<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s big spending ways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mi otro blog&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google compra DoubleClick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94167</link>
		<dc:creator>Mi otro blog&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google compra DoubleClick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94167</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] sobre todo con los &#8220;grandes clientes&#8221; de esta empresa. Adicionalmente, con esta compra Google se ha adelantado a Microsoft, que también parecía estar interesado en adquirir [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sobre todo con los &#8220;grandes clientes&#8221; de esta empresa. Adicionalmente, con esta compra Google se ha adelantado a Microsoft, que también parecía estar interesado en adquirir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 苦牢之最後一年</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94166</link>
		<dc:creator>苦牢之最後一年</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94166</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google 購併 DoubleClick...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;M$ 在網路廣告應該出局了，Google 和 Yahoo! 還要再拼拼看&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;剛剛看到一則大新聞，說是 Google 花了大約 31 億美金 (約合 1000 億新台幣) 收購 DoubleClick，這裡則分別是兩家公司的新聞稿 (一、二...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google 購併 DoubleClick&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>M$ 在網路廣告應該出局了，Google 和 Yahoo! 還要再拼拼看&#8230;</p>
<p>剛剛看到一則大新聞，說是 Google 花了大約 31 億美金 (約合 1000 億新台幣) 收購 DoubleClick，這裡則分別是兩家公司的新聞稿 (一、二&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerging Earth - Google Buys DoubleClick for $3.1 Billion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94165</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerging Earth - Google Buys DoubleClick for $3.1 Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 05:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I&#8217;m about to leave for a blogging conference, but I just had to tell you the news right away: Google just bought DoubleClick for a whopping $3.1 billion, all-cash. That&#8217;s almost double what they paid for YouTube, beating Microsoft&#8217;s rumored $2 billion bid. [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m about to leave for a blogging conference, but I just had to tell you the news right away: Google just bought DoubleClick for a whopping $3.1 billion, all-cash. That&#8217;s almost double what they paid for YouTube, beating Microsoft&#8217;s rumored $2 billion bid. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Google buys DoubleClick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94164</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; Google buys DoubleClick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94164</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] online advertising business, and will pay anything to keep rivals like Microsoft on a weak footing. It was rumored that Microsoft was considering a bid for DoubleClick for around $2 [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online advertising business, and will pay anything to keep rivals like Microsoft on a weak footing. It was rumored that Microsoft was considering a bid for DoubleClick for around $2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morsa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94163</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Morsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94163</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm...thought it sounded pretty logical until I read Don Dodge's comments...now it sounds like it might be too expensive; even with great synergies, etc...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If 2 billion figure is accurate, that would buy a lot of $10-50 mill innovative companies and technologies...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;...of course, they could always launch a new PPC ad platform where the advertisers; using stored personal profiles; select and bid directly on sets of people's actual demographic traits; ie, "I'll pay $15 for every 45 yr old, married w/2 children, homeowning and football-loving, lives in zip 90210 male looking for a plasma TV who clicks on my ad"...or; in another embodiment; allow "searchers" to input a data/character stream in their search box like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"male +45 +married +2 kids +own home +football +plasma TV +90210"&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;thought it sounded pretty logical until I read Don Dodge&#8217;s comments&#8230;now it sounds like it might be too expensive; even with great synergies, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>If 2 billion figure is accurate, that would buy a lot of $10-50 mill innovative companies and technologies&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;of course, they could always launch a new PPC ad platform where the advertisers; using stored personal profiles; select and bid directly on sets of people&#8217;s actual demographic traits; ie, &#8220;I&#8217;ll pay $15 for every 45 yr old, married w/2 children, homeowning and football-loving, lives in zip 90210 male looking for a plasma TV who clicks on my ad&#8221;&#8230;or; in another embodiment; allow &#8220;searchers&#8221; to input a data/character stream in their search box like:</p>
<p>&#8220;male +45 +married +2 kids +own home +football +plasma TV +90210&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webtech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94162</link>
		<dc:creator>webtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/microsofts-big-spending-ways/#comment-94162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So microsoft is planning to buy doubleClick for the technology or the network? Microsoft already have their own technology - adcentral. So why not spend this $2 billion to improve their platform. Most likely answer is the second answer. They may want to acquire the reach of doubleClick. Is it both? Any better answers?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So microsoft is planning to buy doubleClick for the technology or the network? Microsoft already have their own technology - adcentral. So why not spend this $2 billion to improve their platform. Most likely answer is the second answer. They may want to acquire the reach of doubleClick. Is it both? Any better answers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
