Why will e-book readers succeed? Not because e-books are good replacements for paper books — but because they’re good complements to paper books and documents, especially for work-related reading rather than pure pleasure.
Time and again we see that technology doesn’t have to mean an end to the old ways of doing things. Tech tools allow us to do things in different ways or to do things we couldn’t possibly do before, adding new value to our lives, not just reproducing value we could already access. The computer never made offices paperless; in fact, it led to more paper output. Online personal information management apps don’t make paper to do lists obsolete. Sticky notes still have value in a digital world.
ComputerWorld argues that e-books are bound to fail because they “are not, and cannot be, superior to what they are designed to replace.”
People who care enough about books to spend $25 billion on them each year tend to love books and everything about them. They love the look and feel of books. They like touching the paper, and looking at words and illustrations at a resolution no e-book will ever match. They view “curling up with a good book” as an escape from the electronic screens they look at all day. They love to carry them, annotate them, and give them as gifts. Book collecting is one of the biggest hobbies in the world.
We won’t stop doing that. But paper books and electronic books and book readers can exist alongside each other, with overlapping but not identical use cases. E-books don’t have to succeed on the criteria defined by paper books.
I love to own books because I find the best way to really absorb their content is to mark them up, write notes in the margins, fold over pages, then refer back to them when I recall something interesting or useful from them. I wish, though, that I could easily get information out of them and into my electronic store of ideas, my “memex.”
Right now, to get interesting ideas out of paper books into an electronic searchable format requires scanning with OCR or typing it in. If you’re willing to take on that labor, there are ways of making these snippets searchable. It’d be so much nicer if we would get an electronic version of a book when we purchase the paper copy and then could easily transfer our favorite chunks into our personal idea stores.
There are other reasons e-books and e-book readers may have value even in a world where paper books don’t become obsolete. Students could benefit from electronic textbooks, carrying the equivalent of a backpack full of books in a small tablet. Knowledge workers might prefer to read technical articles or lengthy professional documents on an easy to read, lightweight reader rather than printing them out and carrying them. Imagine taking hundred-page spec documents onto a plane with you just by carrying a reader loaded with them, and being able to search them electronically instead of using a table of contents or index. Service people could carry readers loaded with installation and repair manuals.
You can’t take an e-book reader into the bath tub with you, but so what? There’s room in the world for electronic and paper books.
I checked out the Sony Reader this weekend, and was quite impressed.
As long a manufacturers make products this good, then e-Books will succeed just fine. I’m seriously considering the Sony Reader, as long as I can make it work with my Mac (it’s not officially supported).
I care a lot about paper books, but I don’t spend anywhere *near* $25 billion on them. *Maybe* $1 billion, but that’s my limit.
Seriously, though, I think e-books rock, and love a well-written and well-designed ebook. They won’t replace a paper book, but there’s room for both.
Enjoyed reading your post.
For everyone’s info we at Bookyards have compiled over 500 free online libraries, broken into categories for simple viewing. The link is at http://www.bookyards.com/links.html?category_id=1780
There is more then enough reading there to keep one busy for years.
Looking for free stories on the web? Drop by my site and read my sci-fi novel Starstrikers now being serialized or read my first draft of a mystery novel Null_Pointer set in IT. Lots of creative stuff out there if you look around.
With the adjustible print size, think of the implications for the visually challenged readers who don’t have a good book as an option. There are over 20 million readers in America alone who have significantly reduced vision because of glaucoma, macral degeneration, diabetes related loss of vision, failed lens implants and a few hundred other causes. eBooks can give a big majority of those 20 million challenged readers an opportunity to curl up with an eBook if they do succeed.
[...] WebWorkerDaily: Why E-Books will succeed [...]
I absolutely love it when free e-books are available for books I own. There’s nothing quite like being able to do a full text search to find that exact passage that you want to quote.
I wrote the column you referenced, “Why e-books are bound to fail,” and discovered your blog entry while looking for productivity ideas. I have no counter-argument for you. I made my argument and you made yours (which was super constructive, well thought out and well written, and I appreciate that).
I just wanted to thank you for that, and also compliment you on a fantastic blog. I’m going to become a regular here.
Mike Elgan
Computerworld
I agree that ebooks aren’t meant to replace paper books in the way that DVDs have replaced VHS tapes. But ebook technology has been around for a number of years and has failed to catch on with the public.
So you have a chicken and egg problem. While publishers are resistant to putting much of their catalog online for lack of demand or fear of piracy, readers aren’t likely to invest in eBook reading devices if there’s not content they’re interested in. Until these issues are resolved, I think the eBook market’s growth will stay stunted for a while.
[...] Why E-Books Will Succeed – A rathional response to Computerworld from Web Worker Daily [via MobileRead] [...]