<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mashup litmus test for Web 2.0 start-ups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco DeParis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesco DeParis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 22:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;As unlikely as it seems from the outset, I think traditional media companies (TMC) will ultimately rule the web 2.0/New Media space.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://themediaage.com/?p=76&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TMCs will surely become the next VCs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As unlikely as it seems from the outset, I think traditional media companies (TMC) will ultimately rule the web 2.0/New Media space.  <a href="http://themediaage.com/?p=76" rel="nofollow">TMCs will surely become the next VCs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kamleitner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Kamleitner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;ps: think you&#039;ve got the URL wrong:
http://pwp.007mundo.com/jcmendez/flash/youtube/LastFmYoutube.html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps: think you&#8217;ve got the URL wrong:<br />
<a href="http://pwp.007mundo.com/jcmendez/flash/youtube/LastFmYoutube.html" rel="nofollow">http://pwp.007mundo.com/jcmendez/flash/youtube/LastFmYoutube.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kamleitner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Kamleitner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;some well-thought points Janko. I was asking myself the same questions regarding niche mapping mashups when Google released their My Maps few weeks ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;but as I pointed out (http://nonsmokingarea.com/blog/2007/05/14/lasttube-mixing-lastfm-youtube-again/), I guess it&#039;s really not fair to ask for economic value in most mashups, as they are simply fun, creative, quick hacks not even intended to have a &quot;business modell&quot;...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some well-thought points Janko. I was asking myself the same questions regarding niche mapping mashups when Google released their My Maps few weeks ago.</p>
<p>but as I pointed out (<a href="http://nonsmokingarea.com/blog/2007/05/14/lasttube-mixing-lastfm-youtube-again/" rel="nofollow">http://nonsmokingarea.com/blog/2007/05/14/lasttube-mixing-lastfm-youtube-again/</a>), I guess it&#8217;s really not fair to ask for economic value in most mashups, as they are simply fun, creative, quick hacks not even intended to have a &#8220;business modell&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Zaf</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dexter Zaf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There are already a lot of video sites out there. I don&#039;t know how many of those sites are actually earning revenue through Ads to offset the operating cost.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are already a lot of video sites out there. I don&#8217;t know how many of those sites are actually earning revenue through Ads to offset the operating cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Judson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Judson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 08:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/lastfm-mashups/#comment-170400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Janko:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is an important article. There is one even larger question. Yahoo Pipes says it is not interfering with the &quot;existing monetization models&quot; of Web 2.0 businesses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The real question in my mind is whether, for the vast majority of these businesses, a model exists at all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As we have seen before, simply because some seemingly very smart VC&#039;s are willing to give you money is no guarantee that you have a viable concept.  How many of today&#039;s 1000+ Web 2.0 startups will ever realize any substantial revenues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The amount of real value that is now available for free on the Web means that consumers and businesses are increasingly questioning what they need to spend money on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suspect these issues will become even more important over the next several months.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bruce Judson
http://www.VenturesWithoutCapital.com&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janko:</p>
<p>This is an important article. There is one even larger question. Yahoo Pipes says it is not interfering with the &#8220;existing monetization models&#8221; of Web 2.0 businesses.</p>
<p>The real question in my mind is whether, for the vast majority of these businesses, a model exists at all.</p>
<p>As we have seen before, simply because some seemingly very smart VC&#8217;s are willing to give you money is no guarantee that you have a viable concept.  How many of today&#8217;s 1000+ Web 2.0 startups will ever realize any substantial revenues.</p>
<p>The amount of real value that is now available for free on the Web means that consumers and businesses are increasingly questioning what they need to spend money on.</p>
<p>I suspect these issues will become even more important over the next several months.</p>
<p>Bruce Judson<br />
<a href="http://www.VenturesWithoutCapital.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.VenturesWithoutCapital.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
