<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Motorola should buy Palm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: So What Should Motorola Do Now? &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[So What Should Motorola Do Now? &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 01:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] argued back in March of 2007 that that Motorola should buy Palm. The tactical reasons I outlined then have since changed, but what hasn’t is the strategic [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] argued back in March of 2007 that that Motorola should buy Palm. The tactical reasons I outlined then have since changed, but what hasn’t is the strategic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Palm's last stand, with a bit of Elevation &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM Palm's last stand, with a bit of Elevation &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] maybe selling out to anyone did seem like a good [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] maybe selling out to anyone did seem like a good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wavelet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wavelet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Uh, Palm isn&#039;t worth buying, not even for nothing.
The company has been dying for years, and because its lack of innovation. Their features are 2 years behind the curve (no Treo with WiFi; bluetooth profiles) and price/performance even worse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PalmOS isn&#039;t under their control, and, at any rate, the OS &amp; Apps haven&#039;t appreciably advanced for years.
There are no 3d-licensees any more; they&#039;ve all dropped out. Palm hasn&#039;t even licensed Cobalt, the newest version.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The models are unreliable, and have been so since the excellent Palm Vx. Motorola already has pretty good Linux platforms (incl. stuff like chinese handwriting recognition); the Palm touchscreen isn&#039;t the optimal one for one-handed phone use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They don&#039;t have a solution for 3G support, which rules out most of the world; not that they have any presence outside North America anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe they have a nicer customization of Windows Mobile -- so why buy the company, just hire the 20 repsonsible engineers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Phone platforms are consolidating. As pointed out, all the major players have their own. Who needs Palm?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, Palm isn&#8217;t worth buying, not even for nothing.<br />
The company has been dying for years, and because its lack of innovation. Their features are 2 years behind the curve (no Treo with WiFi; bluetooth profiles) and price/performance even worse.</p>
<p>PalmOS isn&#8217;t under their control, and, at any rate, the OS &amp; Apps haven&#8217;t appreciably advanced for years.<br />
There are no 3d-licensees any more; they&#8217;ve all dropped out. Palm hasn&#8217;t even licensed Cobalt, the newest version.</p>
<p>The models are unreliable, and have been so since the excellent Palm Vx. Motorola already has pretty good Linux platforms (incl. stuff like chinese handwriting recognition); the Palm touchscreen isn&#8217;t the optimal one for one-handed phone use.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t have a solution for 3G support, which rules out most of the world; not that they have any presence outside North America anyway.</p>
<p>Maybe they have a nicer customization of Windows Mobile &#8212; so why buy the company, just hire the 20 repsonsible engineers.</p>
<p>Phone platforms are consolidating. As pointed out, all the major players have their own. Who needs Palm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolSie.com / The Lighter Side of Mobile Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will We See: Motorola buys Palm?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SolSie.com / The Lighter Side of Mobile Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will We See: Motorola buys Palm?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] could be announced as soon as today, and some heavyweight buyout funds are in running. According to GigaOm, Motorola&#8217;s acquisition of Palm&#160;makes the most strategic and tactical sense compared to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could be announced as soon as today, and some heavyweight buyout funds are in running. According to GigaOm, Motorola&#8217;s acquisition of Palm&nbsp;makes the most strategic and tactical sense compared to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herman manfred</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herman manfred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;So much for the (totally crazy) idea that Motorola (or Nokia) is interested in PALM.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for the (totally crazy) idea that Motorola (or Nokia) is interested in PALM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Shobande Jr</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Shobande Jr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, UIQ in its latest form on a Sony Ericsson P990i is a let down to say the least; SE has lost pole position as the smartphone of choice in the UK.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A painfully slow and confusing Symbian UIQ OS has cost Sony Ericsson its smartphone crown – well at least here in the UK.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So if Motorola and Palm can do a better job then good luck to them.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, UIQ in its latest form on a Sony Ericsson P990i is a let down to say the least; SE has lost pole position as the smartphone of choice in the UK.</p>
<p>A painfully slow and confusing Symbian UIQ OS has cost Sony Ericsson its smartphone crown – well at least here in the UK.</p>
<p>So if Motorola and Palm can do a better job then good luck to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treo Today</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Treo Today]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nokia and Motorola fighting over Palm?...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#8217;s been a long road for Palm, Inc &#8212; its history is full of acquisitions, mergers and demergers.  Palm CEO announced last year that &#8220;companies don&#8217;t get sold, they get bought&#8221; &#8212; which probably meant that Palm would ...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nokia and Motorola fighting over Palm?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a long road for Palm, Inc &#8212; its history is full of acquisitions, mergers and demergers.  Palm CEO announced last year that &#8220;companies don&#8217;t get sold, they get bought&#8221; &#8212; which probably meant that Palm would &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where will Palm land &#8212; Nokia or Motorola? &#187; @ YugaTech &#124; Philippine Technology News &#38; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Where will Palm land &#8212; Nokia or Motorola? &#187; @ YugaTech &#124; Philippine Technology News &#38; Reviews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] think I&#8217;ll go with the hunches at GigaOM and say Motorola needs Palm more than Nokia [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think I&#8217;ll go with the hunches at GigaOM and say Motorola needs Palm more than Nokia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where will Palm land &#8212; Nokia or Motorola? &#187; @ YugaTech &#124; Philippine Technology News &#38; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-168724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Where will Palm land &#8212; Nokia or Motorola? &#187; @ YugaTech &#124; Philippine Technology News &#38; Reviews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-168724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] think I&#8217;ll go with the hunches at GigaOM and say Motorola needs Palm more than Nokia [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think I&#8217;ll go with the hunches at GigaOM and say Motorola needs Palm more than Nokia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.T.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.T.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;oh, please, no Palm @ Nokia... we have already bunch of brain-dead symbianoids here, and now you push another &quot;technology&quot; into our garage :(&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, please, no Palm @ Nokia&#8230; we have already bunch of brain-dead symbianoids here, and now you push another &#8220;technology&#8221; into our garage :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Did we forget that Motorola bought Symbol Technologies?  Symbol offers both Palm (for a limited time) and Mobile 2005 devices.  Wait until Motorola/Symbol release the previously designed Symbol MC35.  Google it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This article is nonsense.  Someone didn&#039;t do their homework.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did we forget that Motorola bought Symbol Technologies?  Symbol offers both Palm (for a limited time) and Mobile 2005 devices.  Wait until Motorola/Symbol release the previously designed Symbol MC35.  Google it.</p>
<p>This article is nonsense.  Someone didn&#8217;t do their homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electronic Whiteboards</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Electronic Whiteboards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your article seems to make sense in that they really can&#039;t stand on their own anymore and companies like Motorola do need to look at that part of the market.  I think that if the handset makers can get the prices for data plan packages down, they could sell a lot more hybrid devices.  I recently added the data plan to my cincular phone (I had read in many places that it is $19.99) for $29.99 a month.  My regular minutes plan was only $39.99 a month so my bill has almost doubled....but of course I&#039;m hooked and can&#039;t go back.

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monomachines.com/shredders.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Shredder &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article seems to make sense in that they really can&#8217;t stand on their own anymore and companies like Motorola do need to look at that part of the market.  I think that if the handset makers can get the prices for data plan packages down, they could sell a lot more hybrid devices.  I recently added the data plan to my cincular phone (I had read in many places that it is $19.99) for $29.99 a month.  My regular minutes plan was only $39.99 a month so my bill has almost doubled&#8230;.but of course I&#8217;m hooked and can&#8217;t go back.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.monomachines.com/shredders.php" rel="nofollow"> Shredder </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m really still waiting for the complete computing package that works (and have been for like 10 years).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m liking where this is going - though I&#039;m not sure if the Google phone won&#039;t eclipse it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;QWERTY keyboard, good solid OS, apps, sync., email, phone... it&#039;s all finally coming together but what will Motorola do with it?  Will they &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; market it as an alternative to the Blackberry or will it be a flash in the pan and if numbers don&#039;t go to the moon instantly it&#039;ll simply be left to rot...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really still waiting for the complete computing package that works (and have been for like 10 years).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m liking where this is going &#8211; though I&#8217;m not sure if the Google phone won&#8217;t eclipse it.</p>
<p>QWERTY keyboard, good solid OS, apps, sync., email, phone&#8230; it&#8217;s all finally coming together but what will Motorola do with it?  Will they <em>really</em> market it as an alternative to the Blackberry or will it be a flash in the pan and if numbers don&#8217;t go to the moon instantly it&#8217;ll simply be left to rot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol' Yeller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ol' Yeller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Whomever buys Palm will be sorry they did in the end.  The Palm OS as a viable platform for growth in mobile is finished.  Talk to anyone selling mobile apps and they&#039;ll tell you Windows Mobile is where the growth and sales are at today, with BlackBerry [ugh] making a strong push of late.  I&#039;m not a fan of WinMob, but the facts speak for themselves...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whomever buys Palm will be sorry they did in the end.  The Palm OS as a viable platform for growth in mobile is finished.  Talk to anyone selling mobile apps and they&#8217;ll tell you Windows Mobile is where the growth and sales are at today, with BlackBerry [ugh] making a strong push of late.  I&#8217;m not a fan of WinMob, but the facts speak for themselves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petabro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[petabro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 05:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;WiMo devices will be the enterprise devices of choice in 1-2years. it is irrevelant who buys Palm&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMo devices will be the enterprise devices of choice in 1-2years. it is irrevelant who buys Palm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim Forbes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim Forbes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/motorola-palm/#comment-139359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om,
although you alluded to it in a general way, Palm already has an inside track with corporate IT, via it&#039;s earlier relatyionship with IBM&#039;s Thinkpad division, which marketed and sold Palm III devices.
And even more interesting alliance would be between Palm and Lenovo (which in addition to ThinkPad and Lenovo portables, also has a solid position in gteh cell phone market.
You&#039;re dead on about the Palm interface on smart phones being outstanding. I can only hope that it gets better. I have found most Pocket PC phones to be to encumbered by features that just get in the way of a cell phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great post, OM.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;dude,
Jim Forbes in Escondido&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,<br />
although you alluded to it in a general way, Palm already has an inside track with corporate IT, via it&#8217;s earlier relatyionship with IBM&#8217;s Thinkpad division, which marketed and sold Palm III devices.<br />
And even more interesting alliance would be between Palm and Lenovo (which in addition to ThinkPad and Lenovo portables, also has a solid position in gteh cell phone market.<br />
You&#8217;re dead on about the Palm interface on smart phones being outstanding. I can only hope that it gets better. I have found most Pocket PC phones to be to encumbered by features that just get in the way of a cell phone.</p>
<p>Great post, OM.</p>
<p>dude,<br />
Jim Forbes in Escondido</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

