<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch&#8217;s Dow Jones Bid, sign of a content bull market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RandomThoughts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99641</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99641</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jim Cramer said this morning that he advised Rupert about 10 years ago on a Dow Jones buyout and he thought Rupert would go as high as $100.  Cramer also said that he was sure that Rupert would get Dow Jones because what Rupert wants, he gets.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Course, he didn't get Dow Jones 10 years ago, so who knows.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Cramer said this morning that he advised Rupert about 10 years ago on a Dow Jones buyout and he thought Rupert would go as high as $100.  Cramer also said that he was sure that Rupert would get Dow Jones because what Rupert wants, he gets.</p>
<p>Course, he didn&#8217;t get Dow Jones 10 years ago, so who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morsa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99638</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Morsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om...yep; should he be able to pull this off, he'll gain prime content AND a great business/news gathering machine to feed his new financial channel.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rupert knows exactly what's he doing; and why he's doing it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just goes to show that--in the right hands--content really is (still) king.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WSJ TV? Talk about instant biz-cred.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om&#8230;yep; should he be able to pull this off, he&#8217;ll gain prime content AND a great business/news gathering machine to feed his new financial channel.</p>
<p>Rupert knows exactly what&#8217;s he doing; and why he&#8217;s doing it.</p>
<p>Just goes to show that&#8211;in the right hands&#8211;content really is (still) king.</p>
<p>WSJ TV? Talk about instant biz-cred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Gannes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99635</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Gannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 07:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure Murdoch has a business agenda.
The WSJ is also one heckuva political platform,&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Murdoch has a business agenda.<br />
The WSJ is also one heckuva political platform,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99625</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Moshe&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am not sure if it is the ego factor with Murdoch. He can already elect presidents and he can do whatever he feels like. This is a plain old business decision - buy an asset that he perceives a cheap. Imagine, FOX buiness channel renamed: WSJ TV. More appeal than CNBC!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moshe</p>
<p>I am not sure if it is the ego factor with Murdoch. He can already elect presidents and he can do whatever he feels like. This is a plain old business decision - buy an asset that he perceives a cheap. Imagine, FOX buiness channel renamed: WSJ TV. More appeal than CNBC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe Maeir</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99629</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe Maeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99629</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om, I think you are forgetting the "ego factor" in buying a newspaper, TV station. Yes, they are hard nosed businessman, but they are also willing to pay a premium to be able to say - I own the WSJ, or I own Time magazine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Owning a major media company also gives these businessman the political clout that they love. This is less of a factor in the states, but very big in the rest of the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, I think you are forgetting the &#8220;ego factor&#8221; in buying a newspaper, TV station. Yes, they are hard nosed businessman, but they are also willing to pay a premium to be able to say - I own the WSJ, or I own Time magazine.</p>
<p>Owning a major media company also gives these businessman the political clout that they love. This is less of a factor in the states, but very big in the rest of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomThoughts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99627</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 03:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99627</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, News Corp is missing the print side of their media empire.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, News Corp is missing the print side of their media empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99607</link>
		<dc:creator>KR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99607</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i was reading in the san jose merc yesterday http://www.mercurynews.com/businessheadlines/ci_5790894?nclick_check=1 that subscriptions of print news properties in general are declining.  the wall street journal was up .6%.  i am curious why murdoch would be so aggressive on going after dow jones.  although, at the same time, many analysts do believe that the family-owned wsj is underperforming.  i guess when you want to rule the world, owning an important news source like the wsj is part of the master plan.  add evil laughter here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was reading in the san jose merc yesterday <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/businessheadlines/ci_5790894?nclick_check=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.mercurynews.com/businessheadlines/ci_5790894?nclick_check=1</a> that subscriptions of print news properties in general are declining.  the wall street journal was up .6%.  i am curious why murdoch would be so aggressive on going after dow jones.  although, at the same time, many analysts do believe that the family-owned wsj is underperforming.  i guess when you want to rule the world, owning an important news source like the wsj is part of the master plan.  add evil laughter here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamla bhatt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99610</link>
		<dc:creator>kamla bhatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99610</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently the family that owns a good portion of the WSJ has declined the initial unsolicited bid from Mr. Murdoch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kamla&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the family that owns a good portion of the WSJ has declined the initial unsolicited bid from Mr. Murdoch.</p>
<p>Kamla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomThoughts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99632</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/murdochs-dow-jones-bid-sign-of-a-content-bull-market/#comment-99632</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;$60 was bold, but the family still has to agree to sell.  Wish I had bought some options on Dow Jones yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$60 was bold, but the family still has to agree to sell.  Wish I had bought some options on Dow Jones yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
