<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMI &amp; Apple say no DRM for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pay More for DRM-Free Music at iTunes - Unsought Input</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94296</link>
		<dc:creator>Pay More for DRM-Free Music at iTunes - Unsought Input</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] one company is.  EMI and Apple reached a deal to allow totally restriction-free songs for sale.  The kicker is that the songs will cost 30 cents more that the locked-down DRM [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one company is.  EMI and Apple reached a deal to allow totally restriction-free songs for sale.  The kicker is that the songs will cost 30 cents more that the locked-down DRM [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee &#187; Could Video Escape DRM Too?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94297</link>
		<dc:creator>NewTeeVee &#187; Could Video Escape DRM Too?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] appears that the era of DRM-free music is upon us. We can&#8217;t help but hope that DRM-free TV shows and movies will follow, but of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appears that the era of DRM-free music is upon us. We can&#8217;t help but hope that DRM-free TV shows and movies will follow, but of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRM is not the issue</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94298</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM is not the issue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When all is said and done, interoperability needs to be at the center of this debate. Apple choosing to use the AAC format without DRM doesn&#039;t really make the music a whole lot more open to other devices. Currently, AAC is supported by Apple and Sony, but not most of the other popular MP3 players.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s push the focus away from DRM and towards the real roadblock, interoperability.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When all is said and done, interoperability needs to be at the center of this debate. Apple choosing to use the AAC format without DRM doesn&#8217;t really make the music a whole lot more open to other devices. Currently, AAC is supported by Apple and Sony, but not most of the other popular MP3 players.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s push the focus away from DRM and towards the real roadblock, interoperability.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Cool Hunting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple &#38; EMI drop DRM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94295</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Cool Hunting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple &#38; EMI drop DRM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] If this move by Apple and EMI becomes a success, subscription based services actually competing with iTunes such as Napster or Real will be in trouble, as they all require DRM. Also, this would make it easier for AAC (the codec Apple uses in iTunes) to become an standard together with MP3 and in detriment of Microsoft&#8217;s WMA. (All this ideas can be found in the comments at this GigaOm post). [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If this move by Apple and EMI becomes a success, subscription based services actually competing with iTunes such as Napster or Real will be in trouble, as they all require DRM. Also, this would make it easier for AAC (the codec Apple uses in iTunes) to become an standard together with MP3 and in detriment of Microsoft&#8217;s WMA. (All this ideas can be found in the comments at this GigaOm post). [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomThoughts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94294</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A more interesting test is of consumers.  Their claims of being treated like criminals will fall flat if consumers don’t buy the more expensive DRM free music.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more interesting test is of consumers.  Their claims of being treated like criminals will fall flat if consumers don’t buy the more expensive DRM free music.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waking Ideas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple Strikes a Deal: EMI&#8217;s entire catalog on iTunes is going DRM-free</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94290</link>
		<dc:creator>Waking Ideas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple Strikes a Deal: EMI&#8217;s entire catalog on iTunes is going DRM-free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]  Om Malik: Basically, now the other labels - Sony, BMG and Universal - have to embrace DRM free music or else have their hypocrisy exposed. If the other majors follow EMI’s lead, then Apple might have turned on the heat on some of its rivals say, Napster or Rhapsody, who would have to follow suit or else become monthly subscription services. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Om Malik: Basically, now the other labels &#8211; Sony, BMG and Universal &#8211; have to embrace DRM free music or else have their hypocrisy exposed. If the other majors follow EMI’s lead, then Apple might have turned on the heat on some of its rivals say, Napster or Rhapsody, who would have to follow suit or else become monthly subscription services. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94292</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;DRM-free is very important, but so is 256kbps. There is no way I&#039;m going to pay iTunes prices for 128 kbps quality. Still, I wish they had bit the bullet and gone all the way to 320 kbps (I guess this would be the limit as it&#039;s all the iPod will support).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DRM-free is very important, but so is 256kbps. There is no way I&#8217;m going to pay iTunes prices for 128 kbps quality. Still, I wish they had bit the bullet and gone all the way to 320 kbps (I guess this would be the limit as it&#8217;s all the iPod will support).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony C</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94293</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t see this as the end of subscription services; in fact, I don&#039;t know that it is even related.  Subscription allows unlimited streaming, which works well for people who like to listen from their laptops, or connect them to their stereos.  DRM-free songs don&#039;t make this concept any more or less attractive.  I don&#039;t see a sudden rush to e-mail out a personal catalog of DRM-free music to a group of friends, which would reduce one&#039;s incentive to hold a subscription, but I suppose that is one of the hypotheses that will be tested over the next year.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this as the end of subscription services; in fact, I don&#8217;t know that it is even related.  Subscription allows unlimited streaming, which works well for people who like to listen from their laptops, or connect them to their stereos.  DRM-free songs don&#8217;t make this concept any more or less attractive.  I don&#8217;t see a sudden rush to e-mail out a personal catalog of DRM-free music to a group of friends, which would reduce one&#8217;s incentive to hold a subscription, but I suppose that is one of the hypotheses that will be tested over the next year.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Laks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94288</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Laks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s about time.  Now if they could only figure out what to do with that pesky Limewire...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time.  Now if they could only figure out what to do with that pesky Limewire&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94291</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94291</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone want to speculate on the long term implications for digital video?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone want to speculate on the long term implications for digital video?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94289</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94289</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A huge leap for the credibility of digital music.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge leap for the credibility of digital music.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in Chapel Hill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94287</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in Chapel Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94287</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that albums will be priced the same for 128 kbps, DRM&#039;d or 256 kbps DRM-free will be a major catalyst for selling whole albums. Should be more profitable for both apple and emi since more money per transaction. This will also be a further enticement to bring other studios on board. Classic Apple to seduce the user into spending more money rather than demand it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that albums will be priced the same for 128 kbps, DRM&#8217;d or 256 kbps DRM-free will be a major catalyst for selling whole albums. Should be more profitable for both apple and emi since more money per transaction. This will also be a further enticement to bring other studios on board. Classic Apple to seduce the user into spending more money rather than demand it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94286</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also all of the indies are being offered the option and many will choose it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that it also gives Apple a differentiation for subscription if they ever choose to add that (they may not).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This also cements aac as a necessary default codec along with mp3 and probably kills wma.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lots of swearing coming from Redmond today...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also all of the indies are being offered the option and many will choose it.</p>

<p>Note that it also gives Apple a differentiation for subscription if they ever choose to add that (they may not).</p>

<p>This also cements aac as a necessary default codec along with mp3 and probably kills wma.</p>

<p>Lots of swearing coming from Redmond today&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94285</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The brilliant aspect of this deal is that all the labels just re-entered into a multi-year agreement to sell their songs on iTS at $0.99 per song. Jobs patiently waited for them to lock themselves in before springing his open letter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With this move, EMI is suddenly making much more profit per DRM-free song sold. The other labels now have to enter into new agreements with Apple or sit on the sidelines selling much less profitable DRM&#039;d songs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No wonder Jobs is confident that half the songs will be DRM-free by the end of the year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing is for sure - if this turns out to be the huge hit it appears it will be, then it will be the end of music subscription services since they all require DRM. Goodbye Napster, Real, and PlaysForSure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brilliant aspect of this deal is that all the labels just re-entered into a multi-year agreement to sell their songs on iTS at $0.99 per song. Jobs patiently waited for them to lock themselves in before springing his open letter.</p>

<p>With this move, EMI is suddenly making much more profit per DRM-free song sold. The other labels now have to enter into new agreements with Apple or sit on the sidelines selling much less profitable DRM&#8217;d songs.</p>

<p>No wonder Jobs is confident that half the songs will be DRM-free by the end of the year.</p>

<p>One thing is for sure &#8211; if this turns out to be the huge hit it appears it will be, then it will be the end of music subscription services since they all require DRM. Goodbye Napster, Real, and PlaysForSure.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, I got pwned: &quot;Maybe Mr.Nicoli should follow the same advice in the music industry first.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://gigaom.com/2007/03/28/emi-ceo-mobile-can-learn-from-apple/#comments&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I got pwned: &#8220;Maybe Mr.Nicoli should follow the same advice in the music industry first.&#8221;</p>

<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/28/emi-ceo-mobile-can-learn-from-apple/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2007/03/28/emi-ceo-mobile-can-learn-from-apple/#comments</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visible.Mobi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94284</link>
		<dc:creator>Visible.Mobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/apple-emi-say-no-to-drm/#comment-94284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great news!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
