<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google phone rumor, end of 2007?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Another Day, Another GPhone Rumor &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-476813</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM Another Day, Another GPhone Rumor &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-476813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] by Om Malik  Friday, August 24, 2007 at 7:26 AM PT &#124; No comments    Given the regularity with which the Google Phone related rumors show up in the media, it is clear that people want Google to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Om Malik  Friday, August 24, 2007 at 7:26 AM PT | No comments    Given the regularity with which the Google Phone related rumors show up in the media, it is clear that people want Google to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96867</link>
		<dc:creator>pake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Goog's got guys like Andy Rubin (Danger, WebTV, General Magic, Apple) working on the phone.  Assuming Goog's letting Andy's team do their thing, it'll be a good consumer device.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goog&#8217;s got guys like Andy Rubin (Danger, WebTV, General Magic, Apple) working on the phone.  Assuming Goog&#8217;s letting Andy&#8217;s team do their thing, it&#8217;ll be a good consumer device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96866</link>
		<dc:creator>pwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure I would be all that optimistic about Google's consumer electronic design prowess.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I would be all that optimistic about Google&#8217;s consumer electronic design prowess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96865</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I understand what Apple is bringing to the mobile phone market: The Apple experience. Better UI, better features, Apple product appeal. What are the core values at Google that they're going to bring to this market that are so compelling? I don't get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what Apple is bringing to the mobile phone market: The Apple experience. Better UI, better features, Apple product appeal. What are the core values at Google that they&#8217;re going to bring to this market that are so compelling? I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96864</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/google-phone-rumor-end-of-2007/#comment-96864</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not understanding the appeal of either phone. My T-Mobile MDA can already play MP3s, videos, and use Google Maps and has a Gmail client.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course I could be terribly wrong. The RAZR from Motorola is a crap phone, but the form factor made it worth buying, whereas I didn't like the RF, the UI and other things.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'll wait and see - the question is if Google is releasing phones with their branding, are they selling them from a particular vendor or are they going to go and try being a MVNO?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not understanding the appeal of either phone. My T-Mobile MDA can already play MP3s, videos, and use Google Maps and has a Gmail client.</p>
<p>Of course I could be terribly wrong. The RAZR from Motorola is a crap phone, but the form factor made it worth buying, whereas I didn&#8217;t like the RF, the UI and other things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wait and see - the question is if Google is releasing phones with their branding, are they selling them from a particular vendor or are they going to go and try being a MVNO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
