<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of Broadband 2006: DSL rules for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-731658</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-731658</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;DSL will always rule in the high speed industry.  Its cheap and more reliable than cable! http://nationwide-dsl.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DSL will always rule in the high speed industry.  Its cheap and more reliable than cable! <a href="http://nationwide-dsl.com" rel="nofollow">http://nationwide-dsl.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94556</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94556</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fiber to home is undoubtedly going to grow, but we must remember that broadband over power lines, satellites, and other forms of Wi-Fi like WiMAX are in development. It&#039;ll be interesting to see how these alternate forms of connection to high-speed internet will account for broadband growth.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://highspeed-internet-provider.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiber to home is undoubtedly going to grow, but we must remember that broadband over power lines, satellites, and other forms of Wi-Fi like WiMAX are in development. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how these alternate forms of connection to high-speed internet will account for broadband growth.</p>

<p><a href="http://highspeed-internet-provider.com" rel="nofollow">http://highspeed-internet-provider.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voipniche.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixed broadband is defining global user expectations for access</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94555</link>
		<dc:creator>voipniche.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixed broadband is defining global user expectations for access</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94555</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] post at GigaOM about the current state-of-play in broadband. 281m global subs - so I&#8217;d guess [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post at GigaOM about the current state-of-play in broadband. 281m global subs &#8211; so I&#8217;d guess [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94554</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94554</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting to see how DSL companies fare with this increased demand considering the pressures in pricing such as CNXT and BRCM have stated in their past couple of quarters especially in Asia and Europe. North American market continues to be bullish considering the gains on Cable. However, IPTV is too slow off the blocks here compared to Asia or Europe, so it will be an intriguing battle between price and features.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how DSL companies fare with this increased demand considering the pressures in pricing such as CNXT and BRCM have stated in their past couple of quarters especially in Asia and Europe. North American market continues to be bullish considering the gains on Cable. However, IPTV is too slow off the blocks here compared to Asia or Europe, so it will be an intriguing battle between price and features.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanH</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94552</link>
		<dc:creator>DanH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94552</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Homes with multiple HD TV sets will drive FTTx. There is no other way to effectively deliver the required bandwidth - period. IPTV will change it everything.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The carriers building FTTx such as Verizon will prove that the maintenance savings of an all fiber network compared to one with copper will eventually make the shareholders forget about the billions it cost to build.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homes with multiple HD TV sets will drive FTTx. There is no other way to effectively deliver the required bandwidth &#8211; period. IPTV will change it everything.</p>

<p>The carriers building FTTx such as Verizon will prove that the maintenance savings of an all fiber network compared to one with copper will eventually make the shareholders forget about the billions it cost to build.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maritza Stoewe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94553</link>
		<dc:creator>Maritza Stoewe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94553</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thankfully broadband has brought us sites like http://www.youtube.com and http://www.cavenger.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thankfully broadband has brought us sites like <a href="http://www.youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com</a> and <a href="http://www.cavenger.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cavenger.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. G.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94551</link>
		<dc:creator>P. G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/broadband-2006-dsl-vs-cable-vs-fiber/#comment-94551</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting to see how Fiber To Home (FTTH) technology gains the market share. As you mentioned, Verizon seems to have the lead right now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how Fiber To Home (FTTH) technology gains the market share. As you mentioned, Verizon seems to have the lead right now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
