<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optical gear targets 100 Gigabit speeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SC08 Video: Ciena Demo of 100-Gigabit Data Transfer - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-913788</link>
		<dc:creator>SC08 Video: Ciena Demo of 100-Gigabit Data Transfer - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-913788</guid>
		<description>[...] transfer demo that Ciena was showing off at SC 08 in Austin, Texas, today was very cool. Unlike previous demonstrations, Ciena&#8217;s was a 100-Gigabit data transfer over a single channel, rather than one aggregated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] transfer demo that Ciena was showing off at SC 08 in Austin, Texas, today was very cool. Unlike previous demonstrations, Ciena&#8217;s was a 100-Gigabit data transfer over a single channel, rather than one aggregated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solarflare Gets $26M for 10 GigE - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-884067</link>
		<dc:creator>Solarflare Gets $26M for 10 GigE - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-884067</guid>
		<description>[...] transport technology to move outside of the telecommunications networks, where companies such as Infinera are already pursuing 100 Gigabit Ethernet over fiber, and into mass adoption in the data center. Getting the technology into servers at a reasonable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] transport technology to move outside of the telecommunications networks, where companies such as Infinera are already pursuing 100 Gigabit Ethernet over fiber, and into mass adoption in the data center. Getting the technology into servers at a reasonable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Do You Know About&#8230;. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 100 Gigabit per second: Here it comes people</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-94160</link>
		<dc:creator>What Do You Know About&#8230;. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 100 Gigabit per second: Here it comes people</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-94160</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]  Full article - via GigaOM [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Full article - via GigaOM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDsBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Round Table</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-94159</link>
		<dc:creator>JDsBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Round Table</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-94159</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Gigabit speeds? That&#8217;s gigabit, not gigabyte [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigabit speeds? That&#8217;s gigabit, not gigabyte [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Blake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-94161</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/optical-networks-100-gigabits/#comment-94161</guid>
		<description>&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;VOD and long haul are completely un-related.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;VOD will drive growth at abut 4x to 5x, not 10x&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The HSSG of IEEE will develop a 100G basebad standard (if we are lucky and the 40G crowd doesn't sell the farm to save the roostr). That doesn't make for a 100G long haul standard. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Yes we need a long haul standard as well.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So what is the big obstacle. It's actually Sun Microsystems and the like who say that 100G is not needed (because they do not want to take the R&#38;D expense). OK we get it -- servers do not need 100G. It's also true that hard drives do not need to be 100G, but we clearly need 10G in the network today.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Victor&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>VOD and long haul are completely un-related.</li>
<li>VOD will drive growth at abut 4x to 5x, not 10x</li>
<li>The HSSG of IEEE will develop a 100G basebad standard (if we are lucky and the 40G crowd doesn&#8217;t sell the farm to save the roostr). That doesn&#8217;t make for a 100G long haul standard. </li>
<li>Yes we need a long haul standard as well.</li>
</ol>
<p>So what is the big obstacle. It&#8217;s actually Sun Microsystems and the like who say that 100G is not needed (because they do not want to take the R&amp;D expense). OK we get it &#8212; servers do not need 100G. It&#8217;s also true that hard drives do not need to be 100G, but we clearly need 10G in the network today.</p>
<p>-Victor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
