<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does 3Com Have what Vonage Needs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-97258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-97258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Vonage testified that Net2phone had what they needed. Vonage should just go to Net2phone if they can find them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vonage testified that Net2phone had what they needed. Vonage should just go to Net2phone if they can find them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sramana Mitra on Strategy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-97253</link>
		<dc:creator>Sramana Mitra on Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-97253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sudden Windfall For 3Com?...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An interesting Patent infringement situation seems to be brewing, with Verizon suing Vonage for some fundamental Voice-Over-IP intellectual property violation, and then a former US Robotics engineer, Michael Musiel, who wrote another patent on similar ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sudden Windfall For 3Com?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>An interesting Patent infringement situation seems to be brewing, with Verizon suing Vonage for some fundamental Voice-Over-IP intellectual property violation, and then a former US Robotics engineer, Michael Musiel, who wrote another patent on similar &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomThoughts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-97256</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/does-3com-have-what-vonage-needs/#comment-97256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty interesting.  So maybe 3Com would figure they have $58 million coming to them?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don't see how this really helps Vonage unless 3Com would step in and tell Vonage "don't worry about it, keep the $58 mil."&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty interesting.  So maybe 3Com would figure they have $58 million coming to them?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t see how this really helps Vonage unless 3Com would step in and tell Vonage &#8220;don&#8217;t worry about it, keep the $58 mil.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
