<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple shifted coders to iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Will iPhone spark wireless wars?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Will iPhone spark wireless wars?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] pull ahead of its rivals by riding the iPhone express. AT&amp;T and Apple are going to be launching a big media blitz to promote the iPhone, and according to UBS Research, it will be a major reason why AT&amp;T will be able to add [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pull ahead of its rivals by riding the iPhone express. AT&amp;T and Apple are going to be launching a big media blitz to promote the iPhone, and according to UBS Research, it will be a major reason why AT&amp;T will be able to add [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.T.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.T.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;desktop school is merely poor substrate for embedded programmers, and everybody in this industry knows that adding pregnant women doesn&#039;t make labor closer in time, so I wonder why Apple so lame in excuses, and why you actually call it not-a-Vista-joke, huh?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>desktop school is merely poor substrate for embedded programmers, and everybody in this industry knows that adding pregnant women doesn&#8217;t make labor closer in time, so I wonder why Apple so lame in excuses, and why you actually call it not-a-Vista-joke, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-04-14 : Blogging The News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2007-04-14 : Blogging The News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] GigaOM » Why Apple shifted coders to iPhone Om Malik revient sur la nécessité pour Apple &#8220;d&#8217;assurer un max&#8221; sur l&#8217;iPhone &#8230; d&#8217;où le retard annoncé de Leopard [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOM » Why Apple shifted coders to iPhone Om Malik revient sur la nécessité pour Apple &#8220;d&#8217;assurer un max&#8221; sur l&#8217;iPhone &#8230; d&#8217;où le retard annoncé de Leopard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [MacStansbury]</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[[MacStansbury]]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dashes on Leopard...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A few random thoughts concerning the next version of Mac OS X...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dashes on Leopard&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A few random thoughts concerning the next version of Mac OS X&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Woody</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Woody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;When OS X &quot;Leopard&quot; slips to January of 2010, then I&#039;ll stop making Vista slip jokes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Granted Microsoft never technically &quot;slipped&quot; because, well, they never promised anything to anyone at all--even right up to the end--it was pretty clear that Microsoft was hinting that Longhorn would be ready for a 2004 release way back in 2003. Further, when Gartner publically said in 2004 that Microsoft&#039;s Longhorn (later Vista) release wouldn&#039;t happen until 2007, Microsoft bitch-slapped Gartner pretty hard. So while technically no release date was officially announced, it was pretty clear that Microsoft intended to get Vista out the door no later than 2005--then slipped somewhere between two and three years.)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When OS X &#8220;Leopard&#8221; slips to January of 2010, then I&#8217;ll stop making Vista slip jokes.</p>
<p>(Granted Microsoft never technically &#8220;slipped&#8221; because, well, they never promised anything to anyone at all&#8211;even right up to the end&#8211;it was pretty clear that Microsoft was hinting that Longhorn would be ready for a 2004 release way back in 2003. Further, when Gartner publically said in 2004 that Microsoft&#8217;s Longhorn (later Vista) release wouldn&#8217;t happen until 2007, Microsoft bitch-slapped Gartner pretty hard. So while technically no release date was officially announced, it was pretty clear that Microsoft intended to get Vista out the door no later than 2005&#8211;then slipped somewhere between two and three years.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-04-13 at 80 dash 89 dot com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2007-04-13 at 80 dash 89 dot com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Why Apple shifted coders to iPhone (tags: iPhone Leopard) [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Apple shifted coders to iPhone (tags: iPhone Leopard) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I should apologize, I didn&#039;t mean to say that OS X was being delayed by 6 months.  I meant to say that it&#039;s ship date was now almost 6 months out, rather than one month out.  Even that was wrong though (I was thinking WWDC was in May).  The ship date was almost 2 months out, now it&#039;s almost 6 months out.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should apologize, I didn&#8217;t mean to say that OS X was being delayed by 6 months.  I meant to say that it&#8217;s ship date was now almost 6 months out, rather than one month out.  Even that was wrong though (I was thinking WWDC was in May).  The ship date was almost 2 months out, now it&#8217;s almost 6 months out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The rabid apple fans who are taking so much umbrage at Om&#039;s last sentence should be reminded that first, Vista wasn&#039;t postponed by 5 years, it came out 5 years after XP.  More importantly, it didn&#039;t slip all at once.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do find this all very intriguing though.  The next version of OSX was supposed to ship in about a month.  Realocating engineers to iPhone for two months now appearantly means that it&#039;s going to be delayed almost 6 months, which seems to be quite a disparity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that they are using the iPhone to cover for other delays in the project.  I also wonder about the relative sizes of the engineering teams devoted to the two projects, and of course there are general software engineering productivity issues too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reallocated engineers will have to wrap up existing projects so they can come back to them in a few months, then they&#039;ll have to ramp up on their new iPhone projects.  Once those are done, they have to ramp back up on their OS X work.  In between there are summer vacations to deal with.  And of course you have mythical-man-month issues from throwing new bodies at a late stage project.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rabid apple fans who are taking so much umbrage at Om&#8217;s last sentence should be reminded that first, Vista wasn&#8217;t postponed by 5 years, it came out 5 years after XP.  More importantly, it didn&#8217;t slip all at once.</p>
<p>I do find this all very intriguing though.  The next version of OSX was supposed to ship in about a month.  Realocating engineers to iPhone for two months now appearantly means that it&#8217;s going to be delayed almost 6 months, which seems to be quite a disparity.</p>
<p>It seems to me that they are using the iPhone to cover for other delays in the project.  I also wonder about the relative sizes of the engineering teams devoted to the two projects, and of course there are general software engineering productivity issues too.</p>
<p>The reallocated engineers will have to wrap up existing projects so they can come back to them in a few months, then they&#8217;ll have to ramp up on their new iPhone projects.  Once those are done, they have to ramp back up on their OS X work.  In between there are summer vacations to deal with.  And of course you have mythical-man-month issues from throwing new bodies at a late stage project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-04-13 at 80 dash 89 dot com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2007-04-13 at 80 dash 89 dot com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Why Apple shifted coders to iPhone (tags: iPhone Leopard)          Search [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Apple shifted coders to iPhone (tags: iPhone Leopard)          Search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/why-apple-shifted-coders-to-iphone/#comment-141466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;...PS: This delay should stop those Vista-delay jokes, because those who live in glass houses don’t throw stones.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vista was delayed for years ( plural ) and it&#039;s still awful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At least when Apple has a delay of a few months its for a publicly stated reason.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;PS: This delay should stop those Vista-delay jokes, because those who live in glass houses don’t throw stones.&#8221;</p>
<p>Vista was delayed for years ( plural ) and it&#8217;s still awful.</p>
<p>At least when Apple has a delay of a few months its for a publicly stated reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
