<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dazed Confused and Technorati</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Crickets</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Crickets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 17:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This marks the beginning of the end for Technorati. The last dinosaur of the dot com bubble.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This marks the beginning of the end for Technorati. The last dinosaur of the dot com bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pwb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Technorati is beyond lame. How hard is it to provide basic blog search?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati is beyond lame. How hard is it to provide basic blog search?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gagan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gagan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 06:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;well we have mashup for combining blog video.. etc. searches technorati was leading their way in Blog search they were quite gud with all those cool features why d hell they are tryin to destroy themselves&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well we have mashup for combining blog video.. etc. searches technorati was leading their way in Blog search they were quite gud with all those cool features why d hell they are tryin to destroy themselves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EAS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EAS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I can understand the shift in focus, but the execution is terrible.  It seems like they should have eased into it more slowly to give their existing users a chance to adjust, and to give themselves time to polish the new features.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the shift in focus, but the execution is terrible.  It seems like they should have eased into it more slowly to give their existing users a chance to adjust, and to give themselves time to polish the new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;After playing around with, I have to admit that I quite like the new feel... with the exception of the homepage ticker :-P&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After playing around with, I have to admit that I quite like the new feel&#8230; with the exception of the homepage ticker :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Ng</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Ng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Why they&#039;re moving away from a &quot;blog-centric&quot; focus is beyond me. :(&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why they&#8217;re moving away from a &#8220;blog-centric&#8221; focus is beyond me. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (living in First Life)</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay (living in First Life)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Forgive the grammatical error earlier.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive the grammatical error earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamla Bhatt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamla Bhatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks goodness I was not the only one feeling &quot;dazed and confused&quot; and thought my &quot;neurons are misfiring.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is with Technorati&#039;s new look?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kamla&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks goodness I was not the only one feeling &#8220;dazed and confused&#8221; and thought my &#8220;neurons are misfiring.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is with Technorati&#8217;s new look?</p>
<p>Kamla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I was a bit confused when I jumped on their today as well.  It looks as if they are jumping on the &quot;universal search&quot; wagon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW - did you notice the digg-clone voting feature they added to the blog search?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;...&quot;WTF?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit confused when I jumped on their today as well.  It looks as if they are jumping on the &#8220;universal search&#8221; wagon.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; did you notice the digg-clone voting feature they added to the blog search?</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8221;WTF?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks Jay - now i will stop searching for that elusive box of advil and get back to work. Yeah - i think this is the fate of many start-ups that are features-posing-as-companies.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jay &#8211; now i will stop searching for that elusive box of advil and get back to work. Yeah &#8211; i think this is the fate of many start-ups that are features-posing-as-companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (living in First Life)</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay (living in First Life)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/dazed-confused-and-technorati/#comment-170956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om, you&#039;re head is fine.  Technorati is going down the toilet.  They at least did one thing marginally well and now they do everything poorly.  This is going to be a disaster.  At least Yahoo might have bought them earlier.  Google BlogSearch is going to dominate them.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, you&#8217;re head is fine.  Technorati is going down the toilet.  They at least did one thing marginally well and now they do everything poorly.  This is going to be a disaster.  At least Yahoo might have bought them earlier.  Google BlogSearch is going to dominate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

