<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint: Rethinking WiMAX?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-865402</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-865402</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When shopping for broadband, most people choose DSL or cable. But a third alternative is coming. In a normal cell radius deployment of three to ten kilometers, WiMAX systems could deliver up to 40 Mbps per channel, enough bandwidth to simultaneously support hundreds of businesses with T-1 speed connectivity and thousands of residences with DSL speed connectivity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When shopping for broadband, most people choose DSL or cable. But a third alternative is coming. In a normal cell radius deployment of three to ten kilometers, WiMAX systems could deliver up to 40 Mbps per channel, enough bandwidth to simultaneously support hundreds of businesses with T-1 speed connectivity and thousands of residences with DSL speed connectivity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tan Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-732303</link>
		<dc:creator>Tan Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-732303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WiMAX is a smart move - lots more cost effective.  With Motorola and Intel, there is enough muscle to crush other carriers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you are outgunned, you can&#039;t beat the competition by following their footsteps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Screw the analysts -- when does pontification run business?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMAX is a smart move &#8211; lots more cost effective.  With Motorola and Intel, there is enough muscle to crush other carriers.</p>

<p>When you are outgunned, you can&#8217;t beat the competition by following their footsteps.</p>

<p>Screw the analysts &#8212; when does pontification run business?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-563715</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-563715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;for all you none believers of the wimax, its now time to officially bury the myth. Here is  a testimonial of (www.yourradio105.com)someone who had actually tested and proven the wimax system in less than favourable weather conditions(Hurricane Dean with 158 mph gust of winds)and flying debris.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for all you none believers of the wimax, its now time to officially bury the myth. Here is  a testimonial of (www.yourradio105.com)someone who had actually tested and proven the wimax system in less than favourable weather conditions(Hurricane Dean with 158 mph gust of winds)and flying debris.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CH</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-259581</link>
		<dc:creator>CH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-259581</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Next EVDO revs are not anywhere near on par with WiMax. Sprint should stick to its guns and get back to being a technology leader or perish like MCI and AT&amp;T&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next EVDO revs are not anywhere near on par with WiMax. Sprint should stick to its guns and get back to being a technology leader or perish like MCI and AT&amp;T</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Ho</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-196822</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-196822</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree that Sprint&#039;s placing far too big a bet on an unproven technology... for $3B in capex, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d invest in something which has yet to generate scale economies or a proven business model, where CPEs are still expensive and few, and which has major market lag time compared to 3G. After all, aren&#039;t the next revs of EVDO supposed to be on par with WiMAX?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that Sprint&#8217;s placing far too big a bet on an unproven technology&#8230; for $3B in capex, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d invest in something which has yet to generate scale economies or a proven business model, where CPEs are still expensive and few, and which has major market lag time compared to 3G. After all, aren&#8217;t the next revs of EVDO supposed to be on par with WiMAX?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noga Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-193383</link>
		<dc:creator>Noga Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-193383</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WiMax is unproven technology because no one has tried to prove it yet.  Only once it&#039;s tried on a grand scale will we ever know if it works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Noga Rosenthal&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMax is unproven technology because no one has tried to prove it yet.  Only once it&#8217;s tried on a grand scale will we ever know if it works.</p>

<ul>
<li>Noga Rosenthal</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: askey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-189680</link>
		<dc:creator>askey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 05:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-189680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WiMax(called WiBro in here) is not attacked like this in Korea. I think it is because Korea government stumps for it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMax(called WiBro in here) is not attacked like this in Korea. I think it is because Korea government stumps for it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KW</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185901</link>
		<dc:creator>KW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185901</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would look for something between Sprint and Comcast real soon. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would look for something between Sprint and Comcast real soon. ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inbabble</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185758</link>
		<dc:creator>inbabble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/sprint-rethinking-wimax/#comment-185758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;we got an interview with Wimax chipset vendor TeleCIS... they made a prediction that &quot;within the next four months you will hear Sprint delay their WiMAX Mobile roll out…again.”... i guess the WSJ article gives a few reasons why that may become to be true....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://inbabble.com/2007/06/10/wimax-telecis-interview-and-predictions-on-sprint/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we got an interview with Wimax chipset vendor TeleCIS&#8230; they made a prediction that &#8220;within the next four months you will hear Sprint delay their WiMAX Mobile roll out…again.”&#8230; i guess the WSJ article gives a few reasons why that may become to be true&#8230;.</p>

<p><a href="http://inbabble.com/2007/06/10/wimax-telecis-interview-and-predictions-on-sprint/" rel="nofollow">http://inbabble.com/2007/06/10/wimax-telecis-interview-and-predictions-on-sprint/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
