<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trials of Mobile WiMAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/22/nthair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/22/nthair/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ValleyGrunt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ValleyGrunt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 00:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Minor problem with Jesse&#039;s claim above: With WiFi being unlicensed spectrum, the power output is limited by FCC (and hence very poor building penetration, if at all..Hell, I can&#039;t get decent coverage from my own unit in my home) and it will be a junkyard of signals emanating from everyone&#039;s home WiFi units interfering with each other. No guarantee of access, no guarantee of QoS of any type. Mobile WiMAX has all those advantages; but that said I don&#039;t think it is going to displace cellular data (3G &amp; its variants) anytime soon.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor problem with Jesse&#8217;s claim above: With WiFi being unlicensed spectrum, the power output is limited by FCC (and hence very poor building penetration, if at all..Hell, I can&#8217;t get decent coverage from my own unit in my home) and it will be a junkyard of signals emanating from everyone&#8217;s home WiFi units interfering with each other. No guarantee of access, no guarantee of QoS of any type. Mobile WiMAX has all those advantages; but that said I don&#8217;t think it is going to displace cellular data (3G &amp; its variants) anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;WiFi does support handoffs and security. WiMAX will face building penetration challenges too. WiFi is still cheaper to build out. WiMAX will be less expensive to maintain.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiFi does support handoffs and security. WiMAX will face building penetration challenges too. WiFi is still cheaper to build out. WiMAX will be less expensive to maintain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Wifi is not secure, does not sopprt hand offs, does not have good in building coverage and by nature is a lot more expensive to build out and maintain&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wifi is not secure, does not sopprt hand offs, does not have good in building coverage and by nature is a lot more expensive to build out and maintain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pradeep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/22/nthair/#comment-170922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Is wimax still needed if you have free wifi deployment ?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is wimax still needed if you have free wifi deployment ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

