Comments on: Does 3Com Have what Vonage Needs? http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Jake http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-142318 Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:59:41 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-142318 Vonage testified that Net2phone had what they needed. Vonage should just go to Net2phone if they can find them.

]]> By: Sramana Mitra on Strategy http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-142316 Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:15:39 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-142316 Sudden Windfall For 3Com?…

An interesting Patent infringement situation seems to be brewing, with Verizon suing Vonage for some fundamental Voice-Over-IP intellectual property violation, and then a former US Robotics engineer, Michael Musiel, who wrote another patent on similar …

]]> By: RandomThoughts http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-142317 Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:42:51 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-142317 Pretty interesting. So maybe 3Com would figure they have $58 million coming to them?

Don’t see how this really helps Vonage unless 3Com would step in and tell Vonage “don’t worry about it, keep the $58 mil.”

]]>