<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: June 11, 2007: Qwest, Dopplr &amp; Continuous Partial Inattention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/06/11/june-11-2007-qwest-dopplr-continuous-partial-inattention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/11/june-11-2007-qwest-dopplr-continuous-partial-inattention/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Neely</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/06/11/june-11-2007-qwest-dopplr-continuous-partial-inattention/#comment-172087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Neely]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/06/11/june-11-2007-qwest-dopplr-continuous-partial-inattention/#comment-172087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Ugh, why would you link to that troll&#039;s new blog? The constant negativity I&#039;ve seen in Donna&#039;s writing has gone past any chance of being characterized as simply &quot;offering a differing point of view&quot;. Her articles continually fail to put news into a balanced context, continually criticize while never offering solutions or praise, and continually use sensationalist writing tactics to distort the truth.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t believe you&#039;re publicizing her.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, why would you link to that troll&#8217;s new blog? The constant negativity I&#8217;ve seen in Donna&#8217;s writing has gone past any chance of being characterized as simply &#8220;offering a differing point of view&#8221;. Her articles continually fail to put news into a balanced context, continually criticize while never offering solutions or praise, and continually use sensationalist writing tactics to distort the truth.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe you&#8217;re publicizing her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

