 100% on one network or the other.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
