<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Akamai goes P2P, buys Red Swoosh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Whatever Happened to Red Swoosh? &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-876619</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever Happened to Red Swoosh? &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-876619</guid>
		<description>[...] Happened to Red&#160;Swoosh?  Remember Red Swoosh, the P2P company that was bought by Akamai for $18.7 million in April 2007? Red Swoosh used to be a competitor to Akamai, albeit on a much smaller scale, offering P2P-powered [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Happened to Red&nbsp;Swoosh?  Remember Red Swoosh, the P2P company that was bought by Akamai for $18.7 million in April 2007? Red Swoosh used to be a competitor to Akamai, albeit on a much smaller scale, offering P2P-powered [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2P, Streaming and CDNs: What Will Really Work? &#171; Backkom&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-862301</link>
		<dc:creator>P2P, Streaming and CDNs: What Will Really Work? &#171; Backkom&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-862301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] CacheLogic, it means more flexibility and cheaper pricing for content providers. Akamai last month bought its own P2P play, RedSwoosh. And how do BitTorrent and upstart Neokast fit into the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CacheLogic, it means more flexibility and cheaper pricing for content providers. Akamai last month bought its own P2P play, RedSwoosh. And how do BitTorrent and upstart Neokast fit into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ideablog &#187; Архив блога &#187; Все сделки 2007 г. в области web/technology на западном рынке</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-852727</link>
		<dc:creator>ideablog &#187; Архив блога &#187; Все сделки 2007 г. в области web/technology на западном рынке</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-852727</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] и дистрибьюции медийных файлов. Пресс-релиз &#124; TechCrunch &#124; GigaOm &#124; DMW [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] и дистрибьюции медийных файлов. Пресс-релиз | TechCrunch | GigaOm | DMW [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; 10 nejpirátěnějších filmů a TV show</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-831147</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; 10 nejpirátěnějších filmů a TV show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-831147</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] P2P sítí pro byznys svědčí uplynulý rok, který NewTeeVee označila za rok P2P CDN. Akamai koupilo Red Swoosh, BitTorrent předvedl své DNA streaming řešení, Pando získalo smouvu s NBC pro distribuci show [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P2P sítí pro byznys svědčí uplynulý rok, který NewTeeVee označila za rok P2P CDN. Akamai koupilo Red Swoosh, BitTorrent předvedl své DNA streaming řešení, Pando získalo smouvu s NBC pro distribuci show [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-824075</link>
		<dc:creator>Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-824075</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] technology for the management and distribution of media files. Press Release &#124; TechCrunch &#124;  GigaOm &#124;  DMW [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology for the management and distribution of media files. Press Release | TechCrunch |  GigaOm |  DMW [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NTV Rant: P2P Is More than Cheap Bandwidth - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-810524</link>
		<dc:creator>NTV Rant: P2P Is More than Cheap Bandwidth - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-810524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] December 28, 2007 at 3:01 AM PT Comments (0)   2007 has been the year of the P2P CDNs. Akamai bought Red Swoosh, BitTorrent started to showcase their DNA streaming solution, and Pando inked a deal with NBC to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December 28, 2007 at 3:01 AM PT Comments (0)   2007 has been the year of the P2P CDNs. Akamai bought Red Swoosh, BitTorrent started to showcase their DNA streaming solution, and Pando inked a deal with NBC to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rant: P2P Is More than Cheap Bandwidth &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-810520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rant: P2P Is More than Cheap Bandwidth &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-810520</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] P2P Is More than Cheap&#160;Bandwidth 2007 has been the year of the P2P CDNs. Akamai bought Red Swoosh, BitTorrent started to showcase their DNA streaming solution, and Pando inked a deal with NBC to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P2P Is More than Cheap&nbsp;Bandwidth 2007 has been the year of the P2P CDNs. Akamai bought Red Swoosh, BitTorrent started to showcase their DNA streaming solution, and Pando inked a deal with NBC to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Akamai &#38; the CDN Price Wars &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-424857</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM Akamai &#38; the CDN Price Wars &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 05:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-424857</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] video. The good news is that Akamai&#8217;s management knows that, and bought Nine Systems and Red Swoosh to address those opportunities. The bad news is that some of its basic CDN customers, for example, Move [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] video. The good news is that Akamai&#8217;s management knows that, and bought Nine Systems and Red Swoosh to address those opportunities. The bad news is that some of its basic CDN customers, for example, Move [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104148</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What features will make p2p content delivery, especially streaming media such as video, main stream?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some thoughts that I have pondered over. In my oppinion for a p2p system to become widely accepted and used it has to show some specific characteristics. Below are some end-user centric thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-End-users have to get used to and comfortable with the idea of sharing bandwidth.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-They have be certain that the p2p software do not compromise their security nor integrity. Doing like some solutions which installs a software and automatically configures it to run 24/7 on the client computer sharing media is simply not the way to get trust. I belive that by default users should not have to share more that the material they download and at the instance when they download it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Simple installation! This is a key feature, if the installation process is complicated people will not use it. It's as simple as that. 3-4 clicks should be the maximum.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-OS agnostic. The p2p system should work on all major platforms and on all major media players. Wether the end-user uses Linux, Mac or Windows it should work seamless.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Browser agnostic. The plugins for the p2p  system should work for all major browsers; IE, firefox, safari, opera, it should make any difference.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-The p2p system should work with all major media players such as; windows media player, quicktime, flash and real player.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-It should be based on open standards, no walled gardens making it impossible for users (not end-users) to change system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What do you guys think?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What features will make p2p content delivery, especially streaming media such as video, main stream?</p>
<p>Some thoughts that I have pondered over. In my oppinion for a p2p system to become widely accepted and used it has to show some specific characteristics. Below are some end-user centric thoughts.</p>
<p>-End-users have to get used to and comfortable with the idea of sharing bandwidth.</p>
<p>-They have be certain that the p2p software do not compromise their security nor integrity. Doing like some solutions which installs a software and automatically configures it to run 24/7 on the client computer sharing media is simply not the way to get trust. I belive that by default users should not have to share more that the material they download and at the instance when they download it.</p>
<p>-Simple installation! This is a key feature, if the installation process is complicated people will not use it. It&#8217;s as simple as that. 3-4 clicks should be the maximum.</p>
<p>-OS agnostic. The p2p system should work on all major platforms and on all major media players. Wether the end-user uses Linux, Mac or Windows it should work seamless.</p>
<p>-Browser agnostic. The plugins for the p2p  system should work for all major browsers; IE, firefox, safari, opera, it should make any difference.</p>
<p>-The p2p system should work with all major media players such as; windows media player, quicktime, flash and real player.</p>
<p>-It should be based on open standards, no walled gardens making it impossible for users (not end-users) to change system.</p>
<p>-&#8230;</p>
<p>What do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RazorSharp iPods &#38; Raw Gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Payday for Red Swoosh: $15 million from Akamai</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104147</link>
		<dc:creator>RazorSharp iPods &#38; Raw Gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Payday for Red Swoosh: $15 million from Akamai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 06:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104147</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] has acquired Red Swoosh for $15 million in a stock for stock transaction. We covered Red Swoosh last year when they launched a free, ad [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has acquired Red Swoosh for $15 million in a stock for stock transaction. We covered Red Swoosh last year when they launched a free, ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104146</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104146</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The deal defintely is strategic and signifies two things&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) P2P will play a significant role in CDNs to lower the costs for delivery high quality videos and streaming live events.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2) The $15 Million price tag also says that P2P CDNs will not be mainstream anytime sooner, and hence low revenues for the next 2-3 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deal defintely is strategic and signifies two things</p>
<p>1) P2P will play a significant role in CDNs to lower the costs for delivery high quality videos and streaming live events.</p>
<p>2) The $15 Million price tag also says that P2P CDNs will not be mainstream anytime sooner, and hence low revenues for the next 2-3 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; P2P, now for Pretty Much Everything</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104145</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; P2P, now for Pretty Much Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104145</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Over the years, P2P has found many legitimate uses and has found a way into everyday life. Why&#8230; even Akamai, which had scoffed at P2P, decided to acquire Red Swoosh. [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over the years, P2P has found many legitimate uses and has found a way into everyday life. Why&#8230; even Akamai, which had scoffed at P2P, decided to acquire Red Swoosh. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business and culture of disruption</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104144</link>
		<dc:creator>Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business and culture of disruption</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104144</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Newswatch 4.13.07: CEO of Yahoo target committed securities fraud...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What do you think of this news feature? Useful? Superfluous? Let us know in the comments. Want to see more headlines? Fewer? Should we include a blurb? This morning's news: Rivals.com CEO committed securities fraud: Yahoo deal killer? (TechCrunch) Net...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Newswatch 4.13.07: CEO of Yahoo target committed securities fraud&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>What do you think of this news feature? Useful? Superfluous? Let us know in the comments. Want to see more headlines? Fewer? Should we include a blurb? This morning&#8217;s news: Rivals.com CEO committed securities fraud: Yahoo deal killer? (TechCrunch) Net&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastien BORGET</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104143</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien BORGET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This news tends to prove that even giants like Akamai with strong CDN networks cannot compete against p2p delivery networks. So if you cannot beat them, join (buy...) them !&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To another extent, this news is very good and confirm the efforts from my company to evangelize P2P and provide P2P Content Delivery solutions: peer-to-peer is now seriously considered as the main architecture when companies develop their online video distribution portal, while client-servers architecture are deprecated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And of course it is not limited to video contents: you can use p2p content delivery networks for music, pictures, work documents, zip archives, programs ...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sebastien
http://www.1-click.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This news tends to prove that even giants like Akamai with strong CDN networks cannot compete against p2p delivery networks. So if you cannot beat them, join (buy&#8230;) them !</p>
<p>To another extent, this news is very good and confirm the efforts from my company to evangelize P2P and provide P2P Content Delivery solutions: peer-to-peer is now seriously considered as the main architecture when companies develop their online video distribution portal, while client-servers architecture are deprecated.</p>
<p>And of course it is not limited to video contents: you can use p2p content delivery networks for music, pictures, work documents, zip archives, programs &#8230;</p>
<p>Sebastien<br />
<a href="http://www.1-click.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-click.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multimedias.mobi &#187; Payday for Red Swoosh: $15 million from Akamai</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104142</link>
		<dc:creator>Multimedias.mobi &#187; Payday for Red Swoosh: $15 million from Akamai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 04:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104142</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] has acquired Red Swoosh for $15 million in a stock for stock transaction. We covered Red Swoosh last year when they launched a free, ad [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has acquired Red Swoosh for $15 million in a stock for stock transaction. We covered Red Swoosh last year when they launched a free, ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hosting 2.0 report</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104141</link>
		<dc:creator>hosting 2.0 report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/akamai-goes-p2p-buys-red-swoosh/#comment-104141</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is That Where RedSwoosh's $15 Million Valuation Came From?...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On June 27, 2001, CNet ran an article on Kontiki and Red Swoosh. Giga Information Group analyst Joel Yaffe panned the stealth-mode startups' P2P plans: individual Internet-connected PCs are so unpredictable; they would put content publishers in a prec...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is That Where RedSwoosh&#8217;s $15 Million Valuation Came From?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>On June 27, 2001, CNet ran an article on Kontiki and Red Swoosh. Giga Information Group analyst Joel Yaffe panned the stealth-mode startups&#8217; P2P plans: individual Internet-connected PCs are so unpredictable; they would put content publishers in a prec&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
