<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOM &#171; vonage voip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-598988</link>
		<dc:creator>Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOM &#171; vonage voip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-598988</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMSteve and Angela discuss the ins and outs of the oldest Internet phone service. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMSteve and Angela discuss the ins and outs of the oldest Internet phone service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Information &#171; vonage voip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-590968</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Information &#171; vonage voip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-590968</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMI wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon’s thumb of death. A few […] &#8230; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now « GigaOMI wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon’s thumb of death. A few […] &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; The Vonage &#38; VoIP Inc. deal mess</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94354</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; The Vonage &#38; VoIP Inc. deal mess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94354</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon&#8217;s thumb of death. A few [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote about the Vonage-VoIP Inc., deal that seemed to be perfect for Vonage to get out from under Verizon&#8217;s thumb of death. A few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94353</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think, unless you really know that this deal is for some sort of patent relief from Verizon, that you rethink this.  I saw that Daniel Connor stated that "This agreement will help Vonage come out of two of the three Verizon patents that the former is said to have violated." in his Vonage Forum press digest. Just seems like too material of an issue to not have the facts right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, if, while reading the 8-K you also read the 10-K for that company, you many ask yourself why else would Vonage do business with them. Not a pretty read.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, unless you really know that this deal is for some sort of patent relief from Verizon, that you rethink this.  I saw that Daniel Connor stated that &#8220;This agreement will help Vonage come out of two of the three Verizon patents that the former is said to have violated.&#8221; in his Vonage Forum press digest. Just seems like too material of an issue to not have the facts right.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if, while reading the 8-K you also read the 10-K for that company, you many ask yourself why else would Vonage do business with them. Not a pretty read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94357</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Steve, I think you may want to stock up with both red and white wine because it appears that whether Vonage is roasted or toasted - this just might be a double fisted outcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I think you may want to stock up with both red and white wine because it appears that whether Vonage is roasted or toasted - this just might be a double fisted outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morsa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94360</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Morsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94360</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes; this move will help (a bit)...but it does nothing to address the other remaining Verizon patent...nor the likely many others sure to "come out of the woodwork" now that these early VoIP patent-owning innovators see that the court/s are willing to enforce such patents.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know whether roasted Vonage goes better with red...or white wine?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes; this move will help (a bit)&#8230;but it does nothing to address the other remaining Verizon patent&#8230;nor the likely many others sure to &#8220;come out of the woodwork&#8221; now that these early VoIP patent-owning innovators see that the court/s are willing to enforce such patents.</p>
<p>Does anyone know whether roasted Vonage goes better with red&#8230;or white wine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoper Bermingham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94358</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoper Bermingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94358</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Keep up the good fight Vonage!  Vonage has saved me a ton of money over the last few years.  Is it any wonder Verizon is so eager to shut down a low cost provider with a great product who lets you port your number?  Why provide a fair price for your service when you can just sue your competitor into the ground instead?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good fight Vonage!  Vonage has saved me a ton of money over the last few years.  Is it any wonder Verizon is so eager to shut down a low cost provider with a great product who lets you port your number?  Why provide a fair price for your service when you can just sue your competitor into the ground instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94356</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94356</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if Vonage's focus will now shift substantially from new customer acquisition to preservation of the existing base to maximize value in the event of a sale. No point spending a few hundred million more on finding new victims if everyone else is churning out the back door.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Vonage&#8217;s focus will now shift substantially from new customer acquisition to preservation of the existing base to maximize value in the event of a sale. No point spending a few hundred million more on finding new victims if everyone else is churning out the back door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now &#124; voip.thephonedog.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94359</link>
		<dc:creator>Vonage saved by VoIP Inc., for now &#124; voip.thephonedog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] post by Om Malik and software by Elliott [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Om Malik and software by Elliott [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomThoughts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94355</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/03/vonage-voip-inc/#comment-94355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is no doubt in my mind that Vonage auditors gave them "the company's ability to continue in existence was in doubt" opinion.  The next announcement concerning Vonage's annual report will be that they have had to change their auditors and it will take them another 3 to 6 months to file their annual report.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In that time, they will be looking to find a buyer.  Let the shareholder class action lawsuits begin.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt in my mind that Vonage auditors gave them &#8220;the company&#8217;s ability to continue in existence was in doubt&#8221; opinion.  The next announcement concerning Vonage&#8217;s annual report will be that they have had to change their auditors and it will take them another 3 to 6 months to file their annual report.</p>
<p>In that time, they will be looking to find a buyer.  Let the shareholder class action lawsuits begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
