<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microhoo &#8211; The much ballyhooed talks are off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kapustka</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/#comment-169654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Kapustka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 04:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/#comment-169654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Has Microsoft ever made a big acquisition that worked? Or was worth it?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Microsoft ever made a big acquisition that worked? Or was worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/#comment-169656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Hunkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 04:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/#comment-169656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I think if you look at all of recent moves by Google, it shows it wants to be Yahoo&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A simply excellent point.   However I&#039;m skeptical that MS is not interested in a Yahoo aquisition.  As you note Yahoo&#039;s got BIG potential, and MS desparately needs more ... potential.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I think if you look at all of recent moves by Google, it shows it wants to be Yahoo</i></p>
<p>A simply excellent point.   However I&#8217;m skeptical that MS is not interested in a Yahoo aquisition.  As you note Yahoo&#8217;s got BIG potential, and MS desparately needs more &#8230; potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fo.unta.in</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/#comment-169655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fo.unta.in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/microhoo-much-ballyhooed-talks-are-off/#comment-169655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I posted this before -think the comment was lost&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What will happen to the 18 percent jump in yahoo stock now? crazy ppl.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted this before -think the comment was lost</p>
<p>What will happen to the 18 percent jump in yahoo stock now? crazy ppl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
