<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint: Rethinking WiMAX?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-865402</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-865402</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When shopping for broadband, most people choose DSL or cable. But a third alternative is coming. In a normal cell radius deployment of three to ten kilometers, WiMAX systems could deliver up to 40 Mbps per channel, enough bandwidth to simultaneously support hundreds of businesses with T-1 speed connectivity and thousands of residences with DSL speed connectivity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When shopping for broadband, most people choose DSL or cable. But a third alternative is coming. In a normal cell radius deployment of three to ten kilometers, WiMAX systems could deliver up to 40 Mbps per channel, enough bandwidth to simultaneously support hundreds of businesses with T-1 speed connectivity and thousands of residences with DSL speed connectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tan Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-732303</link>
		<dc:creator>Tan Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-732303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WiMAX is a smart move - lots more cost effective.  With Motorola and Intel, there is enough muscle to crush other carriers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you are outgunned, you can't beat the competition by following their footsteps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Screw the analysts -- when does pontification run business?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMAX is a smart move - lots more cost effective.  With Motorola and Intel, there is enough muscle to crush other carriers.</p>
<p>When you are outgunned, you can&#8217;t beat the competition by following their footsteps.</p>
<p>Screw the analysts &#8212; when does pontification run business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-563715</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-563715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;for all you none believers of the wimax, its now time to officially bury the myth. Here is  a testimonial of (www.yourradio105.com)someone who had actually tested and proven the wimax system in less than favourable weather conditions(Hurricane Dean with 158 mph gust of winds)and flying debris.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for all you none believers of the wimax, its now time to officially bury the myth. Here is  a testimonial of (www.yourradio105.com)someone who had actually tested and proven the wimax system in less than favourable weather conditions(Hurricane Dean with 158 mph gust of winds)and flying debris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CH</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-259581</link>
		<dc:creator>CH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-259581</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Next EVDO revs are not anywhere near on par with WiMax. Sprint should stick to its guns and get back to being a technology leader or perish like MCI and AT&#38;T&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next EVDO revs are not anywhere near on par with WiMax. Sprint should stick to its guns and get back to being a technology leader or perish like MCI and AT&amp;T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Ho</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-196822</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-196822</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree that Sprint's placing far too big a bet on an unproven technology... for $3B in capex, I'm not sure I'd invest in something which has yet to generate scale economies or a proven business model, where CPEs are still expensive and few, and which has major market lag time compared to 3G. After all, aren't the next revs of EVDO supposed to be on par with WiMAX?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that Sprint&#8217;s placing far too big a bet on an unproven technology&#8230; for $3B in capex, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d invest in something which has yet to generate scale economies or a proven business model, where CPEs are still expensive and few, and which has major market lag time compared to 3G. After all, aren&#8217;t the next revs of EVDO supposed to be on par with WiMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noga Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-193383</link>
		<dc:creator>Noga Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-193383</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WiMax is unproven technology because no one has tried to prove it yet.  Only once it's tried on a grand scale will we ever know if it works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Noga Rosenthal&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMax is unproven technology because no one has tried to prove it yet.  Only once it&#8217;s tried on a grand scale will we ever know if it works.</p>
<ul>
<li>Noga Rosenthal</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: askey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-189680</link>
		<dc:creator>askey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 05:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-189680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WiMax(called WiBro in here) is not attacked like this in Korea. I think it is because Korea government stumps for it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMax(called WiBro in here) is not attacked like this in Korea. I think it is because Korea government stumps for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KW</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185901</link>
		<dc:creator>KW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185901</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would look for something between Sprint and Comcast real soon. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would look for something between Sprint and Comcast real soon. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inbabble</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185758</link>
		<dc:creator>inbabble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;we got an interview with Wimax chipset vendor TeleCIS... they made a prediction that "within the next four months you will hear Sprint delay their WiMAX Mobile roll out…again.”... i guess the WSJ article gives a few reasons why that may become to be true....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://inbabble.com/2007/06/10/wimax-telecis-interview-and-predictions-on-sprint/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we got an interview with Wimax chipset vendor TeleCIS&#8230; they made a prediction that &#8220;within the next four months you will hear Sprint delay their WiMAX Mobile roll out…again.”&#8230; i guess the WSJ article gives a few reasons why that may become to be true&#8230;.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://inbabble.com/2007/06/10/wimax-telecis-interview-and-predictions-on-sprint/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
