<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Video Search, Veoh, Curt Schilling and Start-ups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google shouldn't be a media company but a great video search engine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/#comment-191071</link>
		<dc:creator>Google shouldn't be a media company but a great video search engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/#comment-191071</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds great! It seems that Google finally took the advice I gave in a blog post more than 3 months ago. ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GigaOM was still discussing then whether Google should be a media company or not.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google has to concentrate on video search. When I type &quot;Simpsons&quot; on video.google.com I want to see search results from every possible video website, like they do with normal text websites on their text search. Google&#039;s video search at video.google.com should be like their news search at news.google.com.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I start an investigation about a company I normally type it&#039;s name on news.google.com to know what&#039;s happened to them in the last time. news.google.com is a central point of news search and I don&#039;t have to check anymore news site by news site, like I had to do some years ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;video.google.com should be the same, and it should be just as great. Google doesn&#039;t need to become a content provider. It wasn&#039;t even necessary to buy Youtube.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great! It seems that Google finally took the advice I gave in a blog post more than 3 months ago. ;)</p>

<p>GigaOM was still discussing then whether Google should be a media company or not.</p>

<p>Google has to concentrate on video search. When I type &#8220;Simpsons&#8221; on video.google.com I want to see search results from every possible video website, like they do with normal text websites on their text search. Google&#8217;s video search at video.google.com should be like their news search at news.google.com.</p>

<p>When I start an investigation about a company I normally type it&#8217;s name on news.google.com to know what&#8217;s happened to them in the last time. news.google.com is a central point of news search and I don&#8217;t have to check anymore news site by news site, like I had to do some years ago.</p>

<p>video.google.com should be the same, and it should be just as great. Google doesn&#8217;t need to become a content provider. It wasn&#8217;t even necessary to buy Youtube.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/#comment-187707</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/#comment-187707</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;oops. sorry about that. fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops. sorry about that. fixed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Yanov</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/#comment-187680</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Yanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/google-video-search-veoh-curt-schilling-and-start-ups/#comment-187680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1.65 million would have been a steal!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.65 million would have been a steal!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
