<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avaya, bit by IP, maybe up for sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/#comment-171305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/#comment-171305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] phone equipment and Internet-based communications for corporations. Press Release &#124; TechCrunch &#124; GigaOm&#124; Collaborative Thinking &#124; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phone equipment and Internet-based communications for corporations. Press Release | TechCrunch | GigaOm| Collaborative Thinking | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letture consigliate - gioved&#236; 31 maggio</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/#comment-171304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Letture consigliate - gioved&#236; 31 maggio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 03:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/#comment-171304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Avaya in vendita La compagnia, un tempo parte del colosso AT&amp;T, potrebbe essere ora acquisita da un rivale come Cisco Systems o Nortel o da un fondo di private equity. Come i concorrenti sta puntando sulla telefonia VoIP ma il settore è sempre più competitivo. (tags: avaya cisco voip pbx business) [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Avaya in vendita La compagnia, un tempo parte del colosso AT&#38;T, potrebbe essere ora acquisita da un rivale come Cisco Systems o Nortel o da un fondo di private equity. Come i concorrenti sta puntando sulla telefonia VoIP ma il settore è sempre più competitivo. (tags: avaya cisco voip pbx business) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor Boguslavsky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/#comment-171303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Igor Boguslavsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 01:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/05/29/avaya-bit-by-ip-is-up-for-sale/#comment-171303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Coincidentally, services and software is what Avaya does not do too well... They&#039;re billing themselves more and more as a &quot;software company&quot;; having released a set of APIs and services to support CTI it&#039;s probably true. However, the old mentality in licensing and total lack of understanding of software business playing against them. Selling out is probably a smart move...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, services and software is what Avaya does not do too well&#8230; They&#8217;re billing themselves more and more as a &#8220;software company&#8221;; having released a set of APIs and services to support CTI it&#8217;s probably true. However, the old mentality in licensing and total lack of understanding of software business playing against them. Selling out is probably a smart move&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

