<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M Dot: Web&#8217;s Answer to Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shallom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shallom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi
the url which i have given u is one of the mobile site.here i just need to configure autodetect when the user open the main website through mobile it has to detect to mobile site instead of website.this should happen when the user wants to open throgh mobile,if user want to open throgh his pc normally the original website should open.can u please help me out in this issue.once you get my mail please respond to shallom.jarisinc@gmail.com

Thanks
Shallom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
the url which i have given u is one of the mobile site.here i just need to configure autodetect when the user open the main website through mobile it has to detect to mobile site instead of website.this should happen when the user wants to open throgh mobile,if user want to open throgh his pc normally the original website should open.can u please help me out in this issue.once you get my mail please respond to <a href="mailto:shallom.jarisinc@gmail.com">shallom.jarisinc@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Shallom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fox</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Fox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;another reason for &quot;m.&quot; - the soft keyboard setup on the iPhone fills in &quot;.com&quot;. Now we  really ARE talking about less typing.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another reason for &#8220;m.&#8221; &#8211; the soft keyboard setup on the iPhone fills in &#8220;.com&#8221;. Now we  really ARE talking about less typing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This article was published June 12, 2007 in TechNewsWorld. Like everyone else, we&#039;re looking forward to seeing how this all plays out. Comments welcomed and appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Scott&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ARTICLE STARTS:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With more than 4 billion cell phones in use worldwide -- 487 million in China alone -- it&#039;s no wonder that &quot;mobile&quot; is all the rage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A recent segment of &quot;American Idol&quot; received nearly 80 million text message votes. The 2008 U.S. presidential candidates are incorporating mobile communications elements into their campaigns. Social networks such as MySpace Latest News about MySpace and Twitter are starting to deploy mobile-friendly Web sites. Most mobile access is achieved via traditional methods such as wireless carrier &quot;walled garden&quot; decks, short codes, text messaging and often lengthy, convoluted sub-domains.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It begs the question: Is there a simpler, perhaps more powerful mobile access and branding Email Marketing Software - Free Demo tool that has largely gone unnoticed?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Internet and the cell phone are colliding as the media evolve to satisfy our need to socialize and to share information. Personalized mobility will become the norm. If people are going to access Web sites via cell phones, why not make it easy by using numbers instead of letters?
Numeric Domains 101&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On billions of cell phones worldwide, the dial pad numbers 2 through 9 can represent letters of the alphabet. The numeral 2 can represent &quot;a,&quot; &quot;b&quot; or &quot;c.&quot; The &quot;7&quot; button can represent &quot;p,&quot; &quot;q,&quot; &quot;r&quot; or &quot;s,&quot; etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Therefore, any string of numbers can represent multiple alpha equivalents. The numbers 3776 can represent 144 alpha combinations (3 can represent d, e or f; 7 can represent p, q, r or s; 6 can represent m, n or o). The numbers 3776 could represent &quot;Esso;&quot; it could also represent &quot;ESPN&quot; or 142 other unique alpha combinations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On your cell phone WAP Latest News about WAP (wireless application protocol) browser, entering a numeric string and adding &quot;.com&quot; creates a numeric domain.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Until the domain is specifically purposed, it&#039;s just that -- a string of numbers, no trademark issues and no squatting issues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Organizations incorporate numeric domains into their overall marketing mix depending on their respective goals and strategies:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;* The numeric domain is the brand. Some of the world&#039;s most popular Web sites use numeric-domains as their primary Web sites, including 163.com, 126.com, 888.com and 51.com.

  Numeric domains can be the brand or help to strengthen the brand. The numeric feature can clearly indicate that the WAP site has been specifically formatted for optimum viewing and navigation on cell phones.

* Simple input. It&#039;s much easier to enter 3776 (.com) -- four input clicks -- than it is to enter a lengthy sub-domain required to get to the same Web site such as mobileapp.espn.go (.com), requiring 32 input clicks.

  Numeric-domains reduce keypad input clicks, thereby reducing input error, frustration and abandonment. Numeric-domains are handheld device, wireless carrier, language and location agnostic.

* Reduce dependency on wireless carrier &quot;decks.&quot; Wireless carriers offer premium content (ringtones, music, etc.) to their customers via &quot;on-deck&quot; portals, or &quot;walled gardens.&quot; Content providers typically pay dearly to list and sell their content on-deck, yet have little influence over location, positioning and the amount of promotion done by the carrier.

  Numeric domains allow content providers a direct link to their customers and full control of and responsibility for the user experience.

* Exert more consumer influence. Wireless carriers play a crucial role in the wireless Internet ecosystem. However, the growing migration of content owners bypassing wireless carriers&#039; expensive billing costs to deliver content direct to consumer is rampant.

  Numeric domains enable direct-to-consumer access and a wide variety of payment options.

* Short code avoidance, direct-to-consumer delivery. Carrier-controlled short codes are not owned by the content providers. Codes are rented on a monthly basis, can take months to secure and typically are used only for short &quot;campaign&quot; durations.

  Organizations that own their numeric domain enjoy longer lead times for planning campaigns and can associate the numeric domain with, and strengthen, their brand.

* Short codes restrictions. Short codes are geographically restricted to the reach of the carrier network. This is usually not a problem for local or regional campaigns. However, for international campaigns, companies need to schedule, manage and pay for multiple short codes.

  Numeric domains are equal in the entire global community. The code 3776 is the same in Beijing, Boston or Bali. This ensures that anyone anywhere on the planet with a WAP browser and network access can reach your Web anytime, day or night.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why are numeric domains only surfacing now? Perhaps for a number of reasons -- fear of the unknown, early-adopter reluctance and the evolving technical expertise to deliver a &quot;beyond expectations&quot; mobile user experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &quot;wireless&quot; Internet is in its embryonic stages. Access methods such as short codes and text messaging were designed and developed by the carriers and touted by the service providers and/or aggregators. Not surprisingly, each step incorporated substantial profit centers for the emerging cabals. Want a short code? Want to send a text message? Want your content delivered to wireless subscribers? Want that application preloaded on these phones? If so, you&#039;re forced to pay the piper.
A Place in the Ecosystem&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Major brands that could afford the higher costs often followed the advice of ad agencies and aggregators. Wireless is new. How do we get into the game and measure results? What will it cost?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The answers, and the solutions, were proffered and spoon-fed by the aggregators, ad agencies and the carriers. With substantial mass-media advertising, the result became the accepted way to communicate a message, engage the consumer and to sell a product or service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The industry is maturing and there are alternatives available that many people may not be aware of. However, if embraced and employed, these new tools could dramatically improve on current industry practices.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will numeric domains find a prominent place in the wireless ecosystem? It would seem so. Reported sales of numeric-domains have exploded recently. 15.com just sold for US$100,000, 20.com sold for $75,000, and dozens of others have traded for over $100,000 in private sales.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Many companies are learning the value, ease of use and versatility numeric domains. As more and more Web and WAP sites -- such as the recently launched 41414.com and the heavily venture capital-backed www.80108.com jump into the fray, it would appear that the numbers are heating up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have you got your number?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Scott Smith is president and CEO of ArcNum and cochairs the off-portal committee for the Mobile Marketing Association.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was published June 12, 2007 in TechNewsWorld. Like everyone else, we&#8217;re looking forward to seeing how this all plays out. Comments welcomed and appreciated.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Scott</p>
<p>ARTICLE STARTS:</p>
<p>With more than 4 billion cell phones in use worldwide &#8212; 487 million in China alone &#8212; it&#8217;s no wonder that &#8220;mobile&#8221; is all the rage.</p>
<p>A recent segment of &#8220;American Idol&#8221; received nearly 80 million text message votes. The 2008 U.S. presidential candidates are incorporating mobile communications elements into their campaigns. Social networks such as MySpace Latest News about MySpace and Twitter are starting to deploy mobile-friendly Web sites. Most mobile access is achieved via traditional methods such as wireless carrier &#8220;walled garden&#8221; decks, short codes, text messaging and often lengthy, convoluted sub-domains.</p>
<p>It begs the question: Is there a simpler, perhaps more powerful mobile access and branding Email Marketing Software &#8211; Free Demo tool that has largely gone unnoticed?</p>
<p>The Internet and the cell phone are colliding as the media evolve to satisfy our need to socialize and to share information. Personalized mobility will become the norm. If people are going to access Web sites via cell phones, why not make it easy by using numbers instead of letters?<br />
Numeric Domains 101</p>
<p>On billions of cell phones worldwide, the dial pad numbers 2 through 9 can represent letters of the alphabet. The numeral 2 can represent &#8220;a,&#8221; &#8220;b&#8221; or &#8220;c.&#8221; The &#8220;7&#8243; button can represent &#8220;p,&#8221; &#8220;q,&#8221; &#8220;r&#8221; or &#8220;s,&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>Therefore, any string of numbers can represent multiple alpha equivalents. The numbers 3776 can represent 144 alpha combinations (3 can represent d, e or f; 7 can represent p, q, r or s; 6 can represent m, n or o). The numbers 3776 could represent &#8220;Esso;&#8221; it could also represent &#8220;ESPN&#8221; or 142 other unique alpha combinations.</p>
<p>On your cell phone WAP Latest News about WAP (wireless application protocol) browser, entering a numeric string and adding &#8220;.com&#8221; creates a numeric domain.</p>
<p>Until the domain is specifically purposed, it&#8217;s just that &#8212; a string of numbers, no trademark issues and no squatting issues.</p>
<p>Organizations incorporate numeric domains into their overall marketing mix depending on their respective goals and strategies:</p>
<pre><code>* The numeric domain is the brand. Some of the world's most popular Web sites use numeric-domains as their primary Web sites, including 163.com, 126.com, 888.com and 51.com.

  Numeric domains can be the brand or help to strengthen the brand. The numeric feature can clearly indicate that the WAP site has been specifically formatted for optimum viewing and navigation on cell phones.

* Simple input. It's much easier to enter 3776 (.com) -- four input clicks -- than it is to enter a lengthy sub-domain required to get to the same Web site such as mobileapp.espn.go (.com), requiring 32 input clicks.

  Numeric-domains reduce keypad input clicks, thereby reducing input error, frustration and abandonment. Numeric-domains are handheld device, wireless carrier, language and location agnostic.

* Reduce dependency on wireless carrier "decks." Wireless carriers offer premium content (ringtones, music, etc.) to their customers via "on-deck" portals, or "walled gardens." Content providers typically pay dearly to list and sell their content on-deck, yet have little influence over location, positioning and the amount of promotion done by the carrier.

  Numeric domains allow content providers a direct link to their customers and full control of and responsibility for the user experience.

* Exert more consumer influence. Wireless carriers play a crucial role in the wireless Internet ecosystem. However, the growing migration of content owners bypassing wireless carriers' expensive billing costs to deliver content direct to consumer is rampant.

  Numeric domains enable direct-to-consumer access and a wide variety of payment options.

* Short code avoidance, direct-to-consumer delivery. Carrier-controlled short codes are not owned by the content providers. Codes are rented on a monthly basis, can take months to secure and typically are used only for short "campaign" durations.

  Organizations that own their numeric domain enjoy longer lead times for planning campaigns and can associate the numeric domain with, and strengthen, their brand.

* Short codes restrictions. Short codes are geographically restricted to the reach of the carrier network. This is usually not a problem for local or regional campaigns. However, for international campaigns, companies need to schedule, manage and pay for multiple short codes.

  Numeric domains are equal in the entire global community. The code 3776 is the same in Beijing, Boston or Bali. This ensures that anyone anywhere on the planet with a WAP browser and network access can reach your Web anytime, day or night.
</code></pre>
<p>Why are numeric domains only surfacing now? Perhaps for a number of reasons &#8212; fear of the unknown, early-adopter reluctance and the evolving technical expertise to deliver a &#8220;beyond expectations&#8221; mobile user experience.</p>
<p>The &#8220;wireless&#8221; Internet is in its embryonic stages. Access methods such as short codes and text messaging were designed and developed by the carriers and touted by the service providers and/or aggregators. Not surprisingly, each step incorporated substantial profit centers for the emerging cabals. Want a short code? Want to send a text message? Want your content delivered to wireless subscribers? Want that application preloaded on these phones? If so, you&#8217;re forced to pay the piper.<br />
A Place in the Ecosystem</p>
<p>Major brands that could afford the higher costs often followed the advice of ad agencies and aggregators. Wireless is new. How do we get into the game and measure results? What will it cost?</p>
<p>The answers, and the solutions, were proffered and spoon-fed by the aggregators, ad agencies and the carriers. With substantial mass-media advertising, the result became the accepted way to communicate a message, engage the consumer and to sell a product or service.</p>
<p>The industry is maturing and there are alternatives available that many people may not be aware of. However, if embraced and employed, these new tools could dramatically improve on current industry practices.</p>
<p>Will numeric domains find a prominent place in the wireless ecosystem? It would seem so. Reported sales of numeric-domains have exploded recently. 15.com just sold for US$100,000, 20.com sold for $75,000, and dozens of others have traded for over $100,000 in private sales.</p>
<p>Many companies are learning the value, ease of use and versatility numeric domains. As more and more Web and WAP sites &#8212; such as the recently launched 41414.com and the heavily venture capital-backed <a href="http://www.80108.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.80108.com</a> jump into the fray, it would appear that the numbers are heating up.</p>
<p>Have you got your number?</p>
<p>Scott Smith is president and CEO of ArcNum and cochairs the off-portal committee for the Mobile Marketing Association.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 22:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Many hundreds, even thousands of large corps have begun to use, and even market their .mobi sites...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;examples include: msn.mobi, amtrak.mobi, nba.mobi, bofa.mobi, ferrari.mobi, yahoo.mobi, google.mobi, bmw.mobi, statefarm.mobi, sas.mobi, polo.mobi, businessweek.mobi, foxnews.mobi and hundreds more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why? Because mobi is sexy!!! From a marketing point of view, which looks better? m.polo.com or Polo.mobi?  Stop thinking like techies and think like teenagers - who will someday rule the internet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s not to say, there won&#039;t be room for both standards - some may not be able to get the mobi version of their .com /.net /.org /.whatever, so they will have to settle for the m.subdomain, or domain/m, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The trouble with m.domain standard is there is no organized force behind it, whereas .mobi has a consortium of mobile industry leaders, such as Nokia, Samsung, Ericsson, GSM Association, Hutchison, Microsoft, Orascom Telecom, Syniverse, T-Mobile, Telefónica Móviles, TIM and Vodafone behind it, as well as investment from Google, Microsoft, and Visa.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With this kind of consortium, we may even see such things as .mobi hotkeys or mobile defaults - which would not just make typing .mobi a non-issue, it would catapault .mobi leaps and bounds ahead of any other extension.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mobi has hit the emerging North American mobile market with perfect timing. With an expected million .mobi registrations within the coming year, all this new mobile content will be getting marketed by late 2007, and .mobi will explode into the public consciousness all at once.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wise firms are readying their .mobi sites even as we chat.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many hundreds, even thousands of large corps have begun to use, and even market their .mobi sites&#8230;</p>
<p>examples include: msn.mobi, amtrak.mobi, nba.mobi, bofa.mobi, ferrari.mobi, yahoo.mobi, google.mobi, bmw.mobi, statefarm.mobi, sas.mobi, polo.mobi, businessweek.mobi, foxnews.mobi and hundreds more.</p>
<p>Why? Because mobi is sexy!!! From a marketing point of view, which looks better? m.polo.com or Polo.mobi?  Stop thinking like techies and think like teenagers &#8211; who will someday rule the internet.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say, there won&#8217;t be room for both standards &#8211; some may not be able to get the mobi version of their .com /.net /.org /.whatever, so they will have to settle for the m.subdomain, or domain/m, etc.</p>
<p>The trouble with m.domain standard is there is no organized force behind it, whereas .mobi has a consortium of mobile industry leaders, such as Nokia, Samsung, Ericsson, GSM Association, Hutchison, Microsoft, Orascom Telecom, Syniverse, T-Mobile, Telefónica Móviles, TIM and Vodafone behind it, as well as investment from Google, Microsoft, and Visa.</p>
<p>With this kind of consortium, we may even see such things as .mobi hotkeys or mobile defaults &#8211; which would not just make typing .mobi a non-issue, it would catapault .mobi leaps and bounds ahead of any other extension.</p>
<p>Mobi has hit the emerging North American mobile market with perfect timing. With an expected million .mobi registrations within the coming year, all this new mobile content will be getting marketed by late 2007, and .mobi will explode into the public consciousness all at once.</p>
<p>Wise firms are readying their .mobi sites even as we chat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The &quot;extra effort&quot; to get content negotiation working is just on the part of the server maintainers (who are supposed to be up on such techie stuff anyway)... it&#039;s no effort at all on the part of the end users, who just have to enter the address of the site, the same in both mobile and non-mobile devices, to get to it.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;extra effort&#8221; to get content negotiation working is just on the part of the server maintainers (who are supposed to be up on such techie stuff anyway)&#8230; it&#8217;s no effort at all on the part of the end users, who just have to enter the address of the site, the same in both mobile and non-mobile devices, to get to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;http://m.cnet.com and http://m.news.com/ have been around for 2 or 3 years. Brevity is all. Content negotiation on the server sounds great, but hardly worth the extra effort.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://m.cnet.com" rel="nofollow">http://m.cnet.com</a> and <a href="http://m.news.com/" rel="nofollow">http://m.news.com/</a> have been around for 2 or 3 years. Brevity is all. Content negotiation on the server sounds great, but hardly worth the extra effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t the support of alternate data formats at the same URL part of the standard HTTP content negotiation protocol, supported by Apache?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the support of alternate data formats at the same URL part of the standard HTTP content negotiation protocol, supported by Apache?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyZine.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MyZine.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 06:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think m.myzine.com is great idea than myzine.mobi&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;why I have to have another extension while I have already myzine.com so for us will go with either m.myzine.com or Auto-detection&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think m.myzine.com is great idea than myzine.mobi</p>
<p>why I have to have another extension while I have already myzine.com so for us will go with either m.myzine.com or Auto-detection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;With regard to using a dot in front of the domain - for ANY purpose, I get the sense that an &quot;area code&quot; has been added. This is not as simple as using an ending (mTld such as .mobi) which tells me exactly what I am getting.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to using a dot in front of the domain &#8211; for ANY purpose, I get the sense that an &#8220;area code&#8221; has been added. This is not as simple as using an ending (mTld such as .mobi) which tells me exactly what I am getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Venkatraman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Venkatraman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 13:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/m-dot-webs-answer-to-mobile/#comment-170342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;m.domain.com is a good strategy compared to .mobi domain names for few reasons:
1) The Current domain owners of .com don&#039;t have to register a new .mobi or buy the domain in the secondary market.
(Especially true for owners of generic .com owners).
2) The subdomains could be used by prefixing m.  example one could use
m.subdomain.name.com
3) mobi.name.com , mobile.name.com, wa.name.com or any other mobilesubdomain.name.com can be redirected to m.name.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only person gaining from promoting .mobi initiative is the dotMobi promoters and the speculators who are able to flip the generic .mobi for quick gains.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m.domain.com is a good strategy compared to .mobi domain names for few reasons:<br />
1) The Current domain owners of .com don&#8217;t have to register a new .mobi or buy the domain in the secondary market.<br />
(Especially true for owners of generic .com owners).<br />
2) The subdomains could be used by prefixing m.  example one could use<br />
m.subdomain.name.com<br />
3) mobi.name.com , mobile.name.com, wa.name.com or any other mobilesubdomain.name.com can be redirected to m.name.com</p>
<p>The only person gaining from promoting .mobi initiative is the dotMobi promoters and the speculators who are able to flip the generic .mobi for quick gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
