<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOM &#171; vonage voip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOM &#171; vonage voip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMSteve and Angela discuss the ins and outs of the oldest Internet phone service. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMSteve and Angela discuss the ins and outs of the oldest Internet phone service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Information &#171; vonage voip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VoIP Information &#171; vonage voip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMI wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizons thumb of death. A few [] &#8230; [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMI wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizons thumb of death. A few [] &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; The Vonage &#38; VoIP Inc. deal mess</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; The Vonage &#38; VoIP Inc. deal mess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] I wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon&#8217;s thumb of death. A few [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon&#8217;s thumb of death. A few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; The Vonage &#38; VoIP Inc. deal mess</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-168738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; The Vonage &#38; VoIP Inc. deal mess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-168738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] I wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon&#8217;s thumb of death. A few [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon&#8217;s thumb of death. A few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think, unless you really know that this deal is for some sort of patent relief from Verizon, that you rethink this.  I saw that Daniel Connor stated that &quot;This agreement will help Vonage come out of two of the three Verizon patents that the former is said to have violated.&quot; in his Vonage Forum press digest. Just seems like too material of an issue to not have the facts right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, if, while reading the 8-K you also read the 10-K for that company, you many ask yourself why else would Vonage do business with them. Not a pretty read.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, unless you really know that this deal is for some sort of patent relief from Verizon, that you rethink this.  I saw that Daniel Connor stated that &#8220;This agreement will help Vonage come out of two of the three Verizon patents that the former is said to have violated.&#8221; in his Vonage Forum press digest. Just seems like too material of an issue to not have the facts right.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if, while reading the 8-K you also read the 10-K for that company, you many ask yourself why else would Vonage do business with them. Not a pretty read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Steve, I think you may want to stock up with both red and white wine because it appears that whether Vonage is roasted or toasted - this just might be a double fisted outcome.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I think you may want to stock up with both red and white wine because it appears that whether Vonage is roasted or toasted &#8211; this just might be a double fisted outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morsa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Morsa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yes; this move will help (a bit)...but it does nothing to address the other remaining Verizon patent...nor the likely many others sure to &quot;come out of the woodwork&quot; now that these early VoIP patent-owning innovators see that the court/s are willing to enforce such patents.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know whether roasted Vonage goes better with red...or white wine?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes; this move will help (a bit)&#8230;but it does nothing to address the other remaining Verizon patent&#8230;nor the likely many others sure to &#8220;come out of the woodwork&#8221; now that these early VoIP patent-owning innovators see that the court/s are willing to enforce such patents.</p>
<p>Does anyone know whether roasted Vonage goes better with red&#8230;or white wine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoper Bermingham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christoper Bermingham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Keep up the good fight Vonage!  Vonage has saved me a ton of money over the last few years.  Is it any wonder Verizon is so eager to shut down a low cost provider with a great product who lets you port your number?  Why provide a fair price for your service when you can just sue your competitor into the ground instead?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good fight Vonage!  Vonage has saved me a ton of money over the last few years.  Is it any wonder Verizon is so eager to shut down a low cost provider with a great product who lets you port your number?  Why provide a fair price for your service when you can just sue your competitor into the ground instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Gibbons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I wonder if Vonage&#039;s focus will now shift substantially from new customer acquisition to preservation of the existing base to maximize value in the event of a sale. No point spending a few hundred million more on finding new victims if everyone else is churning out the back door.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Vonage&#8217;s focus will now shift substantially from new customer acquisition to preservation of the existing base to maximize value in the event of a sale. No point spending a few hundred million more on finding new victims if everyone else is churning out the back door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now &#124; voip.thephonedog.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now &#124; voip.thephonedog.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] post by Om Malik and software by Elliott [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Om Malik and software by Elliott [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomThoughts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomThoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-140403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There is no doubt in my mind that Vonage auditors gave them &quot;the company&#039;s ability to continue in existence was in doubt&quot; opinion.  The next announcement concerning Vonage&#039;s annual report will be that they have had to change their auditors and it will take them another 3 to 6 months to file their annual report.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In that time, they will be looking to find a buyer.  Let the shareholder class action lawsuits begin.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt in my mind that Vonage auditors gave them &#8220;the company&#8217;s ability to continue in existence was in doubt&#8221; opinion.  The next announcement concerning Vonage&#8217;s annual report will be that they have had to change their auditors and it will take them another 3 to 6 months to file their annual report.</p>
<p>In that time, they will be looking to find a buyer.  Let the shareholder class action lawsuits begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

